Register Guidelines E-Books Today's Posts Search

Go Back   MobileRead Forums > E-Book General > News

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-26-2016, 05:57 PM   #1
kennyc
The Dank Side of the Moon
kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kennyc ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
kennyc's Avatar
 
Posts: 35,897
Karma: 119230421
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Device: Kindle2; Kindle Fire
Google wins over Oracle

This could have affected any Android devices - readers, phones, tablets, etc. It is the correct decision/result IMO.

"Google won a jury verdict that kills Oracle’s claim to a $9 billion slice of the search giant’s Android phone business.

Oracle contended that Google needed a license to use its Java programming language to develop Android, the operating system in 80 percent of the world’s mobile devices. Jurors in San Francisco federal court on Thursday rejected that argument and concluded Google made fair use of the code under copyright law....."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...c91_story.html
kennyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 10:49 PM   #2
bgalbrecht
Wizard
bgalbrecht ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bgalbrecht ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bgalbrecht ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bgalbrecht ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bgalbrecht ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bgalbrecht ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bgalbrecht ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bgalbrecht ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bgalbrecht ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bgalbrecht ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bgalbrecht ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,806
Karma: 13399999
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: US
Device: Nook Simple Touch, Kobo Glo HD, Kobo Clara HD, Kindle 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyc View Post
This could have affected any Android devices - readers, phones, tablets, etc. It is the correct decision/result IMO.

"Google won a jury verdict that kills Oracle’s claim to a $9 billion slice of the search giant’s Android phone business.

Oracle contended that Google needed a license to use its Java programming language to develop Android, the operating system in 80 percent of the world’s mobile devices. Jurors in San Francisco federal court on Thursday rejected that argument and concluded Google made fair use of the code under copyright law....."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...c91_story.html
As a computer programmer, I think the jury made the correct decision. If Oracle had won, it would have overturned a 60+ year tradition of programmers improving upon other people's software by retaining the API but replacing the implementation with a better one.
bgalbrecht is offline   Reply With Quote
Advert
Old 05-26-2016, 11:42 PM   #3
rdfry
loving the books
rdfry ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rdfry ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rdfry ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rdfry ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rdfry ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rdfry ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rdfry ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rdfry ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rdfry ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rdfry ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rdfry ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rdfry's Avatar
 
Posts: 374
Karma: 18825402
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: DFW
Device: Rooted Nook, Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4, Galaxy Note 5, 2 Fire 7s Note 8
It was a travesty from the beginning. Larry Ellison is from the Steve Jobs School of patent trolling.
rdfry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2016, 02:39 AM   #4
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Finally, this pathetic copyright trolling has been beaten down.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2016, 05:05 AM   #5
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 73,941
Karma: 315160596
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
I'll point out that although the decision went the right way, it doesn't seem to have done so for the ideal reason.

"Jurors [...] concluded that Google made fair use of the code under copyright law."

They didn't throw out the case because APIs can't be copyright, but only because they felt that use of the API was fair use.

I would have preferred a result that concluded that the API on its own wasn't copyrightable.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Advert
Old 05-27-2016, 06:59 AM   #6
dickloraine
Guru
dickloraine ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dickloraine ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dickloraine ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dickloraine ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dickloraine ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dickloraine ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dickloraine ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dickloraine ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dickloraine ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dickloraine ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dickloraine ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 631
Karma: 7544528
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berlin
Device: PRS 350, Kobo Aura
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
I'll point out that although the decision went the right way, it doesn't seem to have done so for the ideal reason.

"Jurors [...] concluded that Google made fair use of the code under copyright law."

They didn't throw out the case because APIs can't be copyright, but only because they felt that use of the API was fair use.

I would have preferred a result that concluded that the API on its own wasn't copyrightable.
That was not possible. This was the fourth trial of the case. Oracle won the first one. Google appealed and won the appeal. There the outcome was what you hoped. But then the federal court ruled against it. The supreme court refused to hear the case. So it went back to the second court and the only way left open for google was fair use.
dickloraine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2016, 07:00 AM   #7
murg
No Comment
murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,240
Karma: 23878043
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo: Not just an eReader, it's an adventure!
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
I'll point out that although the decision went the right way, it doesn't seem to have done so for the ideal reason.

"Jurors [...] concluded that Google made fair use of the code under copyright law."

They didn't throw out the case because APIs can't be copyright, but only because they felt that use of the API was fair use.

I would have preferred a result that concluded that the API on its own wasn't copyrightable.
Because of differences in the terms of 'fair use' in various countries, API's being copyrightable but also fair useable may lead to software being legal in some countries and illegal in others.
murg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2016, 08:32 AM   #8
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
The obvious solution is that software is not copyrightable. As a programmer, I know that every piece of software is built on top of someone else's software. That's the way programming works, you use common patterns that have been used by everyone for years. It's pretty obvious that copyright was intended for individual works of art. The idea that software was copyrightable was simply a lawyer's construction in an attempt to create a barrier against other people entering their market.

