02-08-2013, 01:49 AM | #211 |
Man Who Stares at Books
Posts: 1,816
Karma: 10606722
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: 50th State, USA. Also, PA, NY, CA, and elsewhere.
Device: All of the Above
|
One might say that Science Fiction is an acquired taste. The field is not as exploitative or sappy as romantic storywriting. The number of authors who have made it in SF is actually small, when you think about it. Every one of the writers in Silverberg's anthology, Science Fiction Hall of Fame, Volume One, 1929–1964, is well known to me.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sci...9%E2%80%931964 Certainly Asimov belongs in the same class of writers as Heinlein, del Rey, Bester, etc. Isaac may not be in the same league as Sturgeon, but, that is a matter of personal preference. Because SF does not aspire to the lofty ideals of great literature, the average fan is satisfied with a good plot and mild amusement. SF was not haute cuisine, nor was it nouvelle cuisine. That was the credo Asimov followed, and who can blame him? Was the world ready for esoteric, new wave Sci Fi when he was writing? Yes, and no. Thomas Disch was brilliant and ahead of his time. But not in a commercial sense, meaning he never raked in the big bucks like Asimov or Bradbury. Possibly, the operative word was accessible. Drift a little, but not too far afield. If China Mieville were writing in 1950, he would have been shunned. Incomprehensible, way too avant garde. Could Asimov have altered his writing style over the years? Not after he tasted fame and publicity. That would be like asking Stephen King to pen The Brothers Karamazov. Rather than critique Asimov for what he wasn't, let's just say there are many writers in the universe to read besides this one man. Asimov is neither overrated or underrated. After all, he did not get a Nobel prize, did he? Try other authors, even Doris Lessing. No comment on her. Why? Because it takes a lot of reading to tell how good or important a writer may be, in his/her lifetime. |
02-08-2013, 10:10 AM | #212 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 19,226
Karma: 67780237
Join Date: Jul 2011
Device: none
|
I don't know, I'm reading Golem100 by Alfred Bester and its plenty exploitative in a cheesy B-science fiction movie way. I have to say, I picked it for a laugh and it's been a quality selection based on that requirement.
|
Advert | |
|
02-08-2013, 10:41 AM | #213 |
Philosopher
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
|
His Zeroth Law of Robotics does open the door for this. If Robots may violate the First Law if, in the Robot's opinion, it is necessary to protect humanity, then the robots could do pretty much anything, depending on their definition of harm to humanity.
|
02-08-2013, 10:56 AM | #214 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 19,226
Karma: 67780237
Join Date: Jul 2011
Device: none
|
All you need to do is redefine humanity and our kettle is cooked. It's been the premise behind a lot of stories and movies.
|
02-08-2013, 11:27 AM | #215 |
Aging Positronic Brain
Posts: 633
Karma: 2155452
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Aurora (when off-Earth)
Device: Amazon Oasis; iPhone, iPad Mini
|
|
Advert | |
|
02-08-2013, 11:38 AM | #216 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 19,226
Karma: 67780237
Join Date: Jul 2011
Device: none
|
I want/need to read Asimov. One of these days. One of these days.
|
02-08-2013, 11:40 AM | #217 |
Philosopher
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
|
There were stories where the Robots were programmed with restricted definitions of human. That affects the First Law.
Asimov compared his three laws to tools: 1) A tool must not be dangerous to its user 2) A tool must perform its function 3) A tool must be reliable We would want an automated drill to stop if there is a person in its way, but as long as the work area is clear, we want the drill to do its job. And we want it not to break down, but that's subordinate. We might need to use the tool even if it breaks it, depending on how urgent the task is. Asimov's Laws are essentially the same idea, we want the Robot not to hurt people, to obey orders so as it can do so without hurting people and to protect itself so long as doing so doesn't harm people or violate orders. There are tricky things with robots, you probably don't want the robot obeying just anyone's orders. Otherwise, people would order the robot to come home with them. The robot would have to come out of the box prepared to take orders from only its owner (and from customer support). The first law gets tricky. You wouldn't want the robot to restrict voluntary actions, a robot which forbade humans from playing sports wouldn't be a good robot. The Zeroth Law gets really problematic. It is difficult to imagine the horror of the Black Death. But those who survived found that their labor was suddenly much more valuable, and the status of peasants improved. Suppose they had robots that could cure the Black Death. With the Zeroth Law, the robots could decide that humanity was better off with the Black Death than without it. The First Law would require the robots to provide the cure. The Zeroth Law would allow them to withhold it. We might want a robot to interfere with a mugger, even if it hurts the mugger, but we probably wouldn't want a robot to be taking such big matters into their own hands. We benefited from the Black Death, but to choose the Black Death would be horrific. |
02-09-2013, 07:30 AM | #218 |
The Dank Side of the Moon
Posts: 35,872
Karma: 118716293
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Device: Kindle2; Kindle Fire
|
I think James Joyce is more over-rated than Asimov by far!
Last edited by kennyc; 02-11-2013 at 01:23 PM. |
02-09-2013, 07:33 AM | #219 |
The Dank Side of the Moon
Posts: 35,872
Karma: 118716293
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Device: Kindle2; Kindle Fire
|
|
02-09-2013, 07:33 AM | #220 |
The Dank Side of the Moon
Posts: 35,872
Karma: 118716293
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Device: Kindle2; Kindle Fire
|
|
02-09-2013, 10:22 AM | #221 |
Philosopher
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
|
|
02-09-2013, 10:37 AM | #222 |
The Dank Side of the Moon
Posts: 35,872
Karma: 118716293
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Device: Kindle2; Kindle Fire
|
He did.
|
02-09-2013, 01:20 PM | #223 | ||
Grand Master of Flowers
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
|
Quote:
Quote:
Yeah, that was kind of his "comeback novel after 25 years or whatever of not writing SF; I like his earlier stuff better. |
||
02-09-2013, 02:43 PM | #224 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,888
Karma: 5875940
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: PRS505, 600, 350, 650, Nexus 7, Note III, iPad 4 etc
|
You can't include "The Handmaiden's Tale" in a discussion involving SF, it isn't SF as Margaret Atwood went to great lengths to say...
|
02-09-2013, 03:41 PM | #225 |
Philosopher
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
|
She can say whatever she wants of course. But attempting to lift it out of the mire of science fiction, as some people see it, doesn't mean it isn't science fiction. It reminds me of an old joke: how many legs does a dog have if you call a tail a leg. Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Today is the birthday of Isaac Asimov | kennyc | Reading Recommendations | 11 | 01-11-2013 04:48 PM |
Isaac Asimov - Foundation Series Help | pakiyabhai | Reading Recommendations | 31 | 11-26-2010 12:39 AM |
Science Fiction Asimov, Isaac: Youth, v1, 11 March 2010. | Patricia | BBeB/LRF Books (offline) | 2 | 03-30-2010 07:11 PM |
Science Fiction Asimov, Isaac: Youth, v1, 11 March 2010. | Patricia | IMP Books (offline) | 0 | 03-10-2010 10:33 PM |
Discuss: The Gods Themselves by Isaac Asimov | astrodad | Reading Recommendations | 8 | 06-02-2008 03:41 PM |