Register Guidelines E-Books Today's Posts Search

Go Back   MobileRead Forums > E-Book General > News

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-27-2010, 06:33 PM   #106
Elfwreck
Grand Sorcerer
Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Elfwreck ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Elfwreck's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,187
Karma: 25133758
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3 (Past: Kobo Mini, PEZ, PRS-505, Clié)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pardoz View Post
5-6 readers per physical book has been the accepted industry rule of thumb for years (long before ebooks came along). Not sure where the figure originated or if it's based on anything more than a WAG, though.
I've heard of it before. Know of any sources that claim it? Like, articles about publishers where they mention using that as a rule of thumb to gauge market interest or number of suspected readers?

I want to put together a nice rant about one of the big problems with ebooks--no convenient way to give one to a friend when you're done--and it'd help to have *any* confirmation that publishers know very well that 1purchase=1reader has never been the expected norm.
Elfwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 07:18 PM   #107
DaleDe
Grand Sorcerer
DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DaleDe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DaleDe's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,470
Karma: 13095790
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Grass Valley, CA
Device: EB 1150, EZ Reader, Literati, iPad 2 & Air 2, iPhone 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demented View Post
I've been wondering about the semantic wording of the copy right laws. Technically it's perfectly legal for me to copy a DRM'd(or non-drm'd) work that I own and put it in as many places as I want on my computers or storage devices. So copying a copyrighted work isn't illegal, it is distributing the work that is illegal. Reading a copyrighted work that I don't own can't be illegal because we're allowed to do that every time we walk into a book store or using a friends copy of the work. So how can downloading a copyrighted file and reading it be 'illegal'. Shouldn't the act of distributing the file be the only illegal action?
The word copyright predates eBooks and electronic documents by hundreds of years. It originally was used to refer to the ability to either manually copy text or later to use a copy machine to make copies of test and refers to the limits to these tasks as well as the ability of the copyright owner to be able to license copies of their works.

What you are talking about is particular to the ability to make a backup copy of an electronic file which is fairly new in the grand scheme of things and it not covered specifically by copyright but rather a court ruling in the USA and is not a universal right but depends on where you live in the world.

Copyright on the other hand is a pretty much recognized legal right throughout the civilized world although the interpretation and length of protection differs from country to country.

Dale
DaleDe is offline   Reply With Quote
Advert
Old 01-27-2010, 07:53 PM   #108
calvin-c
Guru
calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 787
Karma: 1575310
Join Date: Jul 2009
Device: Moon+ Pro
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demented View Post
I've been wondering about the semantic wording of the copy right laws. Technically it's perfectly legal for me to copy a DRM'd(or non-drm'd) work that I own and put it in as many places as I want on my computers or storage devices. So copying a copyrighted work isn't illegal, it is distributing the work that is illegal. Reading a copyrighted work that I don't own can't be illegal because we're allowed to do that every time we walk into a book store or using a friends copy of the work. So how can downloading a copyrighted file and reading it be 'illegal'. Shouldn't the act of distributing the file be the only illegal action?
First, there's quite a bit of the new possibilities that haven't been tested in court-so everybody who's saying "yes, it's legal" or "no, it's illegal" is voicing their opinion only. (That includes me.) For instance, reading a web site involves making a copy-but that's been ruled legal because it's (supposedly) a temporary copy only.

Second, much of the difference of opinion stems from a conflict in the law. Copyright law (interpreted by court cases) generally allows you to 'media-shift' a copy you own, for your own use-not for distribution. But the DMCA declares that it's illegal to circumvent copy-protection such as DRM, which makes it illegal to do something that copyright law says it's legal to do. Conflict-which law takes precedence?

As far as I know, that question has yet to be answered by the court system, so again, different people have different opinions. (I will note that other parts of the DMCA have been ruled unconstitutional however.)

So, does that answer your question about why it's both legal & illegal to make a copy, whether your distribute it or not?
calvin-c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 07:56 PM   #109
nekokami
fruminous edugeek
nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
nekokami's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,745
Karma: 551260
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northeast US
Device: iPad, eBw 1150
Quote:
Originally Posted by troymc View Post
I agree. It's difficult to find the middle-ground in such a polarized discussion. Even if the polarization is based on a false dichotomy.... when the argument is polarized, the feeling is that you have to be on one side or the other. And, those on the margins end up being pushed towards or willingly moving to one pole or the other even if it doesn't really represent their true position.
Well-said! (And welcome to Mobileread!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleDe View Post
The word copyright predates eBooks and electronic documents by hundreds of years. It originally was used to refer to the ability to either manually copy text or later to use a copy machine to make copies of test and refers to the limits to these tasks as well as the ability of the copyright owner to be able to license copies of their works.
Is that right? The Statute of Anne dates to approximately 1709, well after the introduction of movable type in Europe (1436-1450). I wasn't aware that copyright had ever been used to refer to manual copies.
nekokami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 08:40 PM   #110
BooksForABuck
Zealot
BooksForABuck gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'BooksForABuck gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'BooksForABuck gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'BooksForABuck gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'BooksForABuck gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'BooksForABuck gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'BooksForABuck gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'BooksForABuck gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'BooksForABuck gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'BooksForABuck gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'BooksForABuck gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'
 