Frankly, if Oracle is successful in trying to use Java to extort money out of other companies, it will destroy the software industry. Obviously, programmers will start moving to other platforms, but the problem is that no platform is safe.
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2016, 08:56 AM   #9
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 73,941
Karma: 315160596
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
The obvious solution is that software is not copyrightable. As a programmer, I know that every piece of software is built on top of someone else's software. That's the way programming works, you use common patterns that have been used by everyone for years. It's pretty obvious that copyright was intended for individual works of art. The idea that software was copyrightable was simply a lawyer's construction in an attempt to create a barrier against other people entering their market.

Frankly, if Oracle is successful in trying to use Java to extort money out of other companies, it will destroy the software industry. Obviously, programmers will start moving to other platforms, but the problem is that no platform is safe.

There's nothing wrong with software being copyrightable. Although I would prefer it to be in its own category rather than shoe-horned into literary work.

But an API just shouldn't be copyrightable at all.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2016, 10:29 AM   #10
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
There's nothing wrong with software being copyrightable. Although I would prefer it to be in its own category rather than shoe-horned into literary work.

But an API just shouldn't be copyrightable at all.
Your points are both good.

But API's are a mixed bag: in some ways they are an expression of an idea and in other ways they are an idea expressed by the code they call.
If they aren't copyrightable they would likely be patentable and that would be more troublesome than being copyrightable.

Going with fair use might be the best ruling for Google supporters.

Just remember the case is not over.
Appeals remain.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2016, 11:06 AM   #11
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 73,941
Karma: 315160596
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
Going with fair use might be the best ruling for Google supporters.
I don't really care what happens to the two principles in this case. But if use of APIs require a licence because of copyright, far more people will be affected.

All those PostScript clones will stop. Wine will be no more. there's an amazing amount of software built on the free re-implementations of APIs.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2016, 12:58 PM   #12
jhowell
Grand Sorcerer
jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
jhowell's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,070
Karma: 91577715
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Device: Kindles
I can see copyright for the documentation of an API, not the API itself. To me a patent makes much more sense for an API since it is a functional entity. In either case any elements that are staright-forward extensions of previously existing APIs should be excluded from protection.
jhowell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2016, 01:47 PM   #13
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383099
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
In all honesty I can see no reason why an API would not be protected by copyright. Is the design of an API not a creative process? If it is (and it certainly seems to me that it is) then it should automatically be protected by copyright under the Berne Convention.

Does anyone know what the arguments are to the contrary?
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2016, 02:02 PM   #14
Ekaros
Illiterate newbie
Ekaros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ekaros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ekaros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ekaros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ekaros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ekaros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ekaros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ekaros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ekaros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ekaros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ekaros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Ekaros's Avatar
 
Posts: 661
Karma: 1702090
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Finland
Device: Sony PRS-T1
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
In all honesty I can see no reason why an API would not be protected by copyright. Is the design of an API not a creative process? If it is (and it certainly seems to me that it is) then it should automatically be protected by copyright under the Berne Convention.

Does anyone know what the arguments are to the contrary?
It's not a simple thing to make, but essentially it's just naming convention of names and parameters. This convention can be then used to operate on code behind it.
In sense it would be like copyrighting using of certain terminology in certain contexts.

Also in EU APIs aren't copyrightable...
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2...opolise-ideas/
Quote:
"To accept that the functionality of a computer program can be protected by copyright would amount to making it possible to monopolise ideas, to the detriment of technological progress and industrial development," the court stated.
Essentially, even if good API design is very hard, in large scale it would be destructive. As you could copyright print("text"). And then use very basic thing of language as tool to attack competition...
Ekaros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2016, 02:27 PM   #15
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,389
Karma: 68329346
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Would a verdict for Oracle have meant that AT&T could claim infringement for all Linux and other *NIX implementations?

Anyway, knowing nothing about the case besides what I read in this thread, I'm glad Google won.

Oh, and the thread title had me confused. I thought it was saying that Google had convinced Oracle to come over to Google's side, i.e. they won them over.

Last edited by ApK; 05-27-2016 at 02:30 PM.
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Google's Oracle appeal denied fjtorres News 45 07-13-2015 10:43 AM
Google Books wins -- Fair Use says Judge kennyc General Discussions 74 11-21-2013 12:22 PM
Google settles and pays damages over Oracle lawsuit JoeD News 8 06-22-2012 12:43 PM
Jury finds that Google doesn't infringe Oracle patent afv011 News 8 05-31-2012 06:51 PM
Android 'important but not critical' to Google, says Page in Oracle trial monkeyluis Android Devices 8 04-20-2012 02:39 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 PM.


MobileRead.com is a privately owned, operated and funded community.