View Single Post
Old 08-13-2012, 01:21 AM   #55
forcheville
Zealot
forcheville ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.forcheville ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.forcheville ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.forcheville ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.forcheville ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.forcheville ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.forcheville ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.forcheville ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.forcheville ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.forcheville ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.forcheville ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 104
Karma: 672100
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Device: Sony prs650, Boox M92, Samsung Slate 7
Exclude the philosophy books because much of philosophy is hard because highly technical, and exclude books that are called hard just because they are long, like "The FQ" (an unbelivably juicy book) and "Clarissa". Also exclude books that are hard because they play around with language in an allusive way, like "Finnegan's Wake" and most things by Gertrude Stein. That leaves books that are hard because what they are trying to convey in the best way they can is something elusive and subtle - "Nightwood" and "To The Lighthouse" fall into this - although I think "TTL" is pretty straightforward.
I would add some of the fictions of Maurice Blanchot, often very short but so difficult to construe that reading them is like trying to pick up a litter of greased piglets.
"Thomas The Obsucure" is pretty obscure, and "Awaiting Oblivion" shortens the wait considerably.
forcheville is offline   Reply With Quote