View Single Post
Old 06-22-2017, 09:16 AM   #9
knc1
Going Viral
knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
knc1's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,212
Karma: 18210809
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Central Texas
Device: No K1, PW2, KV, KOA
Quote:
Originally Posted by stumped View Post
- - - - -
more and more financial sites are now insisting on sms based security features
That is only "warm and fuzzy security" features.
Since sms is not encrypted for transmission.
It could be. *

In fact, voice is often not encrypted, although it can be.
That just depends on how cheap your cell phone and your service provider is.

- - - -

* Which gives the financial institution "plausible deniability" if you suffer a loss based on something they send via sms.
I.E:
Not their fault, it is the fault of (pick one or more):
Your service provider (not encrypting sms when they could have),
Your cell 'phone (not supporting encrypted sms because it is too cheap a model)
Your fault (you picked the cell 'phone and the service provider)

And who in the world ever thought a cell 'phone was a secure repository of sensitive information?
It isn't, it can't be, unless physically secured by the owner (which makes it sort of hard to use - unless you can get into the safe in time to answer the call).

The basic of basics:
"No computer system of security can exist when the computer system is itself physical insecure."

Last edited by knc1; 06-22-2017 at 09:24 AM.
knc1 is offline   Reply With Quote