04-06-2009, 02:14 PM | #1 |
ZCD BombShel
Posts: 4,793
Karma: 8293322
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Frozen North (aka Illinois, USA)
Device: iPad, STB Kindle Oasis
|
Ok, I just HAVE to ask...
What the freakin' heck is wrong with adverbs? Stephen King insists the "way to hell is paved with adverbs", my English Comp. professor quotes him constantly, and me, I'm left thinking that adverbs are surely part of the English language for a reason...
I'll be the first to tell you I am NOT a writer. However, neither am I illiterate, I can get my point across when need be. Some of you writers enlighten me, please? |
04-06-2009, 03:28 PM | #2 | |
Banned
Posts: 5,100
Karma: 72193
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: South of the Border
Device: Coffin
|
Quote:
Take for instance these two sentences: 1. He ran quickly toward the burning building. 2. He ran toward the burning building. The problem with the adverb in this sentence is that it's not needed, it's redundant as it is in many cases. To run is to move with speed, you can't run slowly. To run slowly is to jog. It would be the same as using "He jogged slowly.' The adverb is also used in a lazy fashion in place of actual, in-time events. Like a shorthand for actual descriptive action. He boldly walked to the far side of the room. Chest out, chin high, all the importance of his position in each step, he strode to the far side of the room. But more so, I think King is talking about speech attribution when he talks of adverbs. Again two more examples. 1. "I'm sick and tired of this bullshit!' Pico said angrily. 2. "I'm sick and tired of this bullshit!" Pico said. We don't need to know Pico is angry, his words provide that emotion, and so should his actions, interior monologue, the framing of the events within the story. I think, but I'm not a hundred percent sure on this, but the common -ly ending of a lot of adverbs have their roots in a German word for dead, or corpse. A linguist would be able to tell you more about this, I only remember it in passing. It's been a long time since I've thought consciously of grammar when I write, but I seem to remember when an adverb is used in attribution it is also known as a "Swifty". Actually, that might be in "On Writing" Here's a few more examples from my own writing: How it might be written (if you were insane) 1. The machine rose threateningly above the horizon. The machinery no longer turned. Its eyes were shut, positively shut. How I wrote it (and I am insane) 2. Looming over the horizon, the machine was as silent as shadows. The great turning of secret and hidden guts no longer turned. The burning fire of its eyes extinguished, closed in the dead weight of mechanical sleep. Last edited by Moejoe; 04-06-2009 at 03:46 PM. |
|
04-06-2009, 04:20 PM | #3 |
ZCD BombShel
Posts: 4,793
Karma: 8293322
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Frozen North (aka Illinois, USA)
Device: iPad, STB Kindle Oasis
|
Thanks Moe. Nice to know we share a personality trait (insanity).
|
04-06-2009, 04:24 PM | #4 |
Provocateur
Posts: 1,859
Karma: 505847
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Device: Kindle Touch, Kindle 2, Kindle DX, iPhone 3GS
|
All writers will present you a list of rules... and then break them. Most writing is about knowing when to break the rules and when not to. So adverbs are fine; it's just that most beginning writers overuse them, so they're warned away from them.
|
04-06-2009, 04:25 PM | #5 | |
Banned
Posts: 5,100
Karma: 72193
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: South of the Border
Device: Coffin
|
Quote:
As an aside, you'll find passive writing in a lot of commercially successful novels. I tend to see it most often in the few romances I've skimmed through, and a few blockbuster thrillers. Also, Stephen King, despite his protestations, is not averse to using a a Swifty or two in his own work. |
|
04-06-2009, 07:36 PM | #6 |
Guru
Posts: 663
Karma: 84658
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Minnesota, USA
Device: PB360+, Sony950, VR Stream, iPod Touch, iPad
|
I think that the proscription against adverbs is to curb the tendency to tell instead of show. I think that there is a place for adverbs, just as there is a place for the much-maligned passive voice.
|
04-06-2009, 10:03 PM | #7 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 10,155
Karma: 4632658
Join Date: Nov 2007
Device: none
|
Quote:
Cheers, Marc (who barely uses the "rules" of photography even as guidelines anymore) |
|
04-06-2009, 11:17 PM | #8 |
Connoisseur
Posts: 78
Karma: 500132
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Akron, Ohio
Device: Blackberry Storm, laptop
|
Adverbs are good for speech but not so good for writing. That's why they're in our language, they abbreviate for us. If I want to tell you something, but I'm not trying to tell a grand story, my speech will most likely be littered with adverbs. In writing, however, they tend to take out the action that the writer needs to show. With good writing, the reader intuits what is happening naturally, with adverb heavy writing, he has it shoved down his throat--brutally.
|
04-06-2009, 11:26 PM | #9 | |
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Karma: 10
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
Much like our legal system, laws (rules) matter but there are exigent circumstances where you clearly violated the precept but in a forgivable way. |
|
04-14-2009, 05:49 AM | #10 | |
Provocateur
Posts: 1,859
Karma: 505847
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Device: Kindle Touch, Kindle 2, Kindle DX, iPhone 3GS
|
Quote:
|
|