![]() |
#1 | |
Recovering Gadget Addict
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 5,381
Karma: 676161
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Device: iPad
|
PDA and Phone Convergence - Consumers don't really want it
![]() Many PDA enthusiasts have been saying this for quite a while, scoffing at the idea that adding a phone to a PDA is a always a good thing. Citing feature compromises, battery life, size, cost, and a host of other reasons the idea of independent devices is more palatable. But the industry experts have loudly and confidently proclaimed that the smartphone category will almost completely squeeze out the separate PDA and mobile phone categories. Don't count out smartphones though.... pretty soon the compromises may start to disappear as technology improves. And consumers might not really know what they want. There was a time when people didn't think they wanted a microwave either! Forrester's summary (buy the whole article for just $249) says... Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Fully Converged
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 18,175
Karma: 14021202
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Switzerland
Device: Too many to count here.
|
Interesting find. I would say I have nothing against integrated GSM in my Dell Axim X50v. But I couldn't imagine my Dell Axim X50v integrated in a smartphone. It is all about the form factor, and I don't want to give up the big screen of the PDA in favor of convergence.
|
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#3 | |
Technology Mercenary
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 617
Karma: 2561
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East Lyme, CT
Device: Direct Neural Implant
|
Quote:
I am definately in the "Do Not Converge" category. I have lots of valid justifications for keeping my devices separate, in addition to the obvious ones mentioned above. If this is the way "The Market" is going (as defined by the vendors, not the customers), then I'm going to rapidly find another market to support. I'm not alone in this either, so there will be a dent in the profit margins of companies who don't take the customers into account when making these decisions. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
MobileRead Editor
![]() Posts: 447
Karma: 84
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Device: Treo 700p, Zodiac2
|
I personally prefer a "modular concept" for portable devices.
1. The core device in my ideal setup is a small, pocketable flip-phone with BT, 2G or faster data, a small color screen, mini keyboard, a 1MP or greater camera for candid shots, SD slot and Palm OS for PIM (addresses, phone numbers, calendering). Stereo headphone jack and a good music player with songs stored on a large SD card. 2. A Bluetooth GPS and BT headset. 3. Add a larger media-centric (gaming, video, music, ebooks, audio books etc) tablet PDA with gaming controls, a built-in microdrive (or a CF slot for one), BT, WIFI, dual expansion (one CF and one SDIO), again running Palm OS, a 4 inch VGA display, and USB Hosting. Keep your music library, audiobooks, ebooks and all your important data on the Micro HDD. Transfer songs/playlists back and forth between this device and the phone. Use this as a portable HDD when connected to a computer and easily transfer files back and forth. Hook up your digital camera (#5?) using USB hosting to transfer, store and view pictures on the large screen. 4. A BT keyboard and mouse added to #3 for a laptop replacement. #1 and #3 would be able to synchronize their data automatically. Mix and match as the situation dictates. Running out to the store to grab some milk or out for a run and want to listen to some music? Grab #1. Heading out on a 2-5 day business trip? Take everything and still carry less than a laptop. Use #3 during the flight or down-time for gaming and entertainment (TV shows, movies). In a Wifi hotspot at a coffee shop? Grab #2, 3 & 4 to catch up on email and make VOIP calls using Skype, where your incoming calls are automatically forwarded when #1 is off or set to voicemail. Modular and flexible. #1 and #3 have some overlap, but not much. I don't want a phone that's too big to stick in a pocket, and I don't want a gaming device or PDA with a screen that's too small for movies, ebooks, and games. Convergence is good up to a point: Jack of all trades, master of none with too many compromises. This modular concept would require a lot of cross-device and cross-application integration, but it could be possible with the right combination of applications and OS support (disclaimer: I'm not a developer). Maybe Palm OS on Linux will help make my dream come true ![]() Brian Last edited by ballistic; 01-05-2005 at 09:31 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Technology Mercenary
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 617
Karma: 2561
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East Lyme, CT
Device: Direct Neural Implant
|
Quote:
I'm of the mind set that some convergence in functionality is fine, but merging two overlapping devices into one doesn't make sense, when you remove critical functionality from both. |
|
![]() |
Advert | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A question on convergence... | jeffcobb | Android Developer's Corner | 4 | 10-01-2010 09:09 PM |
Compare Mobile phone, PDA, Smartphone and BlackBerry deals online | alexmurphy | Alternative Devices | 0 | 08-29-2009 01:00 PM |
Consumers Not Convinced they Need Ereader | Moejoe | News | 66 | 08-20-2009 05:21 PM |
Editorial: Getting convergence right | Brian | Lounge | 2 | 11-10-2005 05:39 AM |