![]() |
#91 |
cacoethes scribendi
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
The article linked in the OP is nothing like I thought it was going to be, given the nature and volume of the posts here.
We can discard the title: "shockingly offensive", it's obviously only to grab your attention. The author of the article admits to having read some of these books previously, so they knew what was coming. There was nothing shocking about it. There is also tendency to go looking for offence: the author of the article seems to think Thomas Covenant was a character the reader was supposed to like, which misses the point of the character and the story. But there is at least some aspects of the article I can relate to, although I found the choice of references a bit puzzling: picking on fantasy worlds - more often than not in some semblance of medieval times - where the society and norms must be adhered to for the story work. Having re-read quite a lot of science fiction lately, it was disappointing to realise how little thought went into the social elements of some of the stories. A recent re-read, "Lucifer's Hammer", I found particularly obvious in this regard: within hours of the disaster the women are all looking for the strongest male to protect them. That's a 1977 book, it doesn't have the excuses we might give some of the older ones. Indeed some of the older ones handle it better, if only by omission. I think the biggest mistake the author of the article makes is to suggest that a look through the 100 best fantasy books is indicative of what was written. It's not. It's only indicative of what became popular; it doesn't tell us what was available. If there is offence to be had, it is to realise that the audience still prefers the books that author of the article finds offensive. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Quote:
But, yes, in SF&F and fantasy most list of historical "best" titles will lean towards the memorable (for a variety of reasons) and thus towards popularity rather than literary or political merit. As to LUCIFER'S HAMMER, if you look at the structure of the narrative, it really isn't a hard SF title or even Space Opera. It is more representative of bestseller thriller/soapers of the day than the SF of the times. Think of it as Niven & Pournelle trolling for social readers. ![]() Still a fun read but like many bestsellers it was dated within two years. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#93 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,204
Karma: 12029046
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Device: Kindle, Kobo Touch, Nook SimpleTouch
|
Quote:
![]() There is quite a bit of ropy old garbage in there, but I guess people were voting for the books they remember enjoying decades ago. The suck fairies have been at them since then. I think the original project is kind of forgivable if you take it as data rather than as a conclusion. If I'm measuring the heights of the students at a school, it doesn't really matter how good the education is. The two might turn out to be linked, but that's a separate step. I do wonder if fantasy is a bit of a write-off by definition. The Hero Rescues Princess archetype is pretty strongly bound into the genre. I blame Homer. The author of the Iliad, not Simpson. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 | |
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
|
Quote:
![]() I'm not so sure, actually. I suppose you could equally convert it to Heroine Rescues Prince. (For some reason I now have a mental image of Lancelot in that scene from Monty Python. ![]() Unless you are going strictly by the oldies. But excellent point, there is a lot of motive force there. Last edited by eschwartz; 09-04-2015 at 12:35 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 |
eBook Enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383099
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
There'll probably always be SF classics that some people love to hate for political reasons, such as Heinlein's "Starship Troopers" (which, even though I'm diametrically opposed to the political philosophy it espouses, I think personally is a great book!).
Last edited by HarryT; 09-04-2015 at 03:29 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#96 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,069
Karma: 12500000
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Okanagan
Device: Sony PRS-650, Kobo Clara
|
Yeah. When I see a cliche like "Political Correctness" or, now, "Social Justice Warriors," I usually discount everything else they say. If they're that lazy, it's probably not worth the effort of paying attention.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 | |
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
|
Quote:
It is a term used to describe a concept. The purpose of language is to communicate. I fail to see why you object to that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 |
eBook Enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383099
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
I think the point being made was that if you attach a "label" to the viewpoint of somebody with whom you disagree, it can lead to simply dismissing their argument without actually stopping to consider whether or not it has any validity.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,058
Karma: 54671821
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New England
Device: PW 1, 2, 3, Voyage, Oasis 2 & 3, Fires, Aura HD, iPad
|
Quote:
What if I were to tell you that a lot of the books I read come from Baen, and Orson Scott Card and Heinlein are two of my favorite authors? Would I still be considered a SJW? Shari |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 | |
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
|
Quote:
Someone can use a label, e.g. "SJW", "PC", "liberal", "conservative"... ...and go on to define that, say something about it, etc. etc. The only person who seems to be advocating slapping a label on people by cherry-picking what they say and then resolving to simply ignore everything they say... is arjaybe. Which, given the justification, would be extremely ironic if it weren't so typical of the general mindset (getting offended over labels). People who want to make blanket generalizations will manage to do so, regardless of labels. You can generalize using labels, or you can generalize about labels, bu it is still generalizing. ![]() Last edited by eschwartz; 09-04-2015 at 02:28 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#101 | |
Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 631
Karma: 7544528
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berlin
Device: PRS 350, Kobo Aura
|
Quote:
And lazy: Instead of discussing different and surly controversial ideas, it is very easy to just dismiss it under a term. Please ask yourself, would you in a face to face discussion, use such a term? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#102 | |
Just a Yellow Smiley.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,161
Karma: 83862859
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Texas
Device: K4, K5, fire, kobo, galaxy
|
Quote:
A label is just a way to define whatever/whoever you are talking about. So yes, it is nothing more than someone's opinion of themselves or others. Sometimes it is nothing more than a stereotype. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#103 | |||
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
|
Quote:
I guarantee, given sufficient motivation, you could find judgmentalism, from someone's perspective, about most words. Words describe ideas. Ideas are used to label things and people. Usually we try to avoid falsely labeling people, but attempting to go wholly without labels is... idiotic. Two labels I can slap on you right here and now: you're "German" and you "read books". Pretty much anything is bound to be offensive to someone out there -- it's a big world. ![]() I *could* react in a highly illogical, devoid-of-facts manner to those labels, and associate your location with Nazis and progress from there to calling you an Anti-Semite (I am a religious Jew, BTW)... but that would be downright retarded, not least because I have no logical backing. It is nevertheless true that both Nazis and Anti-Semites exist... however much of a label those words may be... Quote:
Quote:
Instead, you have engaged in the slippery slope fallacy, by suggesting that anyone who utilizes a term you don't like to hear will automatically fail to provide any sort of reasoning. Last edited by eschwartz; 09-04-2015 at 03:02 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#104 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,204
Karma: 12029046
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Device: Kindle, Kobo Touch, Nook SimpleTouch
|
I enjoyed Starship Troopers. It was Stranger in a Strange Land that I really choked on when I was reading all the Hugo winners. I'd put it in my bottom three.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#105 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,069
Karma: 12500000
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Okanagan
Device: Sony PRS-650, Kobo Clara
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Action & Adventure ~ DUST BOWL JUSTICE ~ Texas, 1934 | DreamWriter | Self-Promotions by Authors and Publishers | 34 | 04-11-2017 10:57 AM |
Final Justice (sequel to Impeding Justice) | Mel Comley | Self-Promotions by Authors and Publishers | 4 | 09-09-2013 10:28 AM |
Cruel Justice the prequel to Impeding Justice | Mel Comley | Self-Promotions by Authors and Publishers | 17 | 07-26-2013 10:53 AM |
U.S. Justice Dept. moves to block AT&T, T-Mobile merger | afa | News | 3 | 09-01-2011 10:34 AM |
Free novel (B&N / Kindle / Sony) - The Justice Game | Susan Crealock | Deals and Resources (No Self-Promotion or Affiliate Links) | 5 | 12-28-2010 01:58 PM |