Register Guidelines E-Books Today's Posts Search

Go Back   MobileRead Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Handhelds and Smartphones

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2006, 04:21 PM   #1
Bob Russell
Recovering Gadget Addict
Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Bob Russell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Bob Russell's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,381
Karma: 676161
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Device: iPad
Quandry for portable device designers

RIM Chairman Jim Balsillie spoke recently at a breakfast that was attended by Palm Addict's Associate Writer Peter Wolchak.

Mr. Balsillie provided a very concise description of the tug of war that goes into every portable device design. "Asked what future BlackBerrys will look like, Balsillie said 'A lot of people tell us they want the device to be smaller.' He then paused and shrugged. 'But they also want a larger screen and a larger keyboard.' "

Similar conversations were occuring at last year's PalmSource Developers Conference in San Jose. I had the opportunity to visit with a product manager for PalmOne, and even among developers and techies he was often facing questions that in some way or other could boil down to the same issue of wanting devices to be bigger and smaller at the same time. Bigger screen and keyboard, but with a smaller case. More memory, brighter screen and small form factor, but a longer battery life. It's forever a tension of tradeoffs.

The good news? As the technology improves, the tradeoff curve gets better. Smaller more efficient radios in smartphones. Smaller more efficient batteries or fuel cells. Chip sets combined to reduce internal space for circuitry. More efficient and effective screens. In fact, I suspect that better designs for integrating keyboards will even show up over time.

So designs will get better as the technology allows. But the tradeoffs will never go away.

You can find Peter's original post at PalmAddicts.
Bob Russell is offline  
Old 02-07-2006, 05:18 PM   #2
Antoine of MMM
Mobile Ministry Magazine
Antoine of MMM is fluent in JavaScript as well as Klingon.Antoine of MMM is fluent in JavaScript as well as Klingon.Antoine of MMM is fluent in JavaScript as well as Klingon.Antoine of MMM is fluent in JavaScript as well as Klingon.Antoine of MMM is fluent in JavaScript as well as Klingon.Antoine of MMM is fluent in JavaScript as well as Klingon.Antoine of MMM is fluent in JavaScript as well as Klingon.Antoine of MMM is fluent in JavaScript as well as Klingon.Antoine of MMM is fluent in JavaScript as well as Klingon.Antoine of MMM is fluent in JavaScript as well as Klingon.Antoine of MMM is fluent in JavaScript as well as Klingon.
 
Antoine of MMM's Avatar
 
Posts: 119
Karma: 4507
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Device: Nokia N75/N800 Internet Tablet
Yea, we really do want everything. But designers are right, there is a ton of give and take and not always does tech make that easy. I personally find there being two type of people to design for, data inputters and viewers. Viewers want battery life and screen size; power and flexiblity with connectivity. Data inputters value UI, functional design (not necessairly smaller), and exposed inputting options having as much space as the screen. Its not too much different than designing a website IMHO. There are folks that want something to view, and others who want something that is interactive. Finding most users in those areas would make it somewhat easier, though I do agree that the dynamics of design leave those two areas way too narrow.
Antoine of MMM is offline  
Advert
Old 02-08-2006, 02:04 PM   #3
rmeister0
Addict
rmeister0 has a complete set of Star Wars action figures.rmeister0 has a complete set of Star Wars action figures.rmeister0 has a complete set of Star Wars action figures.
 
Posts: 270
Karma: 298
Join Date: Mar 2005
Funny how we're going to extremes here.

My television is a 65" 16x9 display. My iPod has a 2.5" display. I have nothing in between.
rmeister0 is offline  
Old 02-09-2006, 02:13 AM   #4
Alexander Turcic
Fully Converged
Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Alexander Turcic ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Alexander Turcic's Avatar
 
Posts: 18,175
Karma: 14021202
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Switzerland
Device: Too many to count here.
65"? WOW! Plasma?
Alexander Turcic is offline  
 


Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Classic Designers covers for Nook... Kris777 Barnes & Noble NOOK 5 03-15-2010 12:53 PM
Minidock adds a nice display to your portable device Bob Russell Alternative Devices 7 02-20-2008 10:05 AM
Risks of losing a portable device (poll) Alexander Turcic Lounge 12 03-12-2007 04:12 PM
A PDA Purchasing Quandry Is Upon Me Bob Russell Lounge 12 05-20-2005 09:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 AM.


MobileRead.com is a privately owned, operated and funded community.