View Single Post
Old 06-11-2011, 05:57 PM   #46
chaley
Grand Sorcerer
chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,742
Karma: 6997045
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Notts, England
Device: Kobo Libra 2
What matters is when control is returned to Qt for event processing. The sequence
done()
start_next_job()
and
start_next_job()
done()
are equivalent because done won't actually be called until the GUI thread event handlers return to Qt. There may be some difference in the order of events in the queue, but I am not convinced that Qt preserves strict queue order.
chaley is offline   Reply With Quote