![]() |
#31 | |
Connoisseur
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 77
Karma: 54562
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gangtok (Sikkim), India
Device: Kobo Aura HD
|
Quote:
1. No SD card - my PDFs can be quite bulky and the non-expandable storage might pose a threat later (applies to the Paperwhite too) 2. Old hardware and slow processing power - perhaps Amazon may like to re-Kindle the specification fire on the DX this fall ![]() 3. Screen resolution too low for this generation. I do not require scribbling/annotation facilities right now and the use of stylus seems quite unaccustomed to me. Thanks for your inputs!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 488
Karma: 1080260
Join Date: Sep 2012
Device: sony prs t1 kindle dx ipad
|
Quote:
![]() 2. I don't really care about e-ink hardware spec. as long as I can flip through any pdf reasonably quickly i.e. 1 sec. per page or screen. If it sometimes takes 3-4 seconds to turn another pdf page I would always convert those pdfs to bitmaped pdfs or clearscan (using k2pdfopt or Adobe Acrobat) so that I can again flip through them on Kindle DX at about 1 sec. per page or screen. 3. The same for screen resolution, as long as I can read pdfs and djvus comfortably it is good for me. DX's 150 ppi is the same as Sony DPT-S1's and using fit-to-content-width (i.e. margins cropped) in landscape mode shall even slightly magnify A4 material compared to the paper. I read pdfs on my iPad 1 almost as frequently as on iPad 4, no matter the screen resolution. Last edited by markom; 08-19-2014 at 05:10 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#33 |
Connoisseur
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 77
Karma: 54562
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gangtok (Sikkim), India
Device: Kobo Aura HD
|
I am very very tempted to acquire the Kobo Aura HD immediately, after all the due research. It looks to be the perfect device (for me).
Would it still be wise to wait for Kobo H2O (err...I hate to anticipate the stylus operation on it) or future offerings from Amazon (the lack of PDF support kills me though). Onyx is ruled out (for its below par performance and quality). The only thing left (to make me regret later) is the Inkpad 840. What do you good folks think? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 24,905
Karma: 47303824
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Device: Kobo:Touch,Glo, AuraH2O, GloHD,AuraONE, ClaraHD, Libra H2O; tolinoepos
|
Quote:
As to the possibility of the Kobo Aura H2O using a stylus, I am sure that it will be completely usable with a finger. I think it will still be an ereader rather than an e-ink tablet. And I think it will use the same firmware as the current Kobo e-ink ereaders. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
Connoisseur
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 77
Karma: 54562
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gangtok (Sikkim), India
Device: Kobo Aura HD
|
Quote:
In other words, I can safely go ahead and buy the Aura HD now. Can I? Last edited by xibalban; 08-20-2014 at 07:41 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#36 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 24,905
Karma: 47303824
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Device: Kobo:Touch,Glo, AuraH2O, GloHD,AuraONE, ClaraHD, Libra H2O; tolinoepos
|
Quote:
![]() You can safely buy the Aura HD as it will keep working after the release of a new device. And Kobo won't stop updating the firmware. The only reason to wait is to, possibly, save money or because you think the new device will suit you better. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Junior Member
![]() Posts: 6
Karma: 10
Join Date: Aug 2014
Device: Onyx Boox m96
|
Have you considered Onyx boox m92/m96?
If you have, Why you discard them? Last edited by Fifomime; 08-20-2014 at 10:01 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
Connoisseur
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 77
Karma: 54562
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gangtok (Sikkim), India
Device: Kobo Aura HD
|
Quote:
1. 9.7" Displays with low DPI 2. No Light for night reading 3. Lower Battery life (due to larger screen, I reckon) 4. I didn't want the external navigation buttons (personal choice) 5. Capacitive touchscreen on M92 seemed less responsive than a resistive one (which Aura HD has) 6. Lower hardware specs - 800 MHz & 256 MB RAM 7. Display looked kind of sepia (again due to point # 5 above) 8. M96 is quite expensive Most deductions come from video reviews by GoodeReader.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Junior Member
![]() Posts: 6
Karma: 10
Join Date: Aug 2014
Device: Onyx Boox m96
|
Although I disagree with some of your appreciations, you seem quite sure about what you want already, just need to let the money go XD. So I won't try to change your opinion, knowing that I couldn't even if I tried.
I hope Aura HD suits your demands, I personally find annoying trying to read technical documents on a < 8" screen, but if you are ok with it, I think it is a good device. Good luck. An Aura HD review focusing on this particular use of eink (technical pdf) would be apreciated. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | ||
Connoisseur
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 77
Karma: 54562
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gangtok (Sikkim), India
Device: Kobo Aura HD
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by WT Sharpe; 08-21-2014 at 06:48 AM. Reason: Edited TouTube link to make it viewable. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,454
Karma: 5469320
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: Kobo
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Connoisseur
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 77
Karma: 54562
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gangtok (Sikkim), India
Device: Kobo Aura HD
|
My bad, sorry. The Aura HD does have an IR touchscreen thus eliminating extra layers and hence better screen clarity. Reinforcement of its pros against the Onyx's cons.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Resident Curmudgeon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 79,745
Karma: 145864619
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
But the new Kobo Aura H20 will have a better and faster screen then the HD. The H2O will be using the new 6.8" Carta screen.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,079
Karma: 14079267
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Almere, The Netherlands
Device: Kobo Sage
|
Quote:
Never mind, I found the article at The Digital Reader. You're right, it's Carta. Last edited by mbovenka; 08-21-2014 at 09:13 AM. Reason: Found the Digital Reader article. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Connoisseur
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 77
Karma: 54562
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Gangtok (Sikkim), India
Device: Kobo Aura HD
|
Two adjectives used there: "faster" and "better". "Faster" perhaps due to faster screen refreshes on the Carta but "better", how? Water proof device kind of rules out IR touchscreen, so a capacitive screen wouldn't make it any better, does it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Did you fill your eink reader? | jocampo | General Discussions | 49 | 05-28-2011 09:23 PM |
Advice on my first eInk Reader | KingsGambit | Which one should I buy? | 8 | 06-14-2010 06:28 PM |
Seek VERY simple e-reader | littlereba | Which one should I buy? | 2 | 03-30-2009 09:49 PM |
will 9" eink reader will come first? | power100 | News | 4 | 08-21-2008 01:15 PM |
Build an eink reader. | Charles Gray | News | 32 | 05-13-2008 04:18 PM |