Moon+ Reader layout issue

[jonesnc]

I'm having trouble getting Moon+ Reader 3.0.6 to properly display the following code. I am using Sigil 0.8.6.

<p class="txquotecit">recorded July 12, 1843, at Nauvoo, Illinois<a href="../Text/notes.xhtml#notes-ch1-1">1</a></p>

CSS:

.txquotecit {
    display: block;
    font-size: 0.8em;
    margin-bottom: 0;
    margin-left: 10pt;
    margin-right: 10pt;
    margin-top: 0;
    padding-bottom: 0%;
    padding-left: 0%;
    padding-right: 0%;
    padding-top: 0%;
	text-indent: 0em;
	font-size:0.7em; 
	text-align: right;
	font-weight: normal;
}

Moon+ Reader's rendering:
[Image violates Guidelines for size - MODERATOR]

I'd like Moon+ to match Sigil's rendering:


I have CSS enabled.

[Toxaris]

Wrong forum, as this is not a Sigil issue, but an issue of the Moon+ reader. Readers, especially on Android, are a hit-and-miss. Some features work, others don't. What works on one, does not work on another. Especially honor stylesheets is usually badly implemented.

[DiapDealer]

Definitely looks like a Moon glitch. You do have two different font-sizes in your css, but I can't imagine that causing the link text to render ahead of the paragraph text. I frankly can't imagine any css that would make that happen. But then again, Moon+ is notorious for doing what it (or the user) wants ... with little regard for what the ebook creator intended. Sometimes it just does things wrong.

[theducks]

Moving to EPUB. Not a Sigil caused problem.

[AlexBell]

I agree with DiapDealer; I think that the query belongs in the android tablet forum.

For what it is worth I think Mantano was the most likely to work with CSS. If my memory serves me rightly Moon+ was one of the least likely to work.

[Dr. Drib]

Moderator Notice

Please take a few moments to read our Posting Guidelines, in particular the part about the maximum image size allowed (600x600 pixels). Images that violate those guidelines will be deleted.

Thanks.

[AlexBell]

Originally Posted by Dr. Drib

Please take a few moments to read our Posting Guidelines, in particular the part about the maximum image size allowed (600x600 pixels). Images that violate those guidelines will be deleted.

Thanks.

Is this addressed to me? I've used this avatar for seven years, and not had any previous complaints. So far as I can tell with a quick check it's 115px * 120px.

[Tex2002ans]

Originally Posted by AlexBell

Is this addressed to me? I've used this avatar for seven years, and not had any previous complaints. So far as I can tell with a quick check it's 115px * 120px.

No, it was addressed to the original poster (jonesnc). They embedded an image that was very wide, and broke the look of the forum.

I always prefer attaching the image, instead of using the dreaded "Insert Image" button when making posts.

[AlexBell]

Originally Posted by Tex2002ans

No, it was addressed to the original poster (jonesnc). They embedded an image that was very wide, and broke the look of the forum.

I always prefer attaching the image, instead of using the dreaded "Insert Image" button when making posts.

Thanks. I apologise for my misunderstanding, which has caused extra work for Dr Drib since I sent him a message this morning. I hope that he will see this first.