View Single Post
Old 01-16-2013, 08:11 AM   #45
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul View Post
But it is an analyst reporting information from unnamed sources with no verification.

Actually, you don't know that the information hasn't been verified. It may very well have been. The person talking to the sources may have used multiple sources to confirm the same bit of info. And the point is, the analyst isn't making projections or estimates himself.

But let me ask you this, murray: Why wouldn't Apple come out and refute the information if it were false and save its stockholders from potentially vast losses? Why not?

--Pat
PatNY is offline