View Single Post
Old 01-16-2013, 06:36 AM   #36
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul View Post
You are basing an awful lot of precise calculations on a report that has 3 million margin of error (27%) in their guess for what the new orders are.
How reliable do you think they are?
They obviously have incomplete information, which is why they are saying the low end of the estimate of the decrease is about 5 million screens (or 26%) and the high end is about 8 million (or 42%).

I am pretty confident -- as confident as anyone can be using media reports -- that the information is reliable. The media outlets reporting this are fairly reputable. So no matter what end of the spectrum you want to look at (26% or 42%) the decrease due to lowered demand seems fairly significant.

This all assumes defect rates of no more than about 2-3%; I think that assumption would be more than fair. And, of course, the numbers could change at any time -- either upward or downward -- based on any new report that comes out.

--Pat
PatNY is offline