Books made into movies

SmartyPants · 05-24-2010, 09:09 PM

What is your general opinion of this?
I tend to read a book first.. and if i like it, it is doubtful the movie will live up to my expectations!
Eg Lolita... i hated the movies, all of them. I dont think it is possible to translate Nabokov's writing style into a movie successfully.

I did, however, like Clockwork Orange - book AND movie. Lovely Bones were great as well.

It also annoys me to no end when the movie is made based on some more or less obscure book, and practically no credit is given to book author.

So what are your examples of a good or not so good book to movie transition?

ImogenRose · 05-24-2010, 10:13 PM

I liked the movie version of Clockwork Orange better than the book. I thought both versions of Memoirs of a Geisha were great. Perfume.. liked the book, not so much the movie. Twilight, loved both versions.

AgentBEATS · 05-25-2010, 02:11 AM

I find it rare that a movie adaption of book is ever as good. Of course there are times when it is, but most often than not it just cannot live up to the original material.

I think that applies to any sort of adaption really. Usually a good source material when trying to be adapted into other mediums loses somethings in the transition resulting in mixed results.

Most of the time, I find myself preferring whatever version it is that I experience first. That is unless the other versions are just that much better to overwrite my original opinions. So if I read a book first, chances are I will think that the book is better than the movie. Even particularly good movie versions sometimes lose out to the book just because it is not always possible to fit everything into a movie.

That being said I don't think I've seen many books into movies, or at least with books that I have read.

The Harry Potter movies are hit and miss I find. Enjoyable if you are a fan, but again when they start varying the source material it just doesn't feel right.

I throughly enjoyed the Lord of the Rings movies, however it has been some time since I read the originals so I do not know how much I can stack them up against each other.

I disliked the movie versions of the Twilight series very, very much. Of course I absolutely hated the books so I guess that was a given. Even so the books are far more tolerable(to an extent) than the horrible acting in the movies.

Sparrow · 05-25-2010, 02:25 AM

Having recently read and loved 'Gone with the Wind' when it was an MR Book Club choice, I then watched the film for the first time and thought that was excellent too.

A rotten film of a great book is the 1962 version of 'The Day of the Triffids'.

cearbhallain · 05-25-2010, 12:43 PM

The Man Who Fell to Earth is an example of a movie that while different from the book, is a very good compliment to the book. By which I mean they go together well.

The Ninth Gate is probably better than the book which inspired it - the Club Dumas. I don't know because I got a bit bored with the book and stopped reading with about 1/5 of the book remaining. To be fair(er) the movie only deals with part of the book's plot.

Ea · 05-25-2010, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cearbhallain

The Ninth Gate is probably better than the book which inspired it - the Club Dumas. I don't know because I got a bit bored with the book and stopped reading with about 1/5 of the book remaining. To be fair(er) the movie only deals with part of the book's plot.

Agreed. I do like the book, except for the ending - it's just plain silly and a bit of a letdown. Well, the end of the movie is a little silly as well, but not as much.

Ea · 05-25-2010, 12:59 PM

I think Merchant/Ivory's adaptations of three of E. M. Forster's novels, "Room with a view", "Maurice" and "Howards End" are fully as good as the books. Perhaps it's also because I think Forster's writing lends itself well to adaptation, for example his dialogue works very well with very little change.

One film adaptation that some people probably feel a little "religious" about is "The Lord of the Rings". I personally find that the film is a highly successful adaptation of a book most would think very difficult to adapt. Whether or not it's better, can be discussed.

I think the film "Blade Runner" improves on the original. I don't find the short story "Do androids dream of electric sheep" nearly as interesting and engaging as the film.

.... and now I've just mentioned three of my absolute favourite films (Maurice, Blade Runner, LOTR).

Trini · 05-25-2010, 01:16 PM

I love the Lord of the Rings movie adaptations. That's some of the best ones. I also love Pride and Prejudice 1995 version. The To Kill a MockingBird movie while good was too concise, should have been longer thereby capturing more of the book.

JSWolf · 05-25-2010, 01:18 PM

I did read I am Legend after seeing the movie. Both were good. But the movie was just that much different.

Sparrow · 05-25-2010, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ea

I think the film "Blade Runner" improves on the original. I don't find the short story "Do androids dream of electric sheep" nearly as interesting and engaging as the film.

I agree with that; and in a similar vein, I thought 'A.I.' was a good SF short story adaptation.

cearbhallain · 05-25-2010, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ea

I think the film "Blade Runner" improves on the original. I don't find the short story "Do androids dream of electric sheep" nearly as interesting and engaging as the film.

