10-24-2013, 02:32 AM | #46 |
Unicycle Daredevil
Posts: 13,923
Karma: 185041098
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet of the Pudding Brains
Device: Aura HD (R.I.P. After six years the USB socket died.) tolino shine 3
|
Has already been done. Pretty funny stuff, actually.
|
10-24-2013, 03:45 AM | #47 | |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
|
|
Advert | |
|
10-24-2013, 09:39 AM | #48 | |
Now what?
Posts: 58,858
Karma: 135181808
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Durham, NC
Device: Every Kindle Ever Made & To Be Made!
|
Quote:
BUT, Austen's novels are firmly linked to their temporal setting. Her novels contain characters whose conversation, actions, settings, and life stories make sense only in their respective century. That's what makes them such rich reading - you enter another world in another time - and follow the lives of characters whose lives follow rules quite different from your own. That's the charm of reading Austen in the 21st century. If you want to read about families living in the 21st century, there are scores of novels published each year. There's no need to temporally transplant characters, or mangle plot lines, to 'update' a classic novel for contemporary readers. Modern authors can write a novel as an homage to a prior author's work, but it is an original creation, not a copy or 'update'. For example, Cynthia Ozick is one of the foremost scholars on the works of Henry James. Her novel Foreign Bodies is an homage to James' The Ambassadors. But her novel is not a simple updating of James' plot line to set it in the 1950's. Instead, Ozick created a unique world of her own, whose characters loosely follow the general plot of The Ambassadors but their stories belong to them (and Ozick), not to James. That's the difference. |
|
10-24-2013, 10:53 AM | #49 |
Philosopher
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
|
This is a tempest in a teaspoon; put away the pitchforks and torches, no one is taking Jane Austen away. I have no interest in reading this adaptation. I suppose some people might read it who were put off by the language of the original. Perhaps it won't be as good, but that doesn't make it 'pablum'. Others might read it because they liked the original. But the original will be utterly unharmed.
|
10-24-2013, 11:08 AM | #50 |
Zennist
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
|
I would have no interest reading the classics this way, especially for books like P&P which I found perfectly understandable in its original form.
However, I suppose if I was the author of such a book, I would be flattered that someone would think enough of my work to attempt to adapt it this way. Maybe somewhere in heaven Jane Austen is smiling at all the attention her works garner. --Pat |
Advert | |
|
10-24-2013, 11:28 AM | #51 | |
Nameless Being
|
Quote:
Dad dead. Did uncle do it? What to do? Everyone dies. |
|
10-24-2013, 02:45 PM | #52 | |
Wizard
Posts: 2,745
Karma: 83407757
Join Date: Mar 2011
Device: Kindle Paperwhite, Lenovo Duet Chromebook, Moto e
|
Quote:
|
|
10-24-2013, 03:13 PM | #53 |
Guru
Posts: 985
Karma: 4567263
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The End Of The Earth
Device: Several
|
And this is not about doing a clever twist, like Clueless being a take off of Emma. This is about dumbing down the language and situations of the original story because they're supposed to be 'too hard'.
|
10-24-2013, 04:41 PM | #54 |
Groupie
Posts: 186
Karma: 1317334
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London
Device: kindle
|
I'm getting a vibe from this thread -similar to what happens when you start discussing Richard III...
People have such set opinions on Austen and Richard - and yet it has started a conversation that might not have been held in the first place. So what if there is a modern adaptation? Readers might think - 'I'd like to read the original' and those who would never have picked Austen up before might give it her a try. I became a history addict through a similar route- I HATED history at school, but as an adult read a Margaret George historical fiction book that made me wonder if actual history could be as exciting...from there I went to the library (yes, it was a long time ago) and started reading about the Tudors - and was hooked forever after. |
10-24-2013, 04:52 PM | #55 |
Wizard
Posts: 4,812
Karma: 26912940
Join Date: Apr 2010
Device: sony PRS-T1 and T3, Kobo Mini and Aura HD, Tablet
|
I am a bit confused as to the concept and my reactions to it. I was a might annoyed when I found out at 15 (A bit slow but no internet then) that the readers digest versions weren't the whole deal. Bitter even. But I did enjoy the Readers Digest versions so why was I whining?
Overall I guess it is fine. If someone wants to publish them and someone wants to read them, more power to both. Even if they are slightly dumbed down, which I don't know that they are, is that so bad? I started out reading Nursery Rhymes and Comic books. Helen |
10-24-2013, 08:29 PM | #56 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,747
Karma: 3761220
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Pennsylvania
Device: T1 Red, Kindle Fire, Kindle PW, PW2, Nook HD+, Kobo Mini, Aura HD
|
I think it is very similar to how some that love classical music felt when they started making mixes out of and modernizing some of classic symphonies. Those were some interesting times and it is almost like deja vu for me with what I am seeing here in this thread. I still really didn't like it with classical music. But, if it gets people to want to listen to it in one way or another, who am I to complain. I feel the same way about the classical literature being discussed here.
|
10-24-2013, 09:46 PM | #57 |
Wizard
Posts: 4,538
Karma: 264065402
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Taiwan
Device: HP Touchpad, Sony Duo 13, Lumia 920, Kobo Aura HD
|
I would be fine with such a re-write, if anybody wants to read it. But then keep Jane Austen's name off the new book. It won't be her work anymore.
|
10-25-2013, 12:45 AM | #58 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,305
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
|
Quote:
|
|
10-25-2013, 03:51 AM | #59 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
|
10-25-2013, 03:54 AM | #60 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
No, it's about modernising the language and situations. That's not at all the same thing as "dumbing down".
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Romance Austen, Jane: The Novels of Jane Austen vol. I V.1 9 July 2011 | crich70 | ePub Books | 3 | 09-14-2011 10:17 AM |
Romance Austen, Jane: The Novels of Jane Austen vol. I V.1 9 July 2011 | crich70 | Kindle Books | 0 | 07-09-2011 01:02 AM |
Romance Austen, Jane: The Novels of Jane Austen vol. II V.1 9 July 2011 | crich70 | ePub Books | 0 | 07-09-2011 01:00 AM |
Short Fiction Austen, Jane: Jane Austen's Minor Works. v3. 29th Aug 2009 | HarryT | ePub Books | 0 | 08-29-2009 06:53 AM |
Biography Austen, Jane: Letters of Jane Austen. v1. 29th Aug 2009 | HarryT | ePub Books | 0 | 08-29-2009 06:41 AM |