06-15-2020, 12:14 AM | #1 | |
(he/him/his)
Posts: 12,204
Karma: 79742714
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sunshine Coast, BC
Device: Oasis (Gen3),Paperwhite (Gen10), Voyage, Paperwhite(orig), Fire HD 8
|
June 2020 Discussion • Passing Strange by Ellen Klages
It's time to discuss our book for June, Passing Strange by Ellen Klages.
Quote:
|
|
06-15-2020, 04:29 AM | #2 | |
cacoethes scribendi
Posts: 5,811
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
I first read this about 18 months ago, and at first it had me disconcerted, wishing the author would make up her mind what sort of story it was meant to be. But, by the end I found that that all the elements had wrapped up very neatly.
This second time around I enjoyed more because I was able to settle straight in and just enjoy the characters and the historical detail. I think the novella is a perfect length for the story. I think the title is a perfect match for the story - in all it connotations. And I thought Helen was a perfectly chosen character to reveal the story. Through Helen, and the other characters' reactions to her, we see that prejudice is multifaceted. Through the array of characters we get to see how the victims of prejudice can become involved in perpetuating the problem - that one way of surviving in such a world is to take whatever advantage of prejudice that you can. And we see them holding together and supporting one another as a community, while even within their own community they were fighting distorted categorisations (femmes and butches etc.). I thought it was a cleverly constructed irony that both Helen and Haskel should be part of perpetuating a distorted view of the Chinese. These complex interactions helped to make the story feel very real to me, even with its touches of fantasy. It all fit together very well. On top of that we had some excellent historical fiction describing 1940s San Francisco. And it was all supported by a sweet romance and an entertaining story with a touch of mystery, and a touch of magic that - aside from the folded map thing - was even left open for you to accept or not as you pleased: Quote:
The main thing I would pick on with this story is that I found the booby trap less than convincing. I don't know if anyone here was as stupid as me as a child, but my experience with the suggested substance was painful rather than having the presumed result. (I still remember the burning sensation.) My experience suggests that to get the required result takes rather more subtlety. |
|
Advert | |
|
06-15-2020, 06:48 AM | #3 |
Resident Curmudgeon
Posts: 75,890
Karma: 134368292
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
I did enjoy Passing Strange. I found the part of the story that took place in modern time to be good. I wanted to fond out more about Helen and the painting. Then the story shifted to the past telling us the story.
It was well written and a very enjoyable read. You care about the main characters. You want them to be together. They supported each other even though what they were doing was illegal back then. The relationships where well done and the magic wasn't the focus I really liked how the magic was used. There's a lot going on and it all works well. |
06-15-2020, 01:05 PM | #4 |
(he/him/his)
Posts: 12,204
Karma: 79742714
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sunshine Coast, BC
Device: Oasis (Gen3),Paperwhite (Gen10), Voyage, Paperwhite(orig), Fire HD 8
|
First, I quite enjoyed this book, and enjoyed it even more on a re-read. gmw has several excellent points, which I might get around to addressing later, but for the moment I want to focus on what to some is a bit of a sidetrack -- Treasure Island.
Treasure Island, to anyone who has lived in the SFBay area, is a toxic, radioactive, U.S. Navy dump site. So seeing what it was back in 1939, just before it got closed down and completely taken over by the Navy, was a revelation. And The Gayway? Too funny a name, given both the context of the story, and the changes to San Francisco since. The Wikipedia article on the Golden Gate International Exposition is worth a quick read, as are some of the cited references. I'm indebted to Ms. Klages for opening my eyes to something that I lived next to for 20 years and never knew much about. |
06-15-2020, 08:21 PM | #5 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,356
Karma: 52612287
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
I hated it.
It started out boring and confusing, with too many characters to try to distinguish. Then it settled down to being Haskel and Emily, and I thought, okay, finally, now where are we going with this story? The answer was nowhere. Then it got to the magic painting nonsense, and I thought, What the ----? I am annoyed and angry at the hours I wasted. The only redeeming feature was the mention of a variety of familiar song titles; in my head I could hear Sinatra singing Cole Porter, which made me want to dig out my CDs. The book was heavy on atmosphere, throwing in everything but the kitchen sink as the backdrop, and light on story. As annoyed as I was by the end, I read the magic painting stuff twice. Still have no idea what the heck was going on and where they were supposed to end up. And I don't care. Did I mention I hated it? |
Advert | |
|
06-15-2020, 08:55 PM | #6 |
cacoethes scribendi
Posts: 5,811
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
Hang on, let me check ... yes. Yes you did.
