09-19-2018, 01:04 AM | #61 | |
E-reader Enthusiast
Posts: 4,871
Karma: 36507503
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southwest, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis 3; Kobo Aura One; iPad Mini 5
|
Quote:
This book was published in the middle of the other books that I have read, which makes it interesting to compare the progression of memory as a subject matter. His earlier works were elderly narrators looking back on their lives with a self-deception and regret about what led them to where they are (unreliable narrators). I think this book is interesting because it opens with a young women (30-ish) reflecting on school and early adult memories. When you start reading the book, you know that she is transitioning from being a carer, but you don't know all the details. As you discover the details that have been concealed, you realize that although she is young she is reflecting on her memories as she is facing the transition from carer to donor and completion (death). Rather than being remorseful like Ishiguro's other novels, Kathy's memories as she is facing mortality (and the end of her life span) are more comforting. She is reliving her memories of the people closest to her who have left this world before her. Looking at her hanging on to these memories from this perspective gives another meaning to the title "Never Let Me Go." While the clones are outsiders to the rest of their normal world, they do have feelings of friendship and love for each other, even if they have also hurt each other in the past. That's the nature of relationships that there will be positive and negative feelings at times. In his most recent book, The Buried Giant Ishiguro again focused on an elderly couple. However in this book, he addressed the collective memories of an entire nation and how they may bury the past. As a result, this book switched from first-person to third-person narration. |
|
09-19-2018, 01:43 AM | #62 |
cacoethes scribendi
Posts: 5,809
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
With mortality being one of the themes of this work, I was doing a bit of hunting around for information about life expectancy and came across the Glasgow effect.
First there is the obvious thing (quoted from here): "In Glasgow, the disparity is amongst the highest in the world: life expectancy for males in the heavily deprived Calton area stands at 54, which is 28 years less than in the affluent area of Lenzie, which is only 8 km away." Notice that the difference is about the expected life span of one of our clones. There is also (from the first link): "The city's mortality gap was not apparent until 1950 and seems to have widened since the 1970s", which struck me as conveniently in synchronisation with the alternative history of our story. Catlady asked why our protagonists didn't just drive way, we might well ask some Glaswegians the same question. Escape seems obvious to outsiders, it's not so obvious when it's the world you live in. What I'm getting at here is that Ishiguro constructed a situation in which the protagonists mortality and passivity have been exaggerated so that it seems overtly unfair - and even unreasonable - to the reader, but for all that I keep finding examples that make his story seem less of exaggeration than we might assume. Last edited by gmw; 09-19-2018 at 01:46 AM. |
Advert | |
|
09-19-2018, 06:56 AM | #63 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,265
Karma: 10203040
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: a variety (mostly kindles and kobos)
|
Quote:
As I said, I didn't re-read it so I can't remember if this is made explicit in this book - probably not given how vague most of the tech stuff is. I certainly inferred that at the time, but that may have been because I'd read things like Michael Marshall Smith's Spares or seen the movie The Island both of which cover similar ground and are much more explicit on the process. |
|
09-19-2018, 07:04 AM | #64 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,265
Karma: 10203040
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: a variety (mostly kindles and kobos)
|
Quote:
Going back to that interview and how clear Ishiguro is that he wanted to use this as a device to talk about mortality, it becomes obviously necessary that they are passive in the face of their fate, because for the most part we are too*. But that should come out in the text itself and I'm mystified as to why he didn't make the very small effort it would have taken to make this stuff clear. *the opposite of passivity in this case I think would not just be "raging against the dying of the light" but actively pursuing longevity - which very few people do and those that do are seen as a bit eccentric. |
|
09-19-2018, 07:44 AM | #65 | |
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,375
Karma: 223034386
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
Quote:
But you're saying that has recalled to me that the clones seem to understand on some level that they've been cloned from human "trash," so to speak, in the morality of the universe. Whores, thieves, and so forth. Yet another passing suggestion of underlying issues, since it shows that cloning, while accepted, is still found to be somewhat morally dubious. "Good people" don't have clones and the dross of humanity can be assumed to have either compromised souls or have lost them, I suppose. Since the clones seem to have a good interior understanding of their situation even when not openly acknowledged, I have no reason to suspect that they've got this wrong. Ruth's "possible" was seen as wishful thinking, but that's the point of "wishful." |
|
Advert | |
|
09-19-2018, 08:04 AM | #66 |
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,375
Karma: 223034386
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
I haven't watched the Ishiguro video yet and I may not. I don't care what an author thinks of his work or what he was trying to convey. If he has to spell it out, then it was a failure (for me, obviously, and maybe I was just obtuse). I'm a staunch adherent of the school that says that a work has to stand on its own merits.
That said, if I liked and/or valued a work, I'm generally interested in an author's take on it and perhaps it will deepen my understanding of it. But the author's comments won't change a book I didn't like into one I do. |
09-19-2018, 08:10 AM | #67 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
|
This discussion about lack of credibility in the donation process is illustrative of one of the books biggest weaknesses, or from a different perspective one of its biggest strengths. The book is not about the cloning process or the science. The world in which it is set is probably one of the most sketchy dystopian worlds I have ever come across. But I don't believe that the author was lazy. It was quite deliberate. The author clearly wanted to write about particular things, and that's what he did. Personally I don't think it worked very well, but opinions differ.
