02-19-2016, 09:57 AM | #16 |
Member
Posts: 11
Karma: 450
Join Date: Jan 2016
Device: kobo touch
|
i would like to see if i can get the experimental browser a good bit faster for quora.com, and also i read articles much more than ebooks which means alot of reloading OS files to go back into menus, the delete process is slow, little things like that.
but yes sandisk ultra might be overkill if the card reader inside the kobo itself has a low max transfer speed, or if the device then becomes more bottlenecked by the processor, etc Last edited by diskette; 02-19-2016 at 10:03 AM. |
02-19-2016, 05:31 PM | #17 |
Resident Curmudgeon
Posts: 73,970
Karma: 128903378
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
I would say from my experience that Sandisk is the overall best brand.
|
Advert | |
|
03-04-2016, 09:55 AM | #18 |
Member
Posts: 11
Karma: 450
Join Date: Jan 2016
Device: kobo touch
|
just switched to a sandisk ultra 8GB and.... no big performance increase of the kobo !
and this card came up well in alot of 4K benchmarks, and the amazon reviews for people using it for raspberry pis were always very positive. so i don't know what the bottleneck here is, but probably the processor or the internal card reader itself, or both. i think there is some increase, though i'd have to do side by side videos to compare. i suppose since i've gone to the hassle of DD'ing the cards over (after running fsck along the way) i should do a few quick videos to really investigate speed changes. but it's certainly nowhere near the speed of an iphone 5, for example Last edited by diskette; 03-04-2016 at 09:57 AM. |
03-04-2016, 05:46 PM | #19 |
Pain in the arse
Posts: 758
Karma: 77856
Join Date: Apr 2013
Device: Kobo Aura One, Kindle 4
|
Maybe because Iphone 5 as 16 GB of RAM at minimum, while Kobo Aura H2O only 4? Furthermore Iphone's CPU is designed by Apple itself for its products and OS. Not considering the huge difference of the software quality.
Last edited by Lucas Malor; 03-04-2016 at 06:18 PM. |
03-05-2016, 03:27 PM | #20 |
Member
Posts: 11
Karma: 450
Join Date: Jan 2016
Device: kobo touch
|
oh yes, it was just a general example to gauge real life perception speed, i didn't mean that they were genuinely that similar in hardware !
i think consumer demand for smartphones being far far higher than for e-readers also means you generally get more power per buck, whereas i'm guessing e-reader processors are more heavily optimized for low battery consumption, as oppose to interface snappiness i'd still like to try and make it faster though, so i think i'll experiment with changing the filesystem to ext |
Advert | |
|
03-05-2016, 03:40 PM | #21 |
Resident Curmudgeon
Posts: 73,970
Karma: 128903378
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
You probably bought a high-speed microSD card. Those are best for larger files. eBook files tend to be smallish files overall. So you might be best with a slower card for better speed with small files.
|
03-05-2016, 10:45 PM | #22 | |
Pain in the arse
Posts: 758
Karma: 77856
Join Date: Apr 2013
Device: Kobo Aura One, Kindle 4
|
Quote:
I'm quite sure the ereaders that Kobo uses load into memory the book once opened. So the only disk I/O operations are at Kobo boot, at book open and when you use the database (writing notes etc). And when you add books of course. So speed disk is not a bottleneck. If you really want to improve the speed of Kobo, I suggest you to learn C |
|
03-06-2016, 12:08 AM | #23 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 24,907
Karma: 47303748
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Device: Kobo:Touch,Glo, AuraH2O, GloHD,AuraONE, ClaraHD, Libra H2O; tolinoepos
|
Quote:
As Lucas said, the device probably loads the full book into memory, so unless it is a very large book, the I/O won't have an affect after the initial opening of the book. It is possible that the load is done for each internal file, so faster I/O might help. There are also writes to the database while reading. The current position is store plus events such as page turns. But, I have no idea when this is done. It could be for every page, or when the book is closed. As you mentioned wanting to improve the browser speed for a particular site, I don't think the user partition is used when browsing. It isn't used for browser cache or anything. If any temporary files are used, they will be on the root partition. That is already ext3. |
|
03-06-2016, 12:27 AM | #24 | |
Pain in the arse
Posts: 758
Karma: 77856
Join Date: Apr 2013
Device: Kobo Aura One, Kindle 4
|
Quote:
Improving browser I/O speed may make sense if you want to use Wikipedia offline, as discussed in other threads. But IMHO the real problem in Kobo performance is 1) the hardware 2) the code quality. Anyway you can try to monitor I/O usage and see if there's really an intensive use that justify the effort. Last edited by Lucas Malor; 03-06-2016 at 12:44 AM. |
|
10-18-2017, 02:42 PM | #25 |
Addict
Posts: 281
Karma: 5262189
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Device: Samsung Tab S5E 12" Tablet
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aura HD 64Gb MicroSD in Kobo Aura HD? | GlynG | Kobo Reader | 23 | 12-26-2015 11:37 PM |