03-31-2024, 11:09 AM | #16 |
the rook, bossing Never.
Posts: 12,249
Karma: 89531599
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper11
|
No, any PDF reflow is an option, never a default and often useless.
The whole point of PDF is an exact view of what the print will look like, hence a physical page size and typically it may use any mix of raster, vector, text with fonts and postscript programming. A scanned image is not as portable. But you need a big enough screen. It can only be done by epub if it's not really a traditional epub, but the variation of epub3 that actually mimics a PDF. What resolution will the scanned image use?? Last edited by Quoth; 03-31-2024 at 11:11 AM. |
04-01-2024, 09:56 AM | #17 | |
Fanatic
Posts: 550
Karma: 5507106
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Somewhere in Time
Device: Forma, iPad Air 4
|
Quote:
Standard ePub can encapsulate raster image pages. |
|
04-01-2024, 05:24 PM | #18 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 12,594
Karma: 74358024
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto
Device: Libra H2O, Libra Colour
|
You are assuming that the producer who created the PDF version of the RPG book used the exact same source as the printed version.
|
04-01-2024, 06:41 PM | #19 | |
the rook, bossing Never.
Posts: 12,249
Karma: 89531599
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper11
|
Quote:
Before PDF we had multipage TIF which does what you claim. But PDFs are better, because no decision about resolution of the text is needed. The text quality varies with the device resolution. The Raster solution (which can be used with PDFs) has the problem that either the chosen resolution is too poor or not as good as the display. Eink started off at 150 dpi and 167 dpi. Now most mono are 300 dpi, except larger ones. Colour ink is 106 dpi to 150 dpi. LCD screens vary from 72 dpi to 400 dpi in colour. If the screen is too small you have the same issue with a raster image as with a PDF shrunk to fit; the text is unreadible. But if the screen is large enough to read the smallest text, then a PDF that's not a a raster scan (those exist) will always beat a raster scan because the text is stored as text, not images, and the the renderer uses the font in the PDF, which can have hints and also sub-pixel addressing or other font specific antialiasing can be used to suit the display resolution. If the screen is big enough it will display actual original page size. A raster scan can't work like that. If your PDFs don't match the print material then they are pirate or not the same revision or not the same source. Last edited by Quoth; 04-01-2024 at 07:13 PM. |
|
04-01-2024, 07:27 PM | #20 |
Fanatic
Posts: 550
Karma: 5507106
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Somewhere in Time
Device: Forma, iPad Air 4
|
Yes, since that's what most authors do these days. Maintaining two parallel versions is more than twice the work so why bother? I think the real source of the rendering mistakes is excessively complicated PDFs. These books typically have many layers of background images under the text and the text uses weird fonts from who knows where, and Acrobat just can't deal with it without screwing up little things here and there.
|
04-01-2024, 07:32 PM | #21 | |
Fanatic
Posts: 550
Karma: 5507106
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Somewhere in Time
Device: Forma, iPad Air 4
|
Quote:
They might not be the same revisions as the corresponding print versions. I'll check if any of the printed books list source versions. |
|
04-02-2024, 11:29 AM | #22 | |
the rook, bossing Never.
Posts: 12,249
Karma: 89531599
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper11
|
Quote:
Acrobat reader is Adobe. PDFs exported from other random programs (not by Adobe) are simpler than the PDFs Adobe tools can make. Someone messed up. It's not a lack in your Adobe Acrobat reader. |
|
04-02-2024, 01:46 PM | #23 | |
Fanatic
Posts: 550
Karma: 5507106
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Somewhere in Time
Device: Forma, iPad Air 4
|
Quote:
|
|
04-02-2024, 03:39 PM | #24 |
the rook, bossing Never.
Posts: 12,249
Karma: 89531599
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper11
|
Historically scanners and fax servers used Multipage Tiff. Developed by Aldus in 1987. Obviously it was a pure raster format with lossless compression. Adobe bought Aldus. The last change to TIFF was in 1992.
PDF was a development of Postscript and can have text, fonts, postscript programming, bit map images including TIFF, vectors and layers. One idea was so that the scanner or Fax could put a raster layer and an invisible layer of text could be added for search via OCR. Aldus Pagemaker used Postscript on the Mac from 1985 to give true WYSIWG, which MS Word has never done, because it uses the local printer metrics. By 1993 Aldus was owned by Adobe. The first PDF format was 1993! All systems went toward PDF for files to a printer. Quark Express and Ventura ate into Adobe Pagemaker share, so in 1999 Adobe released InDesign. It's primarily for paper so is orientated to production of PDFs. PDF output from Word and LO Writer has got so good that now only big publishers, people doing non-book publishing, specialist text books or more money than sense use InDesign. It was fudged for Azw3 and epub2, because it's for fixed layout paper, so it only does print replica and fixed layout epub3 well. Its roots are postscript in Aldus Pagemaker for the Mac for paper print. Postscript is practically the native content of a PDF, but a pdf is an envelope with multiple layers of anything in it, which is why Nebo or Xodo or Okular or Acrobat can add layers with drawing/handwritten/text layers as annotation. Editing what is already there is very hard to impossible. Why didn't comics / Manga use multpage TIFF? Because those may be a vector or PDF source with maybe bitmaps as well as text. A TIFF is raster based. Compression historically is lossless and per line. Conversion of the comic/manga source to a jpeg or png per page gives adequate quality and when put in a zip gives better compression. Some comics/manga are distributed as mixed bitmap and text which allows TTS of the speech bubbles or zooming them. Scanners, Fax and CRTs are raster (line structured). Modern screens and arbitrary images (from PDF or other) are arrays, bit maps. Amazon is the odd man out on PDFs with the Scribe. Also they should never have marketed Print Replica as "Kindle". Last edited by Quoth; 04-02-2024 at 03:43 PM. |
04-02-2024, 04:23 PM | #25 |
Fanatic
Posts: 550
Karma: 5507106
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Somewhere in Time
Device: Forma, iPad Air 4
|
With a couple of interesting-to-me side branches: Sun Microsystems' NeWS (Network extensible Windowing System) circa 1986 which used an extended version of PostScript directly as a display model. NeXTStep circa 1989 which used Display PostScript. And MacOS X (aka macOS) circa 2001, the direct descendent of NeXTStep, which uses Display PDF.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to make a book in kfx format have the same number of pages as one in azw3? | ksyll | Conversion | 3 | 08-28-2022 06:41 PM |
displaying 2 pages on kindle like a REAL book | vugtitan | Amazon Kindle | 76 | 09-28-2018 07:52 AM |
how can I match calibre pages and paper book pages | khait | Calibre | 1 | 08-23-2017 04:02 PM |
How to make Calibre scroll pages without commas as in real book? | Shakurazz | Recipes | 0 | 06-02-2014 10:01 AM |
Do the number of pages in an ebook differ from the number of pages in a physical book | Phoebemy | General Discussions | 12 | 07-19-2012 09:25 AM |