08-14-2013, 03:40 AM | #1 | |
Fully Converged
Posts: 18,163
Karma: 14021202
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Switzerland
Device: Too many to count here.
|
Kindle store: Indies avoid DRM to reach wider audience
Bufo Calvin from the I Love My Kindle blog analyzed the currently top 100 selling e-books in the Kindle store and made an interesting observation:
Quote:
Last edited by Alexander Turcic; 08-14-2013 at 03:44 AM. |
|
08-14-2013, 04:23 AM | #2 |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,460
Karma: 158151390
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
DRM is no big deal for me. I have a Kindle and get most of my books from the Kindle store. I'm quite happy with this arrangement and see no need to change.
|
Advert | |
|
08-14-2013, 05:00 AM | #3 | |
Member
Posts: 15
Karma: 12038
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: iRiver Story
|
Quote:
Be a sheep. When copyrighted items are removed from your Kindle by Amazon, with or without cause, may you be happy then. |
|
08-14-2013, 05:23 AM | #4 |
Fanatic
Posts: 556
Karma: 3531054
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Germany
Device: In use: Pocketbook InkPad 3, Kobo Glo, iPad Air 2
|
For publishers (of books, video games, etc.) it still seems to be counter-intuitive to release their products without copy protections and DRM, because there is that belief that if it can easily be copied, it will be. The video games industry has been making that claim for many years, but it never stopped piracy, nor did it drive companies into bankruptcy, and there is the credible theory that the majority of people who pirate games wouldn't pay for them anyway: they'd just pirate something else that is pirate-able.
It's pretty simple, though. The best protection is the fact that someone paid money for something. Most people who hand over cash for e-books just aren't like to distribute their books, precisely because they paid for them ("and so can others"). More importantly, though, DRM doesn't even help. Those who have multiple devices liberate their books anyway, and those who use only one device don't care either way because DRM or not makes no difference to them. Plus, those who don't want to pay for books find ways around it, either by reading classics or reading in the shadows. The shadows will always exist unless we get a privacy-void Big Brother situation where we can't read books without connecting to an authorization server, and even then someone would probably find ways to extract the text of a book and make it available outside of the controlled environment (especially then). A resource-intense struggle that wastes money and effort. What DRM is good at, though, is discouraging customers from spending money. For example, I spent several hundreds on the iBooks store when I mostly read on the iPad. DRM wasn't a problem, I only used that one device. Then I picked up an e-ink reader, and now suddenly I couldn't read the books I had paid for on an alternate device. The person who provided the means to tackle that problem had retired the project, and suddenly I found myself with enslaved books. My solution? I re-bought some of the e-books that I found essential and I haven't spent another cent on iBooks since, and I won't. (I guess for the publishers of those re-bought books this was a good deal. For the vendor, here: Apple, not so much.) There is also the danger of people developing the mindset of "if I have to do something illegal [circumventing DRM], I may as well do it properly", in which case they then don't spend any money. The more effort it requires to do something that you feel you shouldn't have to do in the first place (here: enabling your books to be read on all your devices) the more likely that is to happen. Luckily for publishers, Alf needs little food and attention. Rambling summarized: Selling e-books without DRM is a plus and probably increases sales, just like the blogger claims. |
08-14-2013, 05:30 AM | #5 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,538
Karma: 264065402
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Taiwan
Device: HP Touchpad, Sony Duo 13, Lumia 920, Kobo Aura HD
|
Quote:
|
|
Advert | |
|
08-14-2013, 05:44 AM | #6 | |
Fanatic
Posts: 556
Karma: 3531054
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Germany
Device: In use: Pocketbook InkPad 3, Kobo Glo, iPad Air 2
|
Quote:
BM's point was that DRM means that you don't really "own" an e-book you buy, only a license to read it, and with specific conditions that could be changed. Amazon can remove the book from your device. Will they? Extremely unlikely. But should they be able to do that after you paid money? |
|
08-14-2013, 05:47 AM | #7 |
Connoisseur
Posts: 57
Karma: 260130
Join Date: Aug 2013
Device: Kindle
|
From an author's point of view, I don't see any advantages to DRM. People who will pirate my books are intent on not spending money on supporting artists. That's how they are and one might as well get over it altogether. If a book is published with DRM, they're just going to wait until the protection is cracked, and even if it were possible to ward off hackers, there would still be the option to take screenshots and run them through OCR. Supposing no geek could find a way to automate the process, it still wouldn't take more than a couple of hours to have a shareable copy available. I also don't want to reduce my readers' option to read books on any of their devices they want. Like reading mainly on a dedicated ereader and being able to have a copy on their smartphone for when they're stuck in their dentist's waiting room.