.... and now I've just mentioned three of my absolute favourite films (Maurice, Blade Runner, LOTR).

DADOES is a novel, and a very complex one. I think it's one of Dick's five best. Bladerunner is a work of art in its own right, and one of my favorite movies, but much like my earlier Tevis example - it's not a very faithful adaptation. It's more like an exploration of one of the book's themes. You'd need a mini-series to get things like Mercerism and mood organs right - You wouldn't happen to know what von Trier's up to these days? I bet he could do it right

Oh, and since we're talking Dick, some of his short stories and novels have inspired some truly enjoyable films:

Total Recall - from We Can Remember it for you Wholesale
A Scanner Darkly - reasonably faithful, excellent use of rotoscope animation that really brought across the feel of the novel.

Then we have such abominations as Minority Report and Paycheck. But even those hackneyed blockbusters have the redeeming feature of putting money in the bank accounts of Dick's kids - which, in my opinion, they totally deserve.

cearbhallain · 05-25-2010, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSWolf

I did read I am Legend after seeing the movie. Both were good. But the movie was just that much different.

I Am Legend has been filmed three times as, Last Man on Earth, The Omega Man, and I Am Legend. Each of these adaptations have their strong points but I found the latest one to be the weakest. The book has also been released as a graphic novel.

While we're on Matheson, Showtime's Masters of Horror anthology series featured one of his darker short stories (first published in the 50's IIRC) directed by Tobe Hooper called Dance of the Dead:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0643102/

brigidbob says "check it out"

HistoryWes · 05-25-2010, 01:59 PM

I like to read the book first and then watch the movie, though the movie seldom lives up to the book. There are a few which do-- The Reader, I thought was really close.

Only twice have I read a book and preferred the movie.
1. The Horse Whisperer: The movie had a better ending. It was begun before the book was even finished.

2. The English Patient: I found that book almost unreadable.

cearbhallain · 05-25-2010, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HistoryWes

2. The English Patient: I found that book almost unreadable.

Tastes really do differ

The English Patient is one of my favorite books and I found the movie to be almost unwatchable. It sure was pretty though.

Penforhire · 05-25-2010, 04:57 PM

Some of Michael Chrichton's books were made into movies with very little of the plot altered (thinking of 13th Warrior, Sphere, Jurassic Park). Yes, the movies lost a TON of infodump that he lays on us, essentially losing the force of his message. But the stories weren't badly warped and the characters only mildly bent.

I hate it when scripts deviate tremendously from the book. I mean, why bother basing it on a book if you're going to rewrite half of it?!

edit - And MC's Congo is an egregious example of the latter. The movie had only a tenuous connection to the book!

05-24-2010, 09:09 PM	#1
SmartyPants Zealot Posts: 119 Karma: 46 Join Date: Jan 2010 Device: Kindle PW	Books made into movies What is your general opinion of this? I tend to read a book first.. and if i like it, it is doubtful the movie will live up to my expectations! Eg Lolita... i hated the movies, all of them. I dont think it is possible to translate Nabokov's writing style into a movie successfully. I did, however, like Clockwork Orange - book AND movie. Lovely Bones were great as well. It also annoys me to no end when the movie is made based on some more or less obscure book, and practically no credit is given to book author. So what are your examples of a good or not so good book to movie transition?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Should e-Books be Rated (like movies and video games)?	Bob Russell	News	109	08-02-2009 04:30 AM
Sony Sale - Books That Became Ocsar Nominated Movies	DixieGal	Deals and Resources (No Self-Promotion or Affiliate Links)	1	02-19-2009 03:28 PM
Books that should be made into a movie...	Colin Dunstan	Lounge	11	05-17-2006 10:20 AM
new movies	pinkduckies109	Lounge	14	02-22-2005 07:40 PM
NYT's 1,000 Best Movies Ever Made	Colin Dunstan	Lounge	2	06-26-2004 02:33 AM

05-24-2010, 10:13 PM	#2
ImogenRose PORTAL Posts: 7,204 Karma: 2884640 Join Date: Apr 2010 Device: Kindle 1, Kindle 3 (3G), iPhone	I liked the movie version of Clockwork Orange better than the book. I thought both versions of Memoirs of a Geisha were great. Perfume.. liked the book, not so much the movie. Twilight, loved both versions.

