Adobe has new hope for e-books with Adobe Digital Editions - Page 3

davidrothman · 10-25-2006, 12:54 AM

Alex did a great job of summing up the new program's features. For another perspective, see http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=5698 .

Beyond the usual DRM gotchas, there's the issue of the reader's being "Flash-based"---Adobe's own words. You can bet that Adobe will be more interested in promoting books with proprietary gotchas than the unencumbered pure OEBPS variety. In effect we're still deep in, yep, eBabel territory. Simply put, the new Adobe program is a Trojan for proprietary technology.

Meanwhile, the guys at Microsoft may very well have a superior raeder in the works. The Times Reader displayed better on my PC than the Adobe program did, and I suspect that the inevitable successor to Microsoft Reader will do the same. Significantly, Microsoft has not been a participant in the IDPF's latest standards-setting activities---dominated by Adobe and ETI.

Thanks.
David

David Rothman | TeleRead.org | 703-370-6540

TadW · 10-25-2006, 03:13 AM

David,

So you prefer Microsoft over Adobe because the former's application "displays better" on your PC than the latter's, disregarding the fact that the former uses a proprietary book format? I don't understand you. All the time you've been screaming for a common e-book standard based on open-specs; now we have a big company who does the attempt, and you disqualify them based on the quality of an initial early beta release?

The Times Reader uses Microsoft .NET. Do you have any idea how many people do not have .NET installed? Either because they don't like the additional bloat, or simply because they are not using the Windows system. So how is Times Reader any less "eBabel territory" - using your famed words - than Digital Editions?

It doesn't matter what Digital Editions is written in. The point is that it supports an e-book format that is aimed at becoming the standard, which implies that other software application would support the same format in some future, making it easy for the user to switch to another reader if Digital Editions doesn't fit him well.

ath · 10-25-2006, 03:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yvanleterrible

Pity it only reads PDF.

Look deeper. It also read XHTML files -- indeed, some of the free eBooks from Adobe are XHTML.

ath · 10-25-2006, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TadW

The point is that it supports an e-book format that is aimed at becoming the standard, which implies that other software application would support the same format in some future, making it easy for the user to switch to another reader if Digital Editions doesn't fit him well.

Also, if Adobe keeps it up, it doesn't seem unlikely that their other tools will also support this format: InDesign, say. Noone would get InDesign to produce OEBPS books (or whatever the format is), but if I can take the files for a printed book, done with InDesign, and produce a e-book from them in a well-supported format, conversion will be much less of a hassle than if I have to re-scan the pages. I won't hope that Acrobat will allow saving into this format ... at least not for a while.

STML · 10-25-2006, 08:28 AM

Come on - I've had a play with this thing and it's just Acrobat on Flash. It doesn't solve any of the problems of reading PDFs - no proper scrolling, random whitespace, fixed alignments - and in some cases makes them worse. Whatever Adobe say about the future of the application, it's intended as a reader for their own proprietary, DRM-riddled books, which no one is going to want.

yvanleterrible · 10-25-2006, 08:34 AM

Adobe should break with their software only tradition and build a reader, eink that is!

Alexander Turcic · 10-25-2006, 03:30 PM

David of Teleread wrote an in-depth article where he argues that Adobe Digital Editions suffers from various OEBPS conformance problems. Worth checking out!

pdam · 10-25-2006, 03:31 PM

Adopting an open standard, such as OEBPS is a great step forward, persummably the same file can now be displayed through different softweare readers - it'll be much more palitable for publishers to use one format and support multiple DRM schemes for different readers ... now if we could have an open standard around DRM that could cover most eventualities and be acceptable for publishers ...the ebook/emagazine format might take off!

This is potentially a good step forward ...

yvanleterrible · 10-25-2006, 04:23 PM

I found something out by pure hazard. The reader seems to open at the last page read when you shut it, that is nice.

bowerbird · 10-25-2006, 05:02 PM

alexander said:
> there are currently only two specs being considered
> as possible future open e-book standards.

not so fast there, pilgrim. :+)

there are people out here with other ideas,
i can assure you of that...

-bowerbird

Alexander Turcic · 10-25-2006, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowerbird

alexander said:
> there are currently only two specs being considered
> as possible future open e-book standards.

not so fast there, pilgrim. :+)

there are people out here with other ideas,
i can assure you of that...

-bowerbird

Heh

Can you shed some light?