Posts: 123
Karma: 150001
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Long Beach, CA
Device: Color Nook, Kindle 2, Palm III, eBookWise, HP Jornada
Regarding geographical issues,
Authors assign geographic rights to publishers. A publisher with, say, North American rights, has paid for those rights. If a publisher selling out of, say, India with India-only rights were to sell in the US, he'd essentially be selling something he didn't own. In contrast, if a corporation goes to Mexico and hires Mexican workers, he's buying something that the sellers legally own. As consumers, of course, we are free to look for that 'made in the USA' label. It isn't the same, however, when it comes to rights-based sales.

Rob Preece
BooksForABuck.com
BooksForABuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Advert
Old 01-27-2010, 08:44 PM   #111
nekokami
fruminous edugeek
nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nekokami ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
nekokami's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,745
Karma: 551260
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northeast US
Device: iPad, eBw 1150
These days I'm not sure that kind of contract makes sense. The books sold in the US are usually printed in China or India anyway, and people from all over the world can discover and purchase books online. Perhaps authors (or agents) ought to be thinking about selling electronic rights only as a worldwide block.
nekokami is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 09:05 PM   #112
asjogren
Addict
asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.
 
Posts: 266
Karma: 1378
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Seattle / San Carlos, Sonora, Mexico
Device: Kindle & WiFi Nook & PocketBook IQ
"A publisher with, say, North American rights, has paid for those rights. If a publisher selling out of, say, India with India-only rights were to sell in the US, he'd essentially be selling something he didn't own."

Yet, I can travel and buy a book where the publisher has no rights to sell in my home country.

Why is it OK when I travel physically, and not via the Internet? The Industry is trying to force fit an archaic model. And in doing so, making customers angry and foregoing sales. It is STUPID.

If the industry still wants to partition the marketplace, then LANGUAGE is the most appropriate delineation. And even then, I think it is a mistake.
asjogren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 09:19 PM   #113
Dulin's Books
Wizard
Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dulin's Books ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,806
Karma: 13500000
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Device: Boox PB360 etc etc etc
Quote:
Originally Posted by asjogren View Post

Why is it OK when I travel physically, and not via the Internet? The Industry is trying to force fit an archaic model. And in doing so, making customers angry and foregoing sales. It is STUPID.
It's to protect jobs for resellers et al in the respective countries/regions. If there were no geographic restrictions then ebook sellers in countries where it is expensive to do business would go out of business from competition by those in other countries where the cost of business is less.
Dulin's Books is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 09:26 PM   #114
Mitchll
Cave Dweller
Mitchll once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.Mitchll once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.Mitchll once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.Mitchll once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.Mitchll once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.Mitchll once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.Mitchll once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.Mitchll once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.Mitchll once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.Mitchll once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.Mitchll once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.
 
Mitchll's Avatar
 
Posts: 220
Karma: 1986
Join Date: Oct 2006
Device: Ipad Sony reader prs-505 prs-900
All this is blather....there is no justification for theft of a literary work, whether it is the failure to return a book to the library, or walking out of the store with a book under your coat.

On the other hand, claiming 9,000,000 or some equally absurd or uncheckable number of ebooks being pirated as a denial of income to authors or publishers is equally absurd. These hardworking folks gain no further compensation when I buy a used book or borrow a book from a friend or library. It's just that ebooks are easier to lend or recirculate.

That's no less progress than the printing press allowing multi copies of "rare" or "sacred" texts done by monks on scrolls.
Mitchll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 10:19 PM   #115
Demented
Connoisseur
Demented began at the beginning.
 
Posts: 66
Karma: 10
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Baton Rouge
Device: DR800SG, Nook, Cybook Original
What I'm asking is in what law does it state that it is illegal for me to download or read a copyrighted work that I haven't purchased. People do it all the time by loaning books or watching other peoples DVD's. I understand that it illegal to distribute copyrighted works, but in the act of downloading a book from a file share or whatever, what law am I breaking. Even if you break it down on a purely physical level. The distributor is sending me the bytes and I am saving them. At no point am I 'cloning' the file. As far as I know, the only prosecutions have been targeted at people who made files available for download, not the actual consumer side of the equation. In fact, I've had the publisher give away non-drm'd copies of books such as Elantris with no prohibition on distribution, yet the book is still under copyright and I have no 'receipt'.

