04-18-2017, 08:59 PM | #16 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,459
Karma: 68781975
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Arkansas
Device: Paperwhite 4
|
I wonder if this isn't a problem more in theory than in fact. I spend a bit of time choosing my next book, usually while nearing the end of my current book, so that by the time I'm finished I have a few books in mind for the next one. I can't recall ever even looking at who published it during this decision process. I don't pick many bad ones.
I scan the reader reviews on Amazon and sometimes on Goodreads and sometimes on Kobo and B&N. I don't let the reviewers pick my books but sometimes I'll let them warn me away from a book. More often I judge by the tone and intelligence of the review than by whether they liked the book. This seems to be pretty helpful. I also read the online samples at Amazon. The "Look Inside" sample, not the downloadable one. Usually the first few paragraphs tell me a lot. Sometimes I'll google a book and get a variety of opinions on it, and I'll sometimes search Youtube for reviews. A lot of the books I choose are from references made in these reviews. Reviewers will often mention other books that I'll look into. I can't really recall looking at the publisher except in a few instances where I found a badly edited book, usually one that was badly proofed after OCR'ing. I used to proof for Gutenberg and I recognize those mistakes. In most of these cases, maybe all of them, they were done by big publishers. I read a lot of older books and that's who does older books. I just don't think there's a problem finding good books. I rarely think in terms of avoiding bad books. I think I've begun one book in the past couple of years that was bad enough that I didn't finish it. The guys writing seemed fine and the grammar and spelling were good but the situations just didn't make much sense so I stopped reading it. That book was "The Neon Lawyer" by Victor Methos, published by Thomas & Mercer. I have no idea if they're part of a big publisher. I have read a few books in the past couple of years that I might not have read if I'd known more what to expect, but none of those were so bad I lament reading them. At worse they were just okay. I do agree that, at least in principle, having a gatekeeper seems like a good idea. But these days with so many resources available to find good books I'm not sure there's a lot of practical need for someone to cull them and I think there's so many benefits from letting people publish whatever they want that I like things the way they are. Ultimately readers are the only ones qualified pick what we want to read. Barry |
04-18-2017, 09:05 PM | #17 | |
Just a Yellow Smiley.
Posts: 19,161
Karma: 83862859
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Texas
Device: K4, K5, fire, kobo, galaxy
|
Quote:
|
|
04-18-2017, 09:05 PM | #18 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,552
Karma: 193191846
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Other than my past favorite authors, I rarely know who published (or HOW they published) the books I decide to read. I don't wade in any pools. I hear what people are talking about, I see what people whose opinions I trust are reading on Goodreads. Then if something piques my interest, I check out the premise and make a decision. "Dreck" almost never makes it onto my radar.
I don't need traditional gatekeepers. Reviews, my friends, and normal conversation takes care of that role for me. I don't give the slightest hoot how a book gets to market. If it's up my alley (and it's of sufficient quality) someone will mention it. I never waded "blind" into traditionally published books before the self-publishing boom, so I fail to see why I (or anyone) would want to do so with KDP titles. Cream rises (and gets talked about). Last edited by DiapDealer; 04-18-2017 at 09:13 PM. |
04-18-2017, 09:32 PM | #19 | |
Award-Winning Participant
Posts: 7,318
Karma: 67930154
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
|
It's often enough a problem in fact, I assure you. Not insurmountable and sometimes very minor, but real enough to discuss.
Quote:
Cuz "let anyone publish anything" has resulted, in fact, in just about anyone publishing just about anything, and "readers are the only ones qualified to pick" can be an overwhelming, frustrating and wasteful endeavor. Some tools, if not a guide, are not counter to the new order. |
|
04-18-2017, 09:42 PM | #20 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 12,171
Karma: 73448616
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto
Device: Nexus 7, Clara, Touch, Tolino EPOS
|
Quote:
|
|
04-18-2017, 09:57 PM | #21 | |
Just a Yellow Smiley.
Posts: 19,161
Karma: 83862859
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Texas
Device: K4, K5, fire, kobo, galaxy
|
Quote:
It was this one. https://www.amazon.com/Microwave-Coo...dp/B071D8B745/ Same author: same book: different title and ASIN. |
|
04-18-2017, 10:09 PM | #22 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
|
Cooking, self-help etc. are often the chosen tools of Amazon scammers. I'd imagine it's not too hard to exclude the really bad ones.
As for the real dreck in self-published books? You are not picking at random. They can be easily eliminated as possible choices and are by many. I really see this as a storm in a teacup. |
04-18-2017, 10:18 PM | #23 | ||
Award-Winning Participant
Posts: 7,318
Karma: 67930154
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-18-2017, 10:39 PM | #24 | |
Just a Yellow Smiley.