Unfortunately, I believe, it takes more than just ideas to establish a standard. At least if you have to deal with publishers in your back.

bowerbird · 10-25-2006, 06:39 PM

i will be happy to shed some light;
not right now, but sometime soon.

i don't believe the future of books
will be determined by "publishers",
any more than the future of music
will be determined by the r.i.a.a.

their time has passed. they did a
good job, and deserve our thanks.
(and the money they milked from us.)
but their time is now officially over.
they are no longer in charge of us...

heck, even their _back-catalogs_
will come to be of very little value
if they insist on locking them up,
because the world of tomorrow will
have an abundance of content that
most authors will give away freely,
after having learned that the readers
will happily reciprocate financially...

that p-book you just paid $20 for?
the author got a buck. will you really
withhold your dollar from that author?
i gave a bigger tip than that at _lunch_,
to a waitress because she smiled at me.

this myth that writers will not write unless
we pay them is propagated by accountants.
i'm a writer and i know lots of other writers.
and we write because we _have_to_ write...

maybe the _accountants_ will stop working
if we don't pay them. (couldn't blame 'em.
and you know, that's really not a bad idea.)

but us writers will keep right on writing...
and we trust that our fans will reward us.

not only that, we actively look forward
to exercising a gift-based relationship
with fans, not the extortion-based one
of "pay me first if you want this book".

tomorrow's authors will take books
_directly_ to their readership. ergo,
what they need is a format that will
get out of their way when they write,
but give the high-powered functionality
readers will soon expect from e-books.

it's humorous to watch all this flurry
around formats and d.r.m. and such.
talk about barking up the wrong tree!
we're gonna be transforming society!
that's what the discussion needs to be!

-bowerbird

Bob Russell · 10-25-2006, 07:35 PM

Wow! Very intriguing. With respect to the author's viewpoints especially. I wonder how many feel that way, though. I hope many. Transforming society through new ways of making, selling, reading books is an awesome mission.

TadW · 10-25-2006, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowerbird

i will be happy to shed some light;
not right now, but sometime soon.

... possibly the "zen markup language" you were referring to earlier?

https://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6644

davidrothman · 10-25-2006, 08:05 PM

Hi, TadW. I'm making comparisons among existing products. You bet I'm still keen on a common format. Meanwhile folks can check out Jon Noring's take on Adobe DE at http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=5702 .

Thanks,
David

10-25-2006, 03:13 AM	#32
TadW Uebermensch Posts: 2,583 Karma: 1094606 Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Italy Device: Kindle	David, So you prefer Microsoft over Adobe because the former's application "displays better" on your PC than the latter's, disregarding the fact that the former uses a proprietary book format? I don't understand you. All the time you've been screaming for a common e-book standard based on open-specs; now we have a big company who does the attempt, and you disqualify them based on the quality of an initial early beta release? The Times Reader uses Microsoft .NET. Do you have any idea how many people do not have .NET installed? Either because they don't like the additional bloat, or simply because they are not using the Windows system. So how is Times Reader any less "eBabel territory" - using your famed words - than Digital Editions? It doesn't matter what Digital Editions is written in. The point is that it supports an e-book format that is aimed at becoming the standard, which implies that other software application would support the same format in some future, making it easy for the user to switch to another reader if Digital Editions doesn't fit him well. Last edited by TadW; 10-25-2006 at 03:24 AM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Downloading Adobe Ebook pdf files crashes Adobe Digital Editions ....	Zevs	Sony Reader	2	09-17-2010 12:25 PM
help adobe digital editions	jolfc	Sony Reader	1	03-16-2010 01:24 AM
Classic Video: How to transfe books using Adobe Digital Editions	mos	Barnes & Noble NOOK	0	02-13-2010 05:37 AM
Transferring Adobe Digital Editions Books to my EZREADER	ezziriah	Astak EZReader	9	02-01-2010 05:50 PM
Question about Adobe Digital Editions library books	jfinli	ePub	1	05-25-2009 08:34 AM

10-25-2006, 12:54 AM	#31
davidrothman Connoisseur Posts: 60 Karma: 32 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Alexandria, VA Device: Paperwhite, $50 Fire, iPad Air 2, Nexus 6, Kobo Aura H2O	Alex did a great job of summing up the new program's features. For another perspective, see http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=5698 . Beyond the usual DRM gotchas, there's the issue of the reader's being "Flash-based"---Adobe's own words. You can bet that Adobe will be more interested in promoting books with proprietary gotchas than the unencumbered pure OEBPS variety. In effect we're still deep in, yep, eBabel territory. Simply put, the new Adobe program is a Trojan for proprietary technology. Meanwhile, the guys at Microsoft may very well have a superior raeder in the works. The Times Reader displayed better on my PC than the Adobe program did, and I suspect that the inevitable successor to Microsoft Reader will do the same. Significantly, Microsoft has not been a participant in the IDPF's latest standards-setting activities---dominated by Adobe and ETI. Thanks. David David Rothman \| TeleRead.org \| 703-370-6540

10-25-2006, 08:28 AM	#35
STML Speculator Posts: 13 Karma: 10 Join Date: Oct 2006	Come on - I've had a play with this thing and it's just Acrobat on Flash. It doesn't solve any of the problems of reading PDFs - no proper scrolling, random whitespace, fixed alignments - and in some cases makes them worse. Whatever Adobe say about the future of the application, it's intended as a reader for their own proprietary, DRM-riddled books, which no one is going to want.

