![]() |
#1 |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 307
Karma: 60998
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Just got my Kindle, and yes, it's better than the Sony Reader.
And I own two Reader PRS-500s (wifey and me).
Got my Kindle this evening. It really is as good as everyone says. Pretty much all my complaints about the Reader are solved: Things I didn't like about the Reader: 1.) Craptastic software. 2.) Tiny page buttons. 3.) Overpriced books 4.) Zero software implementation - i.e. you pretty much literally couldn't do anything but click next page or previous page. 5.) The harshness of the font. Somehow all the fonts were "jaggy" and "harsh" to look at. And only 3 sizes. Easily made more, since I often couldn't find the right-sized font. 6.) No Mac support. I own a Mac. Problem! Having to dual-boot is a pain. 7.) Metal finish on the Reader = COLD, and also my page-turning finger would always sweat on it. Not pleasant. At all. 8.) The annoyance of having to call Sony every time I re-install my OS if I'd forgotten to de-register my computer from the Connect store beforehand. Amazon won this one. Hands down. And you should have seen me gush over the Reader before/when it came out. I gushed thinking of what Sony could do in the next year from October 2006 (PRS-500 release date?). What did Sony do? Well...they broke the battery indicator in the PRS-500 after a few months, and then...uh...months later, they fixed it. Go...Sony? ![]() But the Kindle isn't as sexy as the Reader! All of a sudden I don't care anymore. Amazing... - functionality over form wins out. Anyway, back to reading the NYT! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Lovin' the e-book life...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 633
Karma: 2509
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado
Device: Ebookwise 1150, Sony PRS-505, Amazon Kindle, BeBook (with OpenInkpot)
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Zealot
![]() ![]() Posts: 102
Karma: 101
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Congrats too. I felt (and still feel) exactly the way you do.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 307
Karma: 60998
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
I'm not completely blind, of course. The Kindle is not perfect. I feel like I have to hold the Kindle quite low in my left hand so I can hit the next-page button, and it really is a pretty ugly device.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Gizmologist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
|
Well, numbers 2, 5, and part of 6 went away with the 505, and 3 changed when Amazon beat down the prices for everyone else, but the important thing is that you've found a device that works for you, and I'm very glad for you on that score!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#6 | |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 307
Karma: 60998
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Enthusiast
![]() Posts: 31
Karma: 10
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Device: Kindle 3 wifi, iPhone, iPad
|
Quote:
This was one of the main things that swayed me over to the Kindle. I am currently running Parallels on my Mac, but my older version doesn't support USB (or at least it hasn't worked for me yet), which leaves the store/software unusable for me unless I pay for the Parallels update. At that point, the Kindle isn't really any more expensive (and way more convenient)... David |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Gizmologist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() The Kindle solution is clearly better in that respect for non-windows users. The Cybook Gen3 gets on quite well with non-windows machines to, as I understand it, but for straight ease of getting content (assuming the content they have is the content you want), wireless delivery is a hard act to follow. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 206
Karma: 1723
Join Date: May 2006
Device: Kindle
|
Well I don't think anyone will argue on #2 compared to the kindle's
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Gizmologist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
|
Quote:
![]() I was trying to point out that the 505's buttons are probably ~8 times the size of the 500's, by surface area, that's all. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 307
Karma: 60998
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
I just want to know why the left Previous Page button is so darn big. The Next Page button should be bigger. Silly...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Gadget Geek
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 2,324
Karma: 22221
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: Paperwhite, Kindle 3 (retired), Skindle 1.2 (retired)
|
True. They could shrink that thing up and have more grab space on the side. I don't know why the back button is the most convenient button on the right, either. Those are the two buttons I use least out of the four big ones.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 307
Karma: 60998
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Right. I mean how useful IS a previous page button? I use it so occasionally it's a joke...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Gizmologist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
|
I think part of that depends a good deal on how easy it is to hit the "next page" button by accident.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Al
![]() ![]() Posts: 66
Karma: 140
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bardstown, KY as home base, but RV following the seasons.
Device: Kindle1 and Kindle2 and Palm T|X
|
![]()
I was holding off on the Sony Reader because of all the shortfalls mentioned here, plus Sony's reputation for lousy marketing. When the Kindle came along I ordered one. They sold out so fast that I had to wait for the second batch. It took 12 days to get mine. I have had it about 3 days and have 15 pages of books in the home section. So far I have spent $20 on books, none of them have DRM. The built in dictionary is fantastic. Never before have I had a dictionary along with me to look stuff up. I am also very impressed with the search feature. My only complaint so far is side buttons are so large that they are too easily pushed by accident. I think the next/previous buttons could easily be much smaller with more "grab space". I have recently had eye surgery and this thing is a real savior. One of the primary reasons I bought it was the ability to change the font to a larger size. Of those of you that say this is not a feature, wait until you are 75 years old to comment. I have a friend without a computer who is thinking of buying one for his wife that reads only large print books and who finds those hard to hold. I am a happy reader.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why should I get a Kindle over a Sony Reader? | crutnacker | Amazon Kindle | 103 | 01-03-2010 04:13 PM |
Kindle owners -- Is Kindle less fragile than Sony Reader? | ericastillwell | Amazon Kindle | 40 | 06-18-2009 07:27 PM |
Sony Reader to Kindle 2? | Aybara | Amazon Kindle | 29 | 02-27-2009 07:37 PM |
Kindle vs Sony Reader | pwalker8 | Sony Reader | 40 | 09-18-2008 03:36 PM |
Sony Reader vs. Amazon Kindle - 5:1 for Sony? | TadW | News | 12 | 06-23-2008 02:59 PM |