![]() |
#121 | |
Maria Schneider
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,746
Karma: 26439330
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Device: 3g Kindle Keyboard
|
Quote:
So assuming that books from back then are suddenly cheaper, the COST to me as a reader is that any time you push prices down on goods, it will push prices down on current goods (or could.) That sounds great to me as a reader until my favorite writers stop writing. Those writers writing today may not be inclined to continue a series (even if they want to, their publisher may say, sorry, not enough sales.) I've already had multiple series cancelled that I was enjoying and at least one writer who hasn't written in years. It's just not a viable career for many a writer. I've already seen some of this "lack of buying" due to all the freebies. I'm not saying the world owes me any market. I put out a product. I put a price on it. I think it's a fair price and because I don't put DRM on it, I have to trust the reader to be honest--and either pay it because they want the book or pass on it because it isn't worth the few bucks to them. If enough people decide it isn't worth a few bucks, then I'll eventually move on to something else. I don't think it's a terrible thing to have copyright protection that keeps (or may keep) some other person from copying characters/phrases from my novels, pasting the entire thing into a new cover and selling it, etc. I view copyright as: If you don't want to pay for it, don't. But I don't think copyright HURTS any reader because there are multiple ways to obtain materials for reasonable costs that include a price tag of zero. I think lack of copyright or too short of a copyright could actually hurt writers and readers in the long run. If current readers want the convenience of the latest and greatest technology (ebooks) I don't see any reason the owners shouldn't be protected and make a buck or two. If readers don't want to pay for it, don't. And some older books? Get them the old fashioned way by buying used or whatever other legal means is available. I'm not for price-gouging, but no one is going to produce other goods for me for free and I really don't think copyright is harmful to readers because there are multiple ways to get the good for a reasonable price. In the old days it was sometimes impossible to find a book. With the internet, so much more is available. It may not be in the form I want or convenient, but generally speaking I can find it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#122 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,594
Karma: 21245891
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo Libra h20, Paperwhite 2017, Phone & Tablet w Moonreader
|
Quote:
Well, the reverse is true, too. If I got lucky and somehow, wrote one giant hit of a novel that everyone likes... and constantly made millions because people couldn't stop buying my one masterpiece, (guaranteed royalties until I died and beyond) why would I need to create more? I'd be rolling in money and could have retired and bought a nice house before reaching 25. That would be however if money were the *deciding* factor on whether or not I wrote. In that novel by Nick Hornby "About a Boy" the lead character Will is a caricature of a man who has never had a job because "My dad wrote a Christmas Carol once and I live off the royalties". Now, that was a fiction (It's been a while since I read the book, but I own the movie on DVD) but illustrates a point. I see people who work in real-time jobs who need to come up with creative ideas on a daily basis in order to get paid for their work. Their creativity has a shelf-life, and they need to keep producing to get more money. This is only my opinion, because I'm on the "I wish I could afford to buy more books" end of things, and I am like a kid in a candy store at PG's library, saving the bought stuff for things I theoretically "can't live without".... so consider the source. Having a shorter copyright would definitely be appreciated, but I've been able to read books thus far, so in the end, but business side of things isn't up to me. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#123 |
Maria Schneider
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,746
Karma: 26439330
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Device: 3g Kindle Keyboard
|
By the way, in reference to innovation still occurring and being quite healthy under older copyright rules or in cases where copyright/patents didn't exist at all--it should be noted that back in earlier days, it was much, much more difficult to "copy" or redistribute goods. It took a lot more work to take a book (in or out of copyright) and reproduce it. The lack if technology made theft or redistribution unlikely. So innovation and money-making could occur without as much threat as exists today.
The same holds true with patents on technology or drugs. The knowledge to recreate a drug was difficult to come by. The ability to copy car technology was not easy to come by. The sheer lack of being able to share intelligence protected innovators for a time. These days, not so much. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#124 | |||||
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,187
Karma: 25133758
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3 (Past: Kobo Mini, PEZ, PRS-505, Clié)
|
Quote:
Would modern romance writers be glutting the market, if the entire backlog of romance books were widely available at low cost? Some would probably sell well--trends in literature are different now--but the majority of the midlist in most genres would probably be unable to compete with the weight of history. I don't think this is a bad thing. The public shouldn't be paying romance writers to re-invent the third wheel just because the last hundred times that story was done, it wasn't reprinted and fell into obscurity. Maybe if writers had to produce *new* situations, characters, and snappy dialog, the profession would get more respect--and the authors who were able to produce a new twist on longstanding themes would get paid more. Quote:
(That's exaggerated for effect. I am not saying that authors who've had to give up on their careers are not as good as EL James. I *am* saying that "find customers" is an essential part of a writer's career... and I don't support the idea of "remove other options from potential customers" as a fair and reasonable way to go about that.) Quote:
Quote:
(Again: exaggerating for effect; not saying you directly meant that.) Quote:
Almost none--maybe none--of John Kenneth Galbraith's books are legitimately available as ebooks. Most are out of print. I suppose it's fine that people who need large-text versions or audiobooks wait another 70 years to read his books. |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#125 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,528
Karma: 37057604
Join Date: Jan 2008
Device: Pocketbook
|
Quote:
When gunpowder became used for weapontry, chivalry died. Many people were horrified at the time, but nothing they could do could stop it's death, except for getting rid of gunpowder. In Japan, they had the same problem, they did get rid of gunpowder, and stayed isolated, without gunpowder for 2 centuries. Do you want to shut the doors to the rest of the world and scrap all the computers, to keep your favorite author writing? Think about it... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#126 | |
Basculocolpic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 4,356
Karma: 20181319
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sweden
Device: Kindle 3 WiFi, Kindle 4SO, Kindle for Android, Sony PRS-350 and PRS-T1
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#127 |
Bookaholic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 14,391
Karma: 54969924
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Minnesota
Device: iPad Mini 4, AuraHD, iPhone XR +
|
What would be wrong with a 28 year renewable copyright that can be renewed throughout the life of the creator and then once by the creators estate after death?