Posts: 19,161
Karma: 83862859
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Texas
Device: K4, K5, fire, kobo, galaxy
|
Quote:
That is a dead give away to a scamlet. Luckily that is usually the first words in a bad book. Or you get backwards English. Though I have to admit sometimes the word choice is hilarious. |
|
04-18-2017, 11:02 PM | #25 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
|
I outlined how I picked my ebooks in the earlier thread I linked to, and others outlined their methods. You want to confine this thread to discussion of "basic editorial and grammatical gatekeeping". This is a very low bar to begin with. Yes, anecdotally there are and logically one would expect a not insignificant number of self-published books which do not meet even this bar. Fortunately unless you are picking at random you will never encounter most of these. Depending on the method you use to pick, most are not in the genres or type of books you like, or are not prominent enough to be "discovered" by you or are not recommended by anyone you are inclined to rely upon. Others you may not be interested after reading a synopsis. Of the few that remain on your radar, I suggest that reading a sample will eliminate the vast majority. With the bar set this low, I doubt the books which constitute illegible, incoherent garbage will require reading more than a paragraph or two to identify. This does not of course mean that they will be immortal works of prose nor that you will enjoy them. But that is outside what you want to discuss in this thread.
And if you find that you can't do this, by all means stick to the traditionally published books. Last edited by darryl; 04-18-2017 at 11:06 PM. |
04-18-2017, 11:05 PM | #26 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
|
Double post omitted.
|
04-18-2017, 11:28 PM | #27 | ||
Award-Winning Participant
Posts: 7,318
Karma: 67930154
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
It's probably not a surprise that this thread was prompted by my wading through garbage when I tried to search for some new books in genres and categories I like. (I happened to be looking for business books today, but it's happened with sf too.). Quote:
Perhaps the preferred reviewer/recommender the new gatekeeper. Wonder how they found the book? I am indeed talking about a low bar here, but i recognize that a recommendation of good books probably comes with the automatic bonus of them being non-jibberish, so that's a good solution if you have a trusted recommender. |
||
04-18-2017, 11:41 PM | #28 |
Resident Curmudgeon
Posts: 74,027
Karma: 129333114
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
One thing I avoid is a self-published book where the cover looks like Photoshop barfed.
Last edited by JSWolf; 04-18-2017 at 11:47 PM. |
04-19-2017, 12:17 AM | #29 |
Just a Yellow Smiley.
Posts: 19,161
Karma: 83862859
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Texas
Device: K4, K5, fire, kobo, galaxy
|
|
04-19-2017, 12:28 AM | #30 | ||
Wizard
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
|
Quote:
Quote:
At the risk of seeming a bit pedantic, I don't think the word "gatekeeper" is accurate here. The gates are well and truly breached and the walls have crumbled. Anyone of a mind to can now publish and does. No one can keep them out. The gatekeepers whose decisions meant a book or author would never even be published (or perhaps only published through a vanity press) and would therefore effectively not be available, are gone, and I don't miss them. There are many now seeking to step in and offer some of the services previously provided by gatekeepers, including curator-ship, but now on the basis of readers voluntarily using their services. Not all are strictly above board. Many of these are in fact marketing services with vested interests. But participation is up to the reader. And unlikely successes happen, of worthy books and otherwise. This is indeed a problem. The algorithms used by Amazon, Kobo and others are far from perfect. Many of the newsletter/email type services are paid promotions. Reviews are only valuable if the reviewer shares your tastes. I do believe, however, that with such a low bar a very brief read of a sample, particularly a random one, will eliminate all but a small number of such books from contention. Last edited by darryl; 04-19-2017 at 12:30 AM. |
||
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sorting the Wheat from the Chaff - Selecting "New Market" EBooks | darryl | General Discussions | 18 | 09-11-2014 09:55 PM |
Free (nook/Kindle/+2 DRM-free/Sony) Gatekeeper by Debra Glass [Paranormal Romance] | ATDrake | Deals and Resources (No Self-Promotion or Affiliate Links) | 2 | 02-24-2012 04:13 PM |
Indie Books - Separate the wheat from the chaff? | outlander78 | General Discussions | 31 | 01-19-2011 02:48 PM |
Seperating the Wheat from the Chaff | kennyc | Reading Recommendations | 94 | 09-12-2009 06:36 PM |
First filling | mnester | iRex | 1 | 09-21-2006 08:10 AM |