09-27-2012, 10:17 AM | #1 |
Addict
Posts: 254
Karma: 69786
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway
Device: Kobo Aura, Sony PRS-650
|
Epub - best practice for base font size?
I produce epubs with a custom CSS file, which I am generally happy with. I use relative font sizes for everything. I specify most things in a body definition, and override them for a host of different h, p, and span classes.
However, I tend to specify a bit smaller body text font (which is the base for all other sizes), between 0.8 and 0.9em. This is because some e-ink devices, like older Sony Readers and various no-brand readers, have a limited choice of font size adjustments, especially in the lower end of the scale. The prs-650 at the largest size will display around 20 words per page, while the gaps between the smallest sizes are fairly large. I feel that a somewhat smaller base size gives the reader a better chance of finding a comfortable size. In software readers I have never had an issue with adjusting to a perfect font size. We embed Deja Vu serif in most books if that's relevant, this is because a lot of our books contain international glyphs, we're not living in ASCII-land, so default fonts don't suffice What do the gurus think? Is it bad to specify other base sizes than 1em, or is it acceptable to use it as a workaround for limitations in some devices? Last edited by Man Eating Duck; 09-27-2012 at 10:30 AM. |
09-27-2012, 11:04 AM | #2 |
frumious Bandersnatch
Posts: 7,514
Karma: 18512745
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spaniard in Sweden
Device: Cybook Orizon, Kobo Aura
|
It's bad to specify any default font size (1em or 100% would be OK, but why bother? it's a no-op). If I have a preferred font size, I want that, not 90% of that. If my device has bugs or limitations, let me find the fix, do not impose it on me (and do not impose me a fix for other devices).
Regarding the font embedding, I don't like it either. My device lets me install and choose my preferred font, so I have no problem with non-ASCII characters. |
Advert | |
|
09-27-2012, 12:39 PM | #3 | ||
Addict
Posts: 254
Karma: 69786
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway
Device: Kobo Aura, Sony PRS-650
|
Quote:
Quote:
That said (oh no, here I go, feel free to skip the rest), we do it because the vast majority of our readers wouldn't know where to begin if they needed a font which has, for instance, Turkish dotless ı. Power users can and will do what they want, including removing/substituting fonts freely in the file, as most of our books are published without DRM encumbrance (not that DRM will stop anyone). Of course we have no problems with that, I have even provided guidance for a customer who wanted to tweak one of our books. We chose Deja Vu serif because it works well on small screens, is not hideous, has no licence issues, and includes (so far) every glyph we've ever needed in a variety of academic publications. I know about the pros and cons of embedding, but for us it's pretty much a necessity as too many devices assume that English is the only language on the planet. |
||
09-27-2012, 01:25 PM | #4 |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,410
Karma: 305065800
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
I would suggest that the smallest relative font size you should specific should be about 60%. If someone chose a 10pt font that would be a 6pt font.
If your books have lots of non-English characters, embedding a font might be a reasonable solution. But the default fonts in ebook readers are becoming better when it comes to unicode character support. I think it would be worth checking whether you really still need to do it. |
09-27-2012, 01:43 PM | #5 | ||
Addict
Posts: 254
Karma: 69786
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway
Device: Kobo Aura, Sony PRS-650
|
Quote:
Quote:
In academic publishing it's completely unacceptable to misspell someone's name; this includes foreign characters and all kinds of accents. For ebooks this also means that we must be very sure that they'll display correctly. I'll have a second look (I already have a script somewhere which creates a list of used characters), but I'm not optimistic. Edit: Of course there are probably some of our books that won't need embedded fonts. Do you have any suggestions about what font-face definitions would be suitable for a book without embedded fonts? We use regular, italics, and occasionally bold/bold-italics font styles. Last edited by Man Eating Duck; 09-27-2012 at 02:20 PM. |
||
Advert | |
|
09-27-2012, 04:50 PM | #6 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,467
Karma: 192992430
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Quote:
Another thing to keep in mind is that the newer Nooks will circumvent your embedded fonts right out of the box. That's the default behavior. Unless the user knows to go into the settings and enable "Publisher Defaults," they're likely to see question marks in place of those special characters regardless. |
|
09-27-2012, 05:36 PM | #7 | |
Addict
Posts: 254
Karma: 69786
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway
Device: Kobo Aura, Sony PRS-650
|
Quote:
Thanks to all three of you for useful tips, you learn something every day. I'll consider the options regarding embedded fonts, I promise |
|
09-28-2012, 08:44 PM | #8 |
Addict
Posts: 254
Karma: 69786
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway
Device: Kobo Aura, Sony PRS-650
|
Well, this is not easy. Some of us publishing techs who remember the old times long for a return to the times of the fixed paper page, when ink on paper never changed
No, not really, not on my part. As an ebook creator in a professional capacity, and an avid ebook reader, as you probably gather, I am very concerned that our readers shall get the best ebooks that it is in my power to create. The responses from experts such as you guys carry a lot of weight, and I won't ignore them. I'm currently looking into how to isolate books which would not need embedded fonts in our workflow, and also how to isolate certain glyphs which might need an embedded font (or an image, which opens another rather large can of worms). That's a tough one, BTW. What do you think about a clause on the colophon page saying something like "Please give feedback about technical quality to <email address>"? Is it defeatist, or a good thing? I have never seen neither publishers nor self-publishers use it, but I've given feedback nonetheless at times |
09-29-2012, 12:38 AM | #9 | |
Wizard
Posts: 2,608
Karma: 3000161
Join Date: Jan 2009
Device: Kindle PW3 (wifi)
|
Quote:
http://efele.net/ebooks/livres/000163/index.html (at least the full EPUB version) |
|
09-29-2012, 03:46 AM | #10 | |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,410
Karma: 305065800
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
Quote:
I quite like the idea of a technical feedback address. I might add one to my next book. |
|
09-29-2012, 07:21 AM | #11 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,467
Karma: 192992430
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
I think that's a great idea too. Maybe a link to a website where people could submit issues complete with locations/pages. I've found people seem more willing (for whatever reason) to click the 'submit' button on a web page than they are to compose/send an email.
|
10-10-2012, 02:42 PM | #12 |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,410
Karma: 305065800
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
I've moved the posts about subsetting fonts to a new thread over here.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Base font size for Kindle profile? | Ferrian | Devices | 1 | 03-27-2012 11:37 PM |
Ideal base font size for ePub? | eosrose | ePub | 5 | 05-28-2010 12:45 AM |
base font size ? What unit should I use ? | NASCARaddicted | ePub | 32 | 05-13-2010 03:14 PM |
Base Font Size not Working | Colaveare | Calibre | 0 | 05-06-2009 02:09 AM |
Global html2lrf/recipe base-font-size? | streaml1ne | Calibre | 1 | 07-06-2008 11:59 AM |