|
View Poll Results: What opinion do you have for/against Watermarks as opposed to full-scale DRMs | |||
Both are equally BAD. | 38 | 25.68% | |
Watermark is better than DRMs. | 108 | 72.97% | |
DRMs is better than Watermark. | 1 | 0.68% | |
Both are equally GOOD | 1 | 0.68% | |
Voters: 148. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
10-01-2012, 05:53 AM | #76 |
Guru
Posts: 895
Karma: 4383958
Join Date: Nov 2007
Device: na
|
tompe: I wouldn't want that kind of watermark. I wouldn't care about any added hidden extras, but would certainly end up making a small util to run through and remove the visible bits from the book.
I don't mind anything like that been placed within the copyright/contents/any of the pages leading up to the very first chapter, nor after the very last chapter. But within the story itself, even if it's just a footer now and then, I don't want it. However, it would probably not stop me buying books that are in that form, because unlike with DRM it'd be easy to fix the annoyances yourself. |
10-01-2012, 06:20 AM | #77 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
It is not disturbing since it is written in another colour (grey) that is harder to read so you will easily skip over it. You must have something visible to remind peope that the book is marked with the owners name.
|
Advert | |
|
10-01-2012, 06:32 AM | #78 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,332
Karma: 4000000
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Paris
Device: Cybooks; Sony PRS-T1
|
Quote:
But it's even better to have neither wartermark or drm. Last edited by EowynCarter; 10-01-2012 at 08:03 AM. |
|
10-01-2012, 07:31 AM | #79 | |
Groupie
Posts: 172
Karma: 161634
Join Date: Dec 2010
Device: Nook
|
Quote:
But I think it would be easier to get Publishers (and e-retailers) to accept to "downgrade" to Watermarks than to No DRMs. It gives at leasty a modicum of "protection", while removing all the anti-formatshifting/long term preservation issues. |
|
10-01-2012, 08:00 AM | #80 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,594
Karma: 21245891
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo Libra h20, Paperwhite 2017, Phone & Tablet w Moonreader
|
Quote:
I like buying stuff where there is no complication. Watermark wouldn't affect me at all because it contains ZERO of the reasons I vehemently dislike encrypted DRM (for things I purchase personally). But yes, having no watermark at all would be ideal for my utopia. The principle being, that I, as a customer, am by default trusted to keep my product for personal use. |
|
Advert | |
|
10-01-2012, 12:42 PM | #81 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,345
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
Let's say that an author finds that Peter Pirate has been uploading the author's books. How is the author going to track down this guy without further identifying information? There might be a number of people with that name. And if there is further identifying information, isn't that a potential privacy concern? Aren't some sort of usernames attached to the torrent uploads and shared files now? Can't someone whose copyright has been infringed attempt to track down information on who is behind those names now? |
|
10-01-2012, 12:51 PM | #82 | |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,506
Karma: 306214458
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
Quote:
But I don't think that any watermarking would directly include personal data. The link to the bookshop account is sufficient. |
|
10-01-2012, 02:14 PM | #83 | |
Groupie
Posts: 172
Karma: 161634
Join Date: Dec 2010
Device: Nook
|
Quote:
For example, bookshop identifier and order number could easily suffice. |
|
10-01-2012, 02:19 PM | #84 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,345
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
I really don't see it. My first impression was, yeah, fine, watermark, won't affect me, but the more I think about it, about how it might actually work, it looks like a recipe for trouble. I think there might be huge privacy issues with it. |
|
10-01-2012, 02:56 PM | #85 | |
Groupie
Posts: 172
Karma: 161634
Join Date: Dec 2010
Device: Nook
|
Quote:
Should Peter Pirate want to spread the ebook, he will have to get rid the ebook of it's visible and invisible parts. If we suppose that some of them are removed, (but not all), and the ebook is torrented, Publisher will get the pirated copy, give it to the Watermark's creator, who will find out the shop and order number. With that, the Publisher can indeed go and see the reseller to ask for the customer's data. Yes, it CAN lead to privacy issues , but no more than encryption-based DRM, which for all we know not only does restrict the legitimate uses, but also contains personal data, with EXACTLY the same privacy issues. |
|
10-01-2012, 04:57 PM | #86 |
Guru
Posts: 787
Karma: 1575310
Join Date: Jul 2009
Device: Moon+ Pro
|
Something nobody's mentioned is that watermarks could allow legal transfer of ebooks. (Not duplication, transfer. I'm sure you know the difference.) Some method might need to be developed to record the transfer-or maybe they'd leave it up to the individual. Such things are common for other licenses. Sometimes the 'owner' wants to keep track of who's got the license (i.e. the transfer needs to be registered) and sometimes it only matters when something happens. In the latter case it's up to the users to keep their own records of the transfer-which often isn't done & can end up penalizing an innocent party. People rarely understand how important it is to keep transaction records.