10-25-2006, 08:34 AM	#36
yvanleterrible Reborn Paper User Posts: 8,616 Karma: 15446734 Join Date: May 2006 Location: Que Nada Device: iPhone8, iPad Air	Adobe should break with their software only tradition and build a reader, eink that is!

10-25-2006, 03:30 PM	#37
Alexander Turcic Fully Converged Posts: 18,171 Karma: 14021202 Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Switzerland Device: Too many to count here.	David of Teleread wrote an in-depth article where he argues that Adobe Digital Editions suffers from various OEBPS conformance problems. Worth checking out!

10-25-2006, 03:31 PM	#38
pdam Groupie Posts: 199 Karma: 100 Join Date: Aug 2006 Device: iLiad, iPaq, Psion5&7, Blackberry	Adopting an open standard, such as OEBPS is a great step forward, persummably the same file can now be displayed through different softweare readers - it'll be much more palitable for publishers to use one format and support multiple DRM schemes for different readers ... now if we could have an open standard around DRM that could cover most eventualities and be acceptable for publishers ...the ebook/emagazine format might take off! This is potentially a good step forward ...

10-25-2006, 04:23 PM	#39
yvanleterrible Reborn Paper User Posts: 8,616 Karma: 15446734 Join Date: May 2006 Location: Que Nada Device: iPhone8, iPad Air	I found something out by pure hazard. The reader seems to open at the last page read when you shut it, that is nice.

10-25-2006, 05:02 PM	#40
bowerbird Banned Posts: 269 Karma: -273 Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: los angeles	alexander said: > there are currently only two specs being considered > as possible future open e-book standards. not so fast there, pilgrim. :+) there are people out here with other ideas, i can assure you of that... -bowerbird

10-25-2006, 06:39 PM	#42
bowerbird Banned Posts: 269 Karma: -273 Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: los angeles	i will be happy to shed some light; not right now, but sometime soon. i don't believe the future of books will be determined by "publishers", any more than the future of music will be determined by the r.i.a.a. their time has passed. they did a good job, and deserve our thanks. (and the money they milked from us.) but their time is now officially over. they are no longer in charge of us... heck, even their _back-catalogs_ will come to be of very little value if they insist on locking them up, because the world of tomorrow will have an abundance of content that most authors will give away freely, after having learned that the readers will happily reciprocate financially... that p-book you just paid $20 for? the author got a buck. will you really withhold your dollar from that author? i gave a bigger tip than that at _lunch_, to a waitress because she smiled at me. this myth that writers will not write unless we pay them is propagated by accountants. i'm a writer and i know lots of other writers. and we write because we _have_to_ write... maybe the _accountants_ will stop working if we don't pay them. (couldn't blame 'em. and you know, that's really not a bad idea.) but us writers will keep right on writing... and we trust that our fans will reward us. not only that, we actively look forward to exercising a gift-based relationship with fans, not the extortion-based one of "pay me first if you want this book". tomorrow's authors will take books _directly_ to their readership. ergo, what they need is a format that will get out of their way when they write, but give the high-powered functionality readers will soon expect from e-books. it's humorous to watch all this flurry around formats and d.r.m. and such. talk about barking up the wrong tree! we're gonna be transforming society! that's what the discussion needs to be! -bowerbird

10-25-2006, 07:35 PM	#43
Bob Russell Recovering Gadget Addict Posts: 5,381 Karma: 676161 Join Date: May 2004 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Device: iPad	Wow! Very intriguing. With respect to the author's viewpoints especially. I wonder how many feel that way, though. I hope many. Transforming society through new ways of making, selling, reading books is an awesome mission.

10-25-2006, 08:05 PM	#45
davidrothman Connoisseur Posts: 60 Karma: 32 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Alexandria, VA Device: Paperwhite, $50 Fire, iPad Air 2, Nexus 6, Kobo Aura H2O	Hi, TadW. I'm making comparisons among existing products. You bet I'm still keen on a common format. Meanwhile folks can check out Jon Noring's take on Adobe DE at http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=5702 . Thanks, David

Advert

Advert