03-16-2018, 12:48 PM | #46 | ||
(he/him/his)
Posts: 12,208
Karma: 79742714
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sunshine Coast, BC
Device: Oasis (Gen3),Paperwhite (Gen10), Voyage, Paperwhite(orig), Fire HD 8
|
Quote:
I actually think Santiago's directly killing the fish he will eat (or sell to buy his food) is far better than people who go into a local discount grocery and buy battery chickens that have been raised in inhumane conditions (I can post myriad links if you want) in order to meet the demand for cheap food. They aren't taking responsibility for their killing, or the conditions required to produce it at that price. (But let's NOT turn this into a P&R discussion, please!) Quote:
Thank you for taking on the challenge of reading this and contributing. I think any really powerful book will be difficult for some to read, and good selections for this club will often push some of us out of our comfort zone. That's both the good and the hard about a good book club. |
||
03-16-2018, 04:48 PM | #47 |
Snoozing in the sun
Posts: 10,137
Karma: 115423645
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Device: iPad Mini, Kobo Touch
|
Yes, I agree and I acknowledged the difference between a fisherman who is trying to earn his living and one who considers it a sport. But what I dislike is that whole idea of its being heroic to battle and subdue the natural world.
|
Advert | |
|
03-16-2018, 05:12 PM | #48 |
(he/him/his)
Posts: 12,208
Karma: 79742714
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sunshine Coast, BC
Device: Oasis (Gen3),Paperwhite (Gen10), Voyage, Paperwhite(orig), Fire HD 8
|
Yup. You did. And I get that dislike. Though I'm not sure I'd say Santiago is trying to subdue the natural world so much as trying to survive it. Hemingway, however, is rather far over on the heroic battle side of the spectrum. WAY over.
|
03-16-2018, 07:19 PM | #49 |
Snoozing in the sun
Posts: 10,137
Karma: 115423645
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Device: iPad Mini, Kobo Touch
|
That’s what I meant and probably didn’t express clearly enough. It’s not Santiago himself but the whole underlying premise, which is Hemingway’s.
|
03-16-2018, 07:55 PM | #50 | |
cacoethes scribendi
Posts: 5,812
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
Quote:
To pursue this huge fish he cuts away the other baits. So he does "give up" in the sense that he gives up any chance of catching a fish he he could have landed properly. |
|
Advert | |
|
03-16-2018, 10:34 PM | #51 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,356
Karma: 52612287
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
I hated it. Everything about it.
I will admit I went into this with a bad attitude and extreme reluctance. I am a vegetarian; I don't want to read anything that involves killing animals, either for food or for sport. And I don't like Hemingway, from what little I was forced to read of his in school. I don't know anything about fishing and didn't like all the details that were meaningless to me, nor did I want to try to learn about an activity I find distasteful. I don't much like the old man; I don't like his talking to the fish and his hand. I don't like his lack of foresight in uselessly killing something that he knew/should have known would become shark food; that makes the killing not for food, but for sport--for the challenge of it--and that makes it additionally cruel. I could tolerate the baseball references--though I haven't a clue why they were there, and by the time the book was published in 1952, Joe DiMaggio had retired. The best thing about the book was that it was short, but as short as it was, I resented the time spent reading it. |
03-16-2018, 11:38 PM | #52 | |
E-reader Enthusiast
Posts: 4,873
Karma: 36507503
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southwest, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis 3; Kobo Aura One; iPad Mini 5
|
I thought the book was too long and should have been shorter. I liked the writing. I enjoyed the Hemingway short stories that we read in the Literary Club. I just wasn't into the subject matter of this book. I would have preferred more development of the relationship with the boy. Perhaps the short synopsis in the introduction ruined it for me.
I read the book twice. The first time was excruciatingly boring. I abandoned it at 35%. I just couldn't take anymore of it. Then I skimmed the rest of it until the ending. I liked the beginning and the ending which had interaction between Santiago and the boy and the community. I gave it 1 star on Goodreads. I just plain hated it. Then I read 1 star and 5 star reviews to understand why people love or hate this book. I know nothing about sea fishing, but I do love baseball. So, I decided to research the meaning of all the baseball references to have context. Then I found information and pictures to understand the fishing information. Like others the dolphins perplexed me (that's probably about the point where I gave up!) so then I figured out they were really fish. Then I went to sleep! Only because it was a book club read did I attempt it a second time the following day with a fresh perspective. Now that I had the extra research and context, I was able to focus more on the main themes of the book and not get distracted by the other items. I upgraded my rating to 3 stars. Anyway, I've checked the box that I read it. I wouldn't read it again. However, I would read other Hemingway novels. My husband read Islands in the Stream and loved it so he wanted to read more Hemingway. Then he read The Sun Also Rises and hated it - too much love story. From Wikipedia: Quote:
Last edited by Bookworm_Girl; 03-16-2018 at 11:40 PM. |
|
03-17-2018, 08:03 AM | #53 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,375
Karma: 26915798
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ireland
Device: Kindle Oasis 3, 4G, iPad Air 2, iPhone IE
|
I first read this book some decades ago and as it was done in class, I could not really appreciate it properly. This time I was astonished at what a masterpiece it is. The "simple" fisherman is anything but simple. He has a philosophy which informs his entire being and which impels him to great heroism in an unequal struggle with the elements and still simultaneously prompts him to question the validity of that struggle.