One other point is the use of DRM by libraries. First, the essence of watermarking is that every 'copy' is unique in some way. There's no big trick about doing that so there's no reason why libraries shouldn't be able to apply their own watermarks to the copies they 'lend'. As with purchased copies this would allow re-lending. (I've often checked books out of the library for people who are handicapped. I'm not sure what would constitute a handicap for an ebook, maybe not having Internet? But I see no legal reason why I shouldn't be able to check out & 'return' an ebook for somebody else.) Regarding privacy invasion, it's already there with almost anything you buy. The only way to avoid it is to pay cash-and even then some places ask for ID. (I actually had one place say they couldn't complete the sale without my name & address-but that seemed to be a limitation of their point of sale system since they readily completed the sale when I told the clerk to feel free to fill in their own name & address.) In both cases (watermarks or non-cash purchases) a court order *should* be needed to access the information-but no organization has been totally able to keep secrets so whatever is recorded you can expect it will get out. (Remember that not even the CIA was able to keep a Russian mole out. About the only place that I haven't heard of secrets leaking from is the NSA-and I expect that it's simply not hearing about it rather than not having happened.) |
10-01-2012, 09:31 PM | #87 |
Padawan Learner
Posts: 243
Karma: 1085815
Join Date: May 2009
Location: www.OutlawGalaxy.com, Foothills of NY's Adirondack mountains
Device: My PC...using Puppy Linux (FBReader, Calibre, Kindle Cloud Reader,
|
IANAL but I would think that any form of watermark that discloses a customer's CC or banking information MUST be illegal...it probably violates any number of consumer protection/privacy laws or vendor agreements between CC processing companies and vendors.
I would certainly think such watermarks would open up the publishers to lawsuits for breaching customer privacy/banking laws. |
10-01-2012, 09:50 PM | #88 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,345
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
|
|
10-01-2012, 11:30 PM | #89 |
Wizard
Posts: 4,538
Karma: 264065402
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Taiwan
Device: HP Touchpad, Sony Duo 13, Lumia 920, Kobo Aura HD
|
I really don't see the problem. If you innocently give an e-book to one person and that book winds up on a file sharing site then they will come to you and you will tell them who you shared the book with and so on down the line until they get to the guilty party. Exactly how it should be. You will get off with a warning and the real offender can be punished. And yes, it would mean that people should not share their books with friends or family members they cannot count on to act responsibly. Another plus.
|
10-02-2012, 12:13 AM | #90 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,345
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
drm, watermark |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kindle Store France and DRMs | TheSFReader | Amazon Kindle | 31 | 12-15-2012 02:44 PM |
Amazon France et les DRMs | TheSFReader | Amazon Kindle | 2 | 10-29-2011 03:23 PM |
Annoying Watermarks | jimccjr | Library Management | 1 | 05-31-2011 03:26 PM |
How to get rid of the ABC Amber watermarks? | MrGolem | Calibre | 5 | 12-20-2009 01:05 PM |
PDF Watermarks | GodDamN | Sony Reader | 5 | 05-11-2007 12:41 AM |