Unutterably Silly Forum Game: Last person to post here wins!

[library addict]

A win before finally making breakfast.

[PieMan597]

I win.

[5thWiggleWife]

Forgotten file at the office win.

[HomeInMyShoes]

Mmm...coffee...

[red_phoenix]

Originally Posted by HomeInMyShoes

Mmm...coffee...

[PieMan597]

I win.

[library addict]

Now I win.

[HomeInMyShoes]

I win.

[PieMan597]

I win.

[HomeInMyShoes]

I win.

[Solitaire1]

Originally Posted by doubleshuffle

Well, our posts are of similar length. Yours however, seems to exhibit some philosophical tendencies, while mine is more of the anecdotal persuasion, to which I stick because philosophers never met with a happy end in our family. There was, for instance, the above-mentioned Uncle Bartholomaeus, who once argued with Jacques Derrida about the manifestation of the différance in prayers said before family dinners. Uncle Bartholomaeus was not as concise as he certainly would have been had he only been aware that Monsieur Derrida hadn't eaten since breakfast (it now being ten of the clock in the evening) and could not really deal very well with the fact that he did not manage to succeed in his attempts to get a word in and suggest having dinner to my uncle. So desperate did the hapless philosopher become in his hunger that he began to get a manic glint in his eye and proceeded to deconstruct my poor Uncle Bartholomaeus with knife and fork - so thoroughly that there was nothing left to bury of my poor philosophical uncle. Here's to you again, Uncle Bartholomaeus!

I've never thought of my posts as philosophical but rather an observation of reality itself, and an attempt to ponder the structure of the universe, both at the macro level and the micro level to determine the ultimate nature of the win. Is the win a part of reality or just the perception of a small portion of reality and only known by those who actually observe it, which is also an issue with Schrödinger's cat, although whether that actually has an issue with the nature of reality (where things are and are not at the same time). If that is the case then it is possible for everyone to be a winner at the same time since, in the multiverse theory of existence every possibly exists at the same time and yet every possibility does not exist at the same time. This also includes the possibility that the word for "win" in other universes is written as "nevergonnagiveyouup" or "discoduck" or "sheblindedmewithscience." However, it is unlikely that that is the case since people would tend to shorten it a bit over time...if it is people who are taking the win in other universes. That leads to the possibility of non-human winners such as, as mentioned in The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy, hyperintelligent shades of blue, or possibly impossible concepts such as i (the square root of -1, which is called an imaginary number), or even a sentient win becoming the ultimate winner. Still, right now I have the win.

[5thWiggleWife]

Yah, wot he said!

[PieMan597]

I win.

[library addict]

Quick win.

[PieMan597]

I win.