05-25-2010, 02:11 AM	#3
AgentBEATS Connoisseur Posts: 72 Karma: 10 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Canada Device: Sony PRS-505, Nintendo DS, HTC Desire	I find it rare that a movie adaption of book is ever as good. Of course there are times when it is, but most often than not it just cannot live up to the original material. I think that applies to any sort of adaption really. Usually a good source material when trying to be adapted into other mediums loses somethings in the transition resulting in mixed results. Most of the time, I find myself preferring whatever version it is that I experience first. That is unless the other versions are just that much better to overwrite my original opinions. So if I read a book first, chances are I will think that the book is better than the movie. Even particularly good movie versions sometimes lose out to the book just because it is not always possible to fit everything into a movie. That being said I don't think I've seen many books into movies, or at least with books that I have read. The Harry Potter movies are hit and miss I find. Enjoyable if you are a fan, but again when they start varying the source material it just doesn't feel right. I throughly enjoyed the Lord of the Rings movies, however it has been some time since I read the originals so I do not know how much I can stack them up against each other. I disliked the movie versions of the Twilight series very, very much. Of course I absolutely hated the books so I guess that was a given. Even so the books are far more tolerable(to an extent) than the horrible acting in the movies.

05-25-2010, 02:25 AM	#4
Sparrow Wizard Posts: 4,395 Karma: 1358132 Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: UK Device: Palm TX, CyBook Gen3	Having recently read and loved 'Gone with the Wind' when it was an MR Book Club choice, I then watched the film for the first time and thought that was excellent too. A rotten film of a great book is the 1962 version of 'The Day of the Triffids'.

05-25-2010, 12:43 PM	#5
cearbhallain Groupie Posts: 183 Karma: 1053258 Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Fort Vancouver Device: nook	The Man Who Fell to Earth is an example of a movie that while different from the book, is a very good compliment to the book. By which I mean they go together well. The Ninth Gate is probably better than the book which inspired it - the Club Dumas. I don't know because I got a bit bored with the book and stopped reading with about 1/5 of the book remaining. To be fair(er) the movie only deals with part of the book's plot.

05-25-2010, 12:59 PM	#7
Ea Wizard Posts: 3,490 Karma: 5239563 Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Denmark Device: Kindle 3\|iPad air\|iPhone 4S	I think Merchant/Ivory's adaptations of three of E. M. Forster's novels, "Room with a view", "Maurice" and "Howards End" are fully as good as the books. Perhaps it's also because I think Forster's writing lends itself well to adaptation, for example his dialogue works very well with very little change. One film adaptation that some people probably feel a little "religious" about is "The Lord of the Rings". I personally find that the film is a highly successful adaptation of a book most would think very difficult to adapt. Whether or not it's better, can be discussed. I think the film "Blade Runner" improves on the original. I don't find the short story "Do androids dream of electric sheep" nearly as interesting and engaging as the film. .... and now I've just mentioned three of my absolute favourite films (Maurice, Blade Runner, LOTR).

05-25-2010, 01:16 PM	#8
Trini Connoisseur Posts: 60 Karma: 498442 Join Date: May 2010 Device: sony prs650	I love the Lord of the Rings movie adaptations. That's some of the best ones. I also love Pride and Prejudice 1995 version. The To Kill a MockingBird movie while good was too concise, should have been longer thereby capturing more of the book.

05-25-2010, 01:18 PM	#9
JSWolf Resident Curmudgeon Posts: 80,727 Karma: 150249619 Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3	I did read I am Legend after seeing the movie. Both were good. But the movie was just that much different.

05-25-2010, 01:59 PM	#13
HistoryWes Teacher/Novelist Posts: 632 Karma: 2274466 Join Date: May 2008 Location: Nevada Device: Nook STR, iPad	I like to read the book first and then watch the movie, though the movie seldom lives up to the book. There are a few which do-- The Reader, I thought was really close. Only twice have I read a book and preferred the movie. 1. The Horse Whisperer: The movie had a better ending. It was begun before the book was even finished. 2. The English Patient: I found that book almost unreadable.

05-25-2010, 04:57 PM	#15
Penforhire Wizard Posts: 2,230 Karma: 7145404 Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Southern California Device: Kindle Voyage & iPhone 7+	Some of Michael Chrichton's books were made into movies with very little of the plot altered (thinking of 13th Warrior, Sphere, Jurassic Park). Yes, the movies lost a TON of infodump that he lays on us, essentially losing the force of his message. But the stories weren't badly warped and the characters only mildly bent. I hate it when scripts deviate tremendously from the book. I mean, why bother basing it on a book if you're going to rewrite half of it?! edit - And MC's Congo is an egregious example of the latter. The movie had only a tenuous connection to the book!