As a music lover, I wouldn't buy albums in any other form than DRM-free mp3 for the same grounds that I can archive and play them wherever I want; one reason I'll never by an Apple product as long as they maintain their current policy. I can tolerate DRM in video games but it's still a major hassle when I delete a Steam game and then have to re-download several Go's if I want to play it again several month later. I'm a lot more supportive of studios who choose to go DRM free, like CD Projekt RED. They tried fighting piracy at first when they released Witcher 2 but ended up having what seem like a sincere change of heart when they released it without protection on GOG. It's also worth pointing out that like in the book industry, protection can be applied by distributors. |
08-14-2013, 05:59 AM | #8 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,538
Karma: 264065402
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Taiwan
Device: HP Touchpad, Sony Duo 13, Lumia 920, Kobo Aura HD
|
Quote:
Now those that actually had the "1984" book removed from their Kindles got a pretty sweet deal. Anyway, blame the publishers, not Amazon for DRM. Last edited by HansTWN; 08-14-2013 at 06:03 AM. |
|
08-14-2013, 06:11 AM | #9 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
Quote:
|
|
08-14-2013, 06:28 AM | #10 |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,460
Karma: 158151390
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
|
08-14-2013, 06:54 AM | #11 |
Addict
Posts: 239
Karma: 1664052
Join Date: Mar 2011
Device: Kindle 4NT
|
Yet. The day will come when the publishers insist that being able to examine the content of hard drives is necessary to enforce their copyright and some lawyer will create a compelling enough case that a technologically-ignorant judge will grant it.
If the government can already examine many aspects of your life without your permission and without a legitimate court order (kangaroo courts need not apply), what makes you think your hard drive is sacred? |
08-14-2013, 06:58 AM | #12 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
As the article clearly states, it is not up to Amazon whether a book is DRM'ED or not; it is up to the publisher. So they can't choose to abolish DRM.
And as the article points out, indie publishers correctly see DRM-free as added value. So do readers, even those without Pavlovian reactions to the very mention of the term. |
08-14-2013, 07:21 AM | #13 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
|
08-14-2013, 07:27 AM | #14 |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,410
Karma: 305065800
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
|
08-14-2013, 07:32 AM | #15 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Quote:
(That is how the BPHs forced them to submit to the conspiracy and how they forced them to make TTS optional, at publishers' discretion.) They can also lodge a "valid" antitrust complaint with the Feds. Keep an eye on Apple to see why Amazon is careful to steer clear of annoying *them*. Last edited by fjtorres; 08-14-2013 at 07:34 AM. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New ebook store for the Swedish audience | thinkpad | Deals and Resources (No Self-Promotion or Affiliate Links) | 3 | 04-01-2013 04:36 PM |
Why are DRM ebooks evil and why should I avoid them like the plague? | rogerVA | General Discussions | 244 | 04-18-2011 11:13 PM |
Do you avoid DRM ebooks? | jrchase | Amazon Kindle | 38 | 04-05-2011 12:37 AM |
How can you tell if the Kindle Store ebook has DRM? | rock | Kindle Formats | 3 | 12-14-2009 05:55 PM |
iPhone Kindle for Iphone 1.3: For the Wider-World | rhari79 | Apple Devices | 0 | 12-14-2009 11:25 AM |