View Single Post
Old 07-27-2012, 08:39 AM   #39
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,318
Karma: 67930154
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
I don't consider it to be a prejudice. If you buy it for the sex, it's porn.
I don't think that's fair or accurate.
You're defining porn even more subjectively than Justice Potter did.
You aren't just saying "I know it when I see it" but "If anyone thinks it, then it is."

Pornography is not merely anything that appeals to prurient interests.

If a kid looks at Nat Geo just for the naked natives, does that make it porn? If the native was a kid, is NatGeo guilty of child pornography?

Is every attractive woman who passes by a heterosexual male on the street a porn performer?
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote