View Single Post
Old 08-29-2012, 01:08 AM   #42
geekmaster
Carpe diem, c'est la vie.
geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.geekmaster ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
geekmaster's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,433
Karma: 10773668
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Multiverse 6627A
Device: K1 to PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by shidunce View Post
... Take a look on this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7E36zGHxRw
Its interesting.

Tumors is something that happens because of real abuse of cellphones.
But we should look on wider picture that shows that many many people are suffering (a little), and even don't know about it. ...
That claim is unsubstantiated.

Regarding that youtube video link, blood roulleaux (protein linkage) is claimed from the personal experience of the video narrator to be caused by computer and cellphone exposure, but according to medical literature (http://biomedx.com/microscopes/training/LB1.html), it is caused by "Excess dietary protein, poor assimilation. Eating too much animal protein. Blood too toxic (altered blood pH) from stress, coffee, cigarettes, meat, etc. Dehydration, not drinking enough water (which by the way, is one of the top undiagnosed causes of many ailments)."

Unless those medically recognized causative factors are eliminated by proper scientifically-proven double-blind experiments, the narrator's methodology is not scientifically valid. Did the narrator smoke before this experiment? What did she eat? How long since she had fluid intake, and how much? Also, how were the microscope slides cleaned and sterilized? Could their handling have affected the observed results? These are important questions that must be answered before we can validate her claims or draw any useful conclusions from her limited observations.

She needs to repeat the experiment under the same conditions, with and without the low-level non-ionizing radiation exposure, and again varying her diet, to make any conclusions from self-administered personal blood tests. A larger statistical sample taken at different times of day, over a longer time period of many days, could actually be useful, rather than assuming that computers and cellphones (which are NOT medically recognized as roulleaux causes) have anything at all to do with her blood condition (other than that it is a general sign of disease) at that particular time.

Something that I found particularly interesting at the above biomedx.com link was this: "Also keep in mind that the wrong diet for one's blood type (A, O, B, AB) can agglutinate the blood. Certain food lectins are incompatible with certain blood types." Now that is something that I want to personally research when I get some more time.

Diet and exercise are a lot more important for health than wifi exposure (especially for adults). Even most medically recognized ELF exposure health problems (such as leukemia) are of concern only to growing children. Even electric blankets are not recommended for use by growing children for that very reason. But poor diet can cause a lot more long-term problems for both children and adults. And we certainly need a LOT more exercise (especially in the USA). Video games and text messaging only exercise our thumbs. And we need a LOT less CORN byproducts in our diets.

But we need MORE wireless connectivity (and faster too), not less (IMHO). And more bacon!

Last edited by geekmaster; 08-29-2012 at 01:52 AM.
geekmaster is offline   Reply With Quote