The battle with the great fish is genuinely tragic. He knows that one of them must die and yet he loves his opponent. The Old Man hunts not out of hate but to survive. Still, in the end, he wonders whether he was right to seek out the Fish; that he travelled too far out for either. The Fish gives up its life but only the sharks benefit from the sacrifice. The Old Man wrestles with this conundrum but in the end he finds no certain answer. The pacing of the novel is perfect. There are those great meditative passages alternating with moments of the fury of the hunt and the anguish of the battle with the sharks. And finally the return home where the we see a kind of rebirth. The Boy knows that he has much to learn from the Old Man. Thus the latter's struggle bears a kind of fruit for the future. Still, the novel leaves us wondering about basic questions— the true function of a masterpiece. Last edited by fantasyfan; 03-17-2018 at 03:14 PM. |
03-17-2018, 08:21 AM | #54 |
cacoethes scribendi
Posts: 5,812
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
Makes you wonder if we all read the same book.
|
03-17-2018, 10:54 AM | #55 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,356
Karma: 52612287
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
The old man may be tragic, but I don't think he's heroic. He kills a magnificent creature for no reason--he knows he can't possibly get it home. All his supposed love for his "brother" is a lot of hokum. I can accept intellectually that this impoverished man might need to fish to survive, but let him just go do it, without the pretense of loving the fish he's trying to kill, not to mention the collateral damage--the raw fish he eats and the sharks he kills.
The magnificent fish being caught only to be destroyed in the process of getting it home reminded me of something but I couldn't put my finger on it until today--it's the unicorn hunting scene in The Once and Future King. Morgause's sons catch and kill the gentle unicorn and try to drag it home to her, but ruin its beauty and finally only the head is left; instead of being pleased with their gift, Morgause whips them. |
03-17-2018, 01:46 PM | #56 |
Home Guard
Posts: 4,730
Karma: 86721650
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alpha Ralpha Boulevard
Device: Kindle Oasis 3G, iPhone 6
|
|
03-17-2018, 02:03 PM | #57 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,356
Karma: 52612287
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
One could make a case for the killing of the sharks to be reasonable once the marlin was killed. Killing them is secondary. Frankly, although I had enough awareness of the story to know it didn't happen, I would've been just fine with the sharks overturning the boat and ... karma. (I'm not really bloodthirsty. But I don't like the glorification of killing animals.) |
|
03-17-2018, 02:49 PM | #58 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,375
Karma: 26915798
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ireland
Device: Kindle Oasis 3, 4G, iPad Air 2, iPhone IE
|
Quote:
I suppose that Hemingway’s novel will always divide opinion and I can certainly understand why that is so. I felt very uneasy about the relationship between the Great Fish and the Old Man. I finally decided that his awareness of the dignity and beauty of the Fish was real—as was his love for it. He states that God had made him a Fisherman and The Fish was—in the end—a fish. He felt the same way about that first terrible shark. Its terrifing deadly nature was part of its nobility. He still killed it though it could have killed him. It was—in his mind—the nature of their elemental relationship. Last edited by fantasyfan; 03-17-2018 at 03:19 PM. |
|
03-17-2018, 03:18 PM | #59 |
Resident Curmudgeon
Posts: 75,917
Karma: 134368292
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
The book could have been titled The Old Man and the Boy and we'd have a story of the old man and the boy. That would have been a better story.
|
03-17-2018, 04:14 PM | #60 |
Almost legible
Posts: 1,457
Karma: 4611110
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: In a high desert, CA
Device: Galaxy Note 9, Galaxy Tab A (2017), Likebook P78
|
Considering the that fishing is a lottery of sorts--you don't know what's at the other end of the line until much later--I can't fault the old man for trying to catch the fish initially. A fish one third smaller would have given a similar fight and still been small enough to get into the boat.
As for the rightness or wrongness of the acts of fishing... that reaches over into an entirely different topic. |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Other Fiction Hemingway, Ernest: The Old Man and the Sea. V1. 7 March 2013 | Pulpmeister | Kindle Books (offline) | 1 | 07-17-2013 04:07 PM |
Other Fiction Hemingway, Ernest: The Sun Also Rises. V1. 7 March 2013 | Pulpmeister | Kindle Books (offline) | 1 | 03-09-2013 08:21 PM |
Literary My Old Man by Ernest Hemingway | sun surfer | Book Clubs | 10 | 07-13-2012 07:57 PM |