The author left us to fill in the details ourselves almost completely. How we did so is a big factor in whether we found the book at all realistic. I think if we look to the actual state of medical science the organ donation is a nonsense. In the real world organs are essentially used for one thing. Transplant directly from a donor to a recipient. Organ transplants do not cure cancer or other diseases unconnected with the organs function. Nor can organs be used to create miracle cures. This effectively blows criticisms of the credibility of the donation process out of the water. Our science does not apply. In the book organs are harvested for research. They are harvested for miracle cures, perhaps for use in drug production. We just don't know. We do know that they are needed to cure otherwise incurable diseases in some unexplained manner. We simply don't know whether there is some medical reason for the donation process. It is not hard to imagine such reasons. The author just wanted to tell a particular story. |
09-19-2018, 08:14 AM | #68 | |
Wizard
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
|
Quote:
|
|
09-19-2018, 08:17 AM | #69 |
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,375
Karma: 223034386
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
I didn't need to find the book realistic, necessarily, but I thought the background to this was too nebulous. It's a delicate balance; I'm also not fond of books where the author spells out everything, seemingly not confident of the reader's ability to flesh things out. The author needs to have a thorough understanding of his world and then convey enough to suggest a coherent and consistent universe and no more. Implication and indirect are what I look for.
In fact, Ishiguro blew it both ways, AFAIC. Too slight a framework for the issues he wanted to suggest, and then that horrible info dump at the end. |
09-19-2018, 09:13 AM | #70 | |||
Wizard
Posts: 1,265
Karma: 10203040
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: a variety (mostly kindles and kobos)
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Never Let Me Go definitely works for me as whole, but that side of it detracts a little. |
|||
09-19-2018, 09:21 AM | #71 |
cacoethes scribendi
Posts: 5,809
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
I did feel that the explanations provided by Miss Emily were the worst part of the book (but not bad enough to spoil it for me). There was not enough information in there to satisfy those seeking the sorts of detail we see in this thread, and there was more than was really needed by those content to accept the world as presented. I had been fascinated by the way Ishiguro had revealed the world prior to this, simply but so effectively that by the time we were seated in front of Miss Emily I was trying to work out what we were doing there; what could she possibly say - that actually mattered - that we didn't already know? I say "we" because as far as I can tell the protagonists felt the same way: all Miss Emily did was confirm what we'd already surmised. I think this may have been why the explanations exist, not to tell us anything new, but to highlight the futility of the explanations.
And remember that our protagonists are only looking for a delay. They are not expecting or asking for a total reprieve from their fate. That they got nothing came as no surprise to anyone. It didn't seem sad as such, not when it was only what had been expected, but I could appreciate the inarticulate rage expressed by Tommy after this meeting. Tommy's rages reminded me of the screaming on Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon album. For so much of the book they're sort of distant, background noises, something we're told about rather than witnessing, and it's only after the meeting with Miss Emily that it comes into full voice - but still inarticulate; there seems nowhere he can direct this rage, and never has been. |
09-19-2018, 09:28 AM | #72 | |
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,375
Karma: 223034386
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
Quote:
Then one can wonder what made people become possibles? Coercion? Part of the punishment inflicted by society for their crimes? Payment? All of the above? |
|
09-19-2018, 09:50 AM | #73 | |||
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,346
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
There's no suggestion that ANY clone has ever tried to leave and been dragged back and punished for it, providing some deterrent for the others. We do know that couples keep trying to get the imaginary deferrals, and the belief in those deferrals continues, which indicates a desire to escape their fate. Yet none of those disappointed couples ever try to run away? Quote:
I was especially annoyed with the information dump--the whole find-and-talk-to-Madame scenario raised my expectations of a significant reveal in the offing. But it was a whole lot of nothing. Quote:
Rather than passivity, I would have liked to see in the clones an exaggerated sense of altruism. Suppose they'd been taught to be self-sacrificing and noble, to feel they were performing a great service to humanity--which they are. I think that would have been a lot more interesting, but there's nothing to support it in the novel. |
|||
09-19-2018, 10:03 AM | #74 | ||
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,375
Karma: 223034386
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
09-19-2018, 10:18 AM | #75 | ||
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,346
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
It seems more realistic for rich people to have clones--so that if they need a new organ, they've got a perfect match in reserve. They pay for the cloning and the housing of the clone till needed. Quote:
|
||
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kazuo Ishiguro Awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature | astrangerhere | News | 25 | 10-17-2017 10:53 PM |
MobileRead September 2015 Discussion: Candide (spoilers) | WT Sharpe | Book Clubs | 16 | 09-27-2015 12:38 PM |
Literary The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro | sun surfer | Book Clubs | 30 | 02-13-2015 12:36 AM |
MobileRead September 2014 Discussion: The Grapes of Wrath (spoilers) | WT Sharpe | Book Clubs | 18 | 10-26-2014 02:37 PM |
Literary The MobileRead Literary Book Club September 2011 Discussion: Unbroken | sun surfer | Book Clubs | 12 | 10-14-2011 04:24 PM |