![]() |
#31 |
Fearless Writer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 210
Karma: 375317
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: In a mitten!
Device: Kobo Wifi
|
*laughs* More like a first line of defense against the "deluge of crap," really. You wouldn't attach your work to someone else's book if you wouldn't read it yourself. That kind of thing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
eReader
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,750
Karma: 4968470
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: Note 5; PW3; Nook HD+; ChuWi Hi12; iPad
|
Quote:
Lots of things have changed, lots of things are changing, but for now and at least the immediate future, commercial publication is the best way for an author to build their name and brand identity. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#33 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Sure... if you can get a commercial publisher to give you the time of day. But what we've seen is that most indies won't get touched by a commercial publisher until after they've demonstrated hefty ebook or vanity sales, or developed viral-level buzz. The other 99+% of indies are effectively shut out of that opportunity.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 271
Karma: 610286
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Michigan, USA
Device: Kobo Elipsa, Kindle Paperwhite, Kobo Sage, others
|
There are so many books looking for audience, that almost all of them will always be shut out. There simply isn't enough audience. The question is, how do we decide which ones to shut out? Frankly as a reader, I don't want to do that myself. I only have time to read one or two books per week, and I'd rather skip the lousy ones without having to figure out which ones are lousy by reading them myself.
Publishers perform that weeding-out process rather better than me choosing based on titles or covers or synopsis or authors screaming "pick me pick me!". The author earns their percentage of what I pay for the book, by writing it. The publisher earns their percentage by shielding me from the slushpile. But the publishers are far from perfect, and are they doing their job well enough to justify the portion they get? Maybe not. The problem with the big publishers and the indies both, is that there are always cheat codes, ways to work the system and squeeze things through even if they are terrible. The cheat codes for the big publishers are things like name recognition, personal connections, in-groups, and large amounts of money. The cheat codes for indies are things like authorial self-delusion, sockpuppets, and small amounts of money. The indie's cheat codes are available to anyone, and therefore more authors using them, hence way more volume. As a reader, I want to avoid books that are getting in front of my eyeballs due to someone cheating. There are enough terrible books that cheated their way past the obstacles, now taking up space on the center stage, that there ought to be more room for good ones. But how do we get these cheaters off the stage and the good books onto the stage? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Recipes for "Dilema Veche" and "Observatorul Cultural" - weekly Romanian magazines | song2 | Recipes | 8 | 02-24-2012 07:22 PM |
"CLOUDED RAINBOW" - a twist of Michael Douglas' "Falling Down" | Jonathan Sturak | Self-Promotions by Authors and Publishers | 8 | 08-12-2011 06:42 AM |
"author" and "author sort" fields | Peter2 | Library Management | 0 | 03-09-2011 01:04 PM |
Yep. It's official. Sony Reader has "ruined" books for me. A final "review." | WilliamG | Sony Reader | 48 | 01-14-2011 03:49 AM |
Zinio launches "global newsstand" for digital magazines | Brian | News | 4 | 09-13-2005 09:57 AM |