View Single Post
Old 03-03-2013, 10:42 AM   #71
ottdmk
Wizard
ottdmk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottdmk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottdmk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottdmk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottdmk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottdmk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottdmk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottdmk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottdmk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottdmk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ottdmk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,196
Karma: 3765734
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Lenovo Tab M10 FHD Plus, Lenovo Tab M8 HD
Quote:
Anyhow ... pdf reflow unquestionably would be perceived as a big improvement in usability by the majority of users.
Please don't fall into the fallacy of believing that the opinions represented on this or any other forum represent "the majority of users." Doesn't happen except by accident. Without proper market research no-one can ever tell what "the majority" wants.

You can argue the same way about my feelings that the functionality would only benefit a small minority of Kobo's market. All I have to base *that* on is the fact that very few mass-market retailers offer pdf-only product. Marginally better then using the consensus of a forum, but not by a heck of a lot.

In any case, Kobo uses a third party application, licensed from Adobe, to display epubs. They use their own rendering engine for their "value-added" kepubs. It would not surprise me that the fact that they can render PDFs at all is a side-effect of using Adobe software and hence will never get any development time from Kobo.

Last edited by ottdmk; 03-03-2013 at 10:45 AM.
ottdmk is offline   Reply With Quote