Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotbob
Of course, I am not sure I want 20k book records cached in memory. I prefer a smaller memory footprint.
BOb
|
You can have either speed or decreased memory consumption, not both. I vote for speed since the size of a typical cached record is about 300 bytes on average (it of course depends on average title/author/publisher/tags lengths) which gives about 5MB of RAM for 20000 records.