|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
![]() Posts: 5
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jul 2026
Location: Kuwait
Device: Kindle Oasis
|
Built a browser extension that scans book reviews for the specific things you want to
Hi all — new here. I read a lot, and built a Chrome extension called BookGlints to solve my own problem. I'd genuinely value this community's take on it, since you all think harder about reading tools than most.
The problem: I kept abandoning books a hundred pages in over things I'd have avoided if I'd known. A flawless "good at everything" protagonist, a forced romance subplot, a series that never gets finished. It's all in the reviews, but nobody reads 200 reviews before starting a book. BookGlints lets you define your own flags in plain language ("protagonist too perfect," "series never finished," anything), then scans a book's Goodreads or StoryGraph reviews and shows you the ones that actually match, quoting the real review text. It matches on meaning rather than keywords, so "Mary Sue" and "main character is good at everything" register as the same concern. The things I suspect this crowd will care about most: It only reads a book's review page when you click Scan. No background tracking, no browsing history, no analytics on what you read. Every result is the actual reviewer's words, not an AI-generated summary — you're never trusting a paraphrase. Works across reviews in multiple languages. Chrome only for now. Free to try, paid tier for heavier use. Link: https://chromewebstore.google.com/de...amdfkgifnlpckd What I'd love from you specifically: does this fit how you decide what to read, and where does the approach fall short? I know this community has strong opinions on reading tools and I'd rather hear the hard feedback now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Resident Curmudgeon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 84,326
Karma: 153744555
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
It should also work on Edge in Windows if you don't run Chrome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
![]() Posts: 5
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jul 2026
Location: Kuwait
Device: Kindle Oasis
|
Good point, thanks! Since it's a Chromium extension it should install fine in Edge straight from the Chrome Web Store (you just have to allow extensions from other stores). I'm on Linux so I can't easily test Edge myself, but if you're on it and give it a try, I'd genuinely love to know if it works cleanly. Might put it on the Edge Add-ons store properly down the line too. Appreciate you flagging it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Weirdo
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,164
Karma: 13121110
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Wuppertal, Germany
Device: Kobo Sage, Kobo Libra 2, reMarkable PaperPro
|
No love for us Firefox users
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
![]() Posts: 5
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jul 2026
Location: Kuwait
Device: Kindle Oasis
|
😄 Firefox is genuinely on my list — the extension code is largely portable thanks to the shared WebExtensions API, so it's more 'when' than 'if,' just needs some Firefox-specific adjustments. Chrome first was really just to get it out the door. Good to know there's Firefox interest here though — that actually bumps it up my priority list. I'll come back and post when it's ready if you'd like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Resident Curmudgeon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 84,326
Karma: 153744555
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
Have you tested this plugin with MS Edge?
I also use Firefox as my main browser. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Junior Member
![]() Posts: 5
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jul 2026
Location: Kuwait
Device: Kindle Oasis
|
On Edge — I haven't formally tested it, but since Edge is Chromium-based, it should install straight from the Chrome Web Store (you may need to allow extensions from other stores). If you try it, I'd love to know it works cleanly for you.
Firefox is the one that needs real work — it uses a different engine, so it's a genuine port rather than a drop-in, though the extension code is largely portable thanks to the shared WebExtensions API. It's on my list, and interest here is bumping it up. I'll post when there's a Firefox version ready if you'd like. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Executing calibre searches from a browser extension | kiwidude | Development | 6 | 01-30-2024 04:30 AM |
| [KUAL Extension] HTTP-based file browser | ngxson | Kindle Developer's Corner | 6 | 01-14-2024 11:59 AM |
| Clara HD anyone know how to disable the built-in web browser? | cbf123 | Kobo Developer's Corner | 10 | 01-03-2019 11:57 AM |
| Chrome Browser and send to Kindle extension | janrey | Amazon Kindle | 14 | 12-08-2011 02:50 PM |
| Send websites / links to Kindle - extension for browser? | scenox | Kindle Developer's Corner | 0 | 12-20-2010 12:23 PM |