And I really hate to point this out, but the kitchen sink was in there too, it got a few mentions. Sorry you didn't like it, but at least it was short so it should not have tied you up for too long. |
06-16-2020, 06:43 AM | #7 | |
Professor of Law
Posts: 3,667
Karma: 66000002
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Device: Kobo Elipsa, Kobo Libra H20, Kobo Aura One, KoboMini
|
I, like Catlady, did not enjoy this book at all. It was a staggering disappointment to me as a gay reader, but I'll get to that.
Mechanically, the pacing was uneven at best. I felt like the historical accuracy was iffy, at best, and ignored some of the issues that the text itself raised. The characters were very one-note and stereotypical. And it is the stereotypes that drove me absolutely nuts. Were you brave enough to google lesbian stereotypes, you would get tons of lists on sites as varied as CNN to Jezebel to Glamour Magazine. But almost every list shares these tropes:
These stereotypes, particularly the first, have haunted gays for years and can be used in incredibly harmful ways against us. And every single one of them was in this novel in a real plot-related way. You may be saying to yourself, "Well of course there would be parental issues in the 30s and 40s when this behavior was so frowned upon." But the thing is, in the book and in the stereotype, the abuse was unrelated to the child's sexuality. It was just there to create a trauma for the character. This sort of plot device is incredibly harmful because it conveys the underlying notion that a person is not born gay, but rather, is made gay by having a bad thing happen to them. This trope is actually frequently used against gays to demonstrate we are somehow damaged and in need of fixing, not born this way. From the Southern Poverty Law Center: Quote:
ETA: In my rush this morning, I did not address the latter two stereotypes - the colleges and the U-Hauls. This notion of educated lesbians being bred at Wellsley, etc., is exclusionary in a big way. It denies the experiences of poor and poorly educated gays and lesbians, particularly those of color. I was particularly bothered by the "oops started sleeping with my college roommate and we got caught" episode. Had I been caught with a woman as a teenager, I would have been either homeless or forced into conversion therapy (which would have been worse). All the women in this story have found their way on their feet somehow and that is just not the reality of it. The U-Haul stereotype just smacks of desperation. It portrays women who are so desperate for domesticity that they will literally attach themselves to the first eligible candidate. By taking this immediate jump, partners do not actually talk about issues or discover habits that might make co-habitation difficult. It is also just lazy writing. Woman loses home and a woman with space and the financial ability appears and provides a loving home. Even if I could have gotten past the stereotypes in general, the plot revolving around the need to rid themselves of the big, bad, man in a way that ends in his death was just too much. I'm just vastly disappointed, and more so because this book got such acclaim. (I'm not sure there is a way to not toe the water on politics here, so redact whatever you think necessary, issy). Last edited by astrangerhere; 06-16-2020 at 10:25 AM. |
|
06-16-2020, 07:04 AM | #8 |
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,543
Karma: 224837692
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
|
06-16-2020, 10:44 AM | #9 |
cacoethes scribendi
Posts: 5,811
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
An interesting perspective, astrangerhere.
I would argue that Haskel's unhappy childhood was offered as an explanation for her art rather than her sexuality, the text seems fairly explicit in this regard. I can understand how offering this sort of plot device can be harmful, but I think there is more context here. For any author researching plausible backgrounds there is any amount of misery to be found in artist backgrounds. [Omitted various real life examples, I doubt we need them.] That art attracts those with unhappy backgrounds (or foregrounds, for that matter), is a pretty common trope in itself, of course. But my point is that the setting is as much an art and entertainment one as anything else, and so the tropes blur into one another. Perhaps perhaps arguing that it's an arts trope rather than a lesbian relationship trope isn't all that helpful as regards the book's use of stereotypes, but it's how I read it and it didn't stand out as a problem. For the rest, I don't read enough LGBT literature to offer comment on what tropes are common. Yes, the sexual involvement seemed overly rushed perhaps, but the book never gave me the sense that either woman was promiscuous (quite the opposite). Off that subject, this page has some photos of Mona's: Before the Castro: North Beach, a Gay Mecca |
06-16-2020, 11:21 AM | #10 | ||||
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,356
Karma: 52612287
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I would have preferred the story to be about his death and its aftermath; that was the only really dramatic event and it might have been interesting to explore its effects. But then suddenly we go all deus ex machina. |
||||
06-16-2020, 12:30 PM | #11 |
Professor of Law
Posts: 3,667
Karma: 66000002
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Device: Kobo Elipsa, Kobo Libra H20, Kobo Aura One, KoboMini
|
But my point is that she had an out. She was able to grab her typewriter and just land in a new, magical place where it all worked itself out.
