Unutterably Silly Forum Game: Last person to post here wins!

[beachwanderer]

Nay.

That leaves me

Barking

Good evening, gentlemen.

[afa]

And a good evening to you, sir!

[LazyScot]

Originally Posted by beachwanderer

Barking.

well in that case I'll raise you:

Westminster

[Bilbo1967]

Originally Posted by LazyScot

well in that case I'll raise you:

Westminster

Well, there are only three legal moves after Westminster so I'll go with the least obvious;

Holborn

[afa]

Huh..?

[TGS]

Originally Posted by Bilbo1967

Well, there are only three legal moves after Westminster so I'll go with the least obvious;

Holborn

Don't even think about that move:

Notting Hill Gate

[pdurrant]

Really? but with the previous two plays, and since it's still Monday here, that leaves me with....

Mornington Crescent!


Good game, guys. I had no idea there were so many aficionados of Mornington Crescent here.

[pholy]

Well, I guess you won that game within the game (I'm not sure...)


But I'm winning the real game!

[beachwanderer]

Originally Posted by pdurrant

Really? but with the previous two plays, and since it's still Monday here, that leaves me with....

Mornington Crescent!

Good game, guys. I had no idea there were so many aficionados of Mornington Crescent here.

Congratulations!

And thanks @all

1) for the kindness not to critize my second (probably illegal) move too much.
2) for the chance to join in with some really experienced grand masters of the game.

[pdurrant]

As pholy says, the game has been won, but the game goes on. I'm winning.

Say — do you guys know about The Game? I've just lost The Game, and so I have to tell you lot that I've lost it. Which of course, causes you lot to all lose The Game too. Because you lose The Game when you remember The Game, at which point you have to announce that you've lost The Game, and everyone around you loses too.

[TGS]

Did you not hear about the Gerald Nabbarro Convention on Mornington Crescent.

Section 5, Subsection iii: No person winning a game of Mornington Crescent may take any further part in any other game of which the aforementioned won game of Mornington Crescent was a part.

I think that means you pdurrant. A pity since you were doing so well; still, rules is rules.

[pdurrant]

You're forgetting that the whole of section 5 only applies when there isn't an 'r' in the month.

I win.

[LazyScot]

I thought section 5 was covered by section 8, which clearly stated it could not be disclosed unless it's prior illegal disclosure had occured, in which case the only use of its disclosure was to facilitate the undisclosure the illegal disclosure.

I'd thought that this coverage was to prevent the inadverent case when playing intra-temporarilly where a looping game was won during the on-going play of the same game, resulting in the exclusion of the player from the game he'd just one. This in-advertent temporal paradox itself cased temporal fragmentation and a loss of mental integrity as the remaining players get trapped in a game of diminishing options until the resultant game self imploded in the so-called Morden-Paradox.

[pdurrant]

Nicely argued.

In summary: I win.

[Bilbo1967]

Originally Posted by pdurrant

Nicely argued.

In summary: I win.

Or not!

Congratulations on the Mornington Crescent win though - nicely played