Last edited by Demented; 01-27-2010 at 10:22 PM.
Demented is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2010, 11:31 PM   #116
Kirtai
Addict
Kirtai ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kirtai ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kirtai ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kirtai ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kirtai ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kirtai ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kirtai ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kirtai ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kirtai ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kirtai ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kirtai ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 304
Karma: 2454436
Join Date: Sep 2008
Device: PRS-505, PRS-650, iPad, Samsung Galaxy SII (JB), Google Nexus 7 (2013)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guns4Hire View Post
So quite a bit of revenue is being generated by this friend of mine the pirate. And I have to wonder without his recommendations if I would of ever stumbled onto these books.
This reminds me of Eric Flints writings on how the biggest threat to authors isn't piracy, it's obscurity.
Kirtai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 12:27 AM   #117
asjogren
Addict
asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.asjogren is no ebook tyro.
 
Posts: 266
Karma: 1378
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Seattle / San Carlos, Sonora, Mexico
Device: Kindle & WiFi Nook & PocketBook IQ
"If there were no geographic restrictions then ebook sellers in countries where it is expensive to do business would go out of business from competition by those in other countries where the cost of business is less."

That would be OK if we had
1) Protected the jobs of the textile industry
2) Protected the jobs of the manufacturing industry
3) Protected the jobs of the Call Center industry
4) Protected the jobs of the software industry

But, of course we did not. And I am certain I missed a number of jobs that big business off shored to save wages, taxes, and regulations.

Should the eBook industry be special? If business actively plays the global market, why can't customers?
asjogren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 12:43 AM   #118
Guns4Hire
Reading...Since 1970
Guns4Hire knows the square root of minus one.Guns4Hire knows the square root of minus one.Guns4Hire knows the square root of minus one.Guns4Hire knows the square root of minus one.Guns4Hire knows the square root of minus one.Guns4Hire knows the square root of minus one.Guns4Hire knows the square root of minus one.Guns4Hire knows the square root of minus one.Guns4Hire knows the square root of minus one.Guns4Hire knows the square root of minus one.Guns4Hire knows the square root of minus one.
 
Guns4Hire's Avatar
 
Posts: 610
Karma: 7819
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nova Air C, Nova Pro, LifebookMars, BoyueT62+ Glowlight, NST, PB360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirtai View Post
This reminds me of Eric Flints writings on how the biggest threat to authors isn't piracy, it's obscurity.
Yeah Eric Flint has a pretty unique look on it. He definitely has a forward thinking view. And why not. To just continue like its not going on or to rage against it isn't going to change anything (look at the RIAA they are worse off than than before). These publishers and authors have to compete with it (they do it now) so why not change the game.
Guns4Hire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 01:25 AM   #119
PKFFW
Wizard
PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PKFFW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,791
Karma: 33500000
Join Date: Dec 2008
Device: BeBook, Sony PRS-T1, Kobo H2O
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pardoz View Post
5-6 readers per physical book has been the accepted industry rule of thumb for years (long before ebooks came along). Not sure where the figure originated or if it's based on anything more than a WAG, though.
Just as a funny side note.....

Here in Australia the term "WAG" refers to "Wives And Girlfriends".

So when I read your post for the first time I thought you meant the figured originated from some wife or girlfriend of a publisher!

Cheers,
PKFFW
PKFFW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2010, 02:16 AM   #120
Hellmark
Wizard
Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Hellmark ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Hellmark's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,592
Karma: 4290425
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Foristell, Missouri, USA
Device: Nokia N800, PRS-505, Nook STR Glowlight, Kindle 3, Kobo Libra 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by calvin-c View Post
Hmm, so if I *can* steal your car it's OK to do so?
That is one argument against piracy I just can't get behind. If I steal your car, you are deprived of the use of it. If I copy your ebook, you still have it, still can sell it, still can do what ever you want with it, you just did not make any money off me.

The other question is, of each pirated copy of something, would that have been a sale otherwise?
Hellmark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Confessions of a Shopaholic under a Buck! koland Deals and Resources (No Self-Promotion or Affiliate Links) 5 08-06-2010 08:27 AM
Confessions of an After-Article Reader.... taglines News 2 02-02-2010 12:29 PM
Author Encourages Users to Pirate His Book kennyc Writers' Corner 8 10-18-2009 09:08 AM
Confessions of a Shopaholic digitalzen Lounge 0 12-03-2008 10:53 AM
Are you an e-book Pirate? Alexander Turcic News 15 05-14-2004 01:02 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 PM.


MobileRead.com is a privately owned, operated and funded community.