Jack being roughed up and taken in by police was the most realistic thing to me, and even that didn't sit well. There was little acknowledgment of the horror that would most certainly have been inflicted on her by male guards when she was sentenced to 6 months. It seemed to be a scene for the sake of itself that did not give it the seriousness it deserved, but rather served to make Emily homeless and in need of Haskel's apartment. |
06-16-2020, 04:47 PM | #12 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,356
Karma: 52612287
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
|
|
06-16-2020, 06:47 PM | #13 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,015
Karma: 19767610
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Device: ipad, Kindle PW, Kobo Clara; iphone 7
|
I enjoyed the book. I thought it was fun and quite charming. Though it was short, the descritive passages made the setting quite tangible, and appealing to read about. I liked all the characters.
I understand of the critiques, but I saw the book differently, and didn’t find either the gay or straight characters falling into stereotypes. I didn’t think the scene with the pianist was just a device. It was distressing to read how the cop treated her, and I thought the author intentionally wanted to portray the abuse of power against lesbians in the 40s, and what was in store for her. It was awful to think about. In terms of the two women, we were told Emily went home alone every night, though she had plenty of offers. Haskel had remained single for years. Emily wasn’t homeless; she just needed a place for the night. They had friends in common, etc., so crashing Haskel’s place seemed reasonable. The connection between the two women actually began during the performance, before the fight. Emily recognized Haskel, saw how moved she was, and sang directly to her. Was their connection overly rushed? Well, people do hook up sometimes, and they were both young and functionally single. I can remember being young once too, lol, so it seemed plausible to me. Like gmw, I thought that the childhood abuse was fuel for Haskel’s artwork. It functioned very similarly to the oppression and pain experienced by Kahlo and Rivera. I didn’t think all the men and and straight people were abusive. Emily’s brother was loving, Rivera was good friend, Helen’s connections were kind, etc. Children, LGBT people and non-whites who have less social power experience more abuse - even more so in the 1940s - so its inclusion in the story seemed realistic to me. Having a little magic thrown in was fun. Yes, it was cheating, and I usually hate Deus Ex Machina, but in this case it was satisfying. It was so implausible that I enjoyed it - like sticking my tongue out at the abusive and discriminatory laws of the day. Sorry for being so longwinded. And I hope this doesn’t seem argumentative. I do appreciate the seriousness of stereotypes and can see how this book is open to that critque; I just saw the author’s intent differently. PS: Just a quick postscript to say the magical escape, and the exploding painting reminded me of the movie “The Sting”. Last edited by Victoria; 06-16-2020 at 07:01 PM. |
06-16-2020, 08:06 PM | #14 | ||
E-reader Enthusiast
Posts: 4,873
Karma: 36507503
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southwest, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis 3; Kobo Aura One; iPad Mini 5
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
06-17-2020, 09:02 AM | #15 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,015
Karma: 19767610
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Device: ipad, Kindle PW, Kobo Clara; iphone 7
|
Quote:
Last edited by Victoria; 06-17-2020 at 10:49 AM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Short Fiction England, George Allan: Maroon Key (2020); v1; 18 June 2020 | Pulpmeister | ePub Books | 1 | 06-18-2020 08:13 AM |
Short Fiction England, George Allan: Maroon Key (2020); v1; 18 June 2020 | Pulpmeister | Kindle Books | 0 | 06-17-2020 09:07 PM |
Short Fiction Bedford-Jones, H: The Blood of Kings (2020); v1; 5 June 2020 | Pulpmeister | Kindle Books | 0 | 06-05-2020 07:14 AM |
Short Fiction Bedford-Jones, H: The Blood of Kings (2020); v1; 5 June 2020 | Pulpmeister | ePub Books | 0 | 06-05-2020 07:13 AM |
New Leaf February 2018 Discussion • Passing by Nella Larsen | issybird | Book Clubs | 164 | 11-21-2018 07:35 PM |