Quote:
Originally Posted by scrapking
http://www.inquisitr.com/202733/amaz...et-in-q1-2012/
OK... while clearly the Kindle Fire (and the Kobo Vox, and the Nook tablets) can do more than your average e-reader, aren't they all still considered e-readers? To me an e-reader is any device where e-reading is the main purpose, and the primary way it's marketed. Presumably if people are buying the Fire instead of traditional e-readers, they are doing so because they want it for e-reading!
To me what this article is trying to say is that the Kindle Fire has affected e-ink e-reader sales, which is likely true. I know my girlfriend and I both got Kobo Vox e-readers over traditional e-ink e-readers, and while we can do all sorts of other things with them (and occasionally do), 90%+ of our time on them is spent reading.
So I don't see how the Fire has hurt the e-reading industry.
|
I think they mean dedicated eReaders, the Vox and Fire can do a lot more things than a dedicated eReader, but they do sacrifice battery life and glare on the screen. The Ipad can read books but that doesn't make it an eReader.
Someone could buy a Vox or Fire and never use it for reading and still enjoy it, not so much for a dedicated eReader.