I know there are some niche books I'd like to get ahold of for personal research purposes that were printed only once decades ago that can only be had for $400-$500+ for a beat up copy, IF you can find one at all. If the copyright on those had been allowed to expire due to lack of renewal there would be a better chance at them being accessible now. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#128 | |
Autism Spectrum Disorder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,212
Karma: 6244877
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Coastal Texas
Device: Android Phone
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#129 |
Member Retired
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,999
Karma: 11348924
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Limbo
Device: none
|
Reducing (c) to 28 years would be good for consumers. Therefore I support it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#130 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,409
Karma: 4132096
Join Date: Sep 2008
Device: Kindle Paperwhite/iOS Kindle App
|
To me, it's not an issue of engaging in this action or that one in order to make the work available for free to readers. It's about freeing it up for innovation by others as part of our shared cultural heritage. For instance, Gregory Maguire could not have written Wicked if he was not able to draw upon the public domain classic Wizard of Oz.
And it's also a reciprocal respect issue: as you, the writer, were enriched during your education by these other authors and were free to draw upon their public domain materials for this sort of creative adaptation, so should other writers down the line be able to benefit from and use your creative works when they enter the public domain. Even Shakespeare drew upon other sources. It's part of creative life. You take, but then you give back later. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#131 | |
You kids get off my lawn!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 4,220
Karma: 73492664
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Device: Oasis 2 and Libra H2O and half a dozen older models I can't let go of
|
Quote:
I for one don't particularly care if Disney keeps an everlasting copyright on Mickey Mouse. Let them keep renewing it. But allow all those forgotten "orphaned" works out to become of interest to some, just because they'd then be possibly available for free. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#132 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,592
Karma: 4290425
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Foristell, Missouri, USA
Device: Nokia N800, PRS-505, Nook STR Glowlight, Kindle 3, Kobo Libra 2
|
Quote:
The only ones who really can make a profit from it are the prolific ones, and usually only the ones who are able to do that are the ones who manage to be famous. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#133 | ||
Professional Contrarian
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,045
Karma: 3289631
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: Kindle 4 No Touchie
|
Quote:
Quote:
In fact, content creators in the US can file to reclaim their copyrights 35 years after publication, if the work was created after 1978 and certain other conditions are met. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#134 | |
Maria Schneider
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,746
Karma: 26439330
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Device: 3g Kindle Keyboard
|
Quote:
My library is fairly small so a lot of what I read is interlibrary loan--and that costs me 2.50 per book. As for most of this, I'll just have to respectfully disagree. I think it's okay to protect the copyright holder for at least a lifetime if not longer. Saying it isn't public domain does not mean the public doesn't have access (as someone above said that I gained from previous works and built upon that--well those works would still be available for me to purchase. Just because they aren't public domain doesn't mean I don't have access to them.) I value books and I value the work that went into them. I don't mind paying something for them. I pay taxes to the library and they buy books. That helps support authors, publishers and innovators. As for my favorites, and whether older stuff would be my favorites--I have access to even older works now whether they are public domain or not. There's plenty of older stuff out there, some of if PD and some not. And in my case making it public domain would not encourage me to seek it out. It's a recommendation that causes me to seek out a work and the act of paying for it would not keep me from accessing it, assuming it's a fairly accessible fee. If it is not, I will find something else to read and wish luck and happiness on those who can afford the price--just like I might want to drive an Aston Martin or a Lexus, but won't be doing that. I hold no ill will that it's not in my budget, nor do I think that the technology or the car is owed to me as a "public" domain right. It's fine with me if people want to read only pubic domain works, but it's also fine with me if other authors/writers/publishers attempt to sell that work. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#135 | |
Autism Spectrum Disorder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,212
Karma: 6244877
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Coastal Texas
Device: Android Phone
|
Quote:
Not living within the city limits, the only way I could get access to some of the more entertaining books was that way, because the city library kept denying my library card application. Never mind the fact that the city surrounded me on all four sides. If I'd had to pay for that, the parents would've probably nixed it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ebooks for Libraries - A Petition | Meemo | General Discussions | 7 | 05-06-2012 03:00 PM |
Tablet petition for NC/NT keyboard/case | Marseille | Nook Color & Nook Tablet | 3 | 03-29-2012 10:41 AM |
Petition regarding ACTA | Sil_liS | News | 31 | 03-04-2012 05:20 AM |
UK ebook VAT petition | pdurrant | General Discussions | 27 | 09-29-2011 07:13 PM |
In Copyright? - Copyright Renewal Database launched | Alexander Turcic | News | 26 | 07-09-2008 09:36 AM |