View Single Post
Old 06-29-2012, 02:45 PM   #4
HistoryWes
Teacher/Novelist
HistoryWes ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HistoryWes ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HistoryWes ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HistoryWes ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HistoryWes ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HistoryWes ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HistoryWes ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HistoryWes ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HistoryWes ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HistoryWes ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HistoryWes ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HistoryWes's Avatar
 
Posts: 632
Karma: 2274466
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nevada
Device: Nook STR, iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy View Post
Not to mention the design patent in question is ridiculously generic and should never have been granted in the first place.
I think that's really the problem. These companies seem to be able to patent just about any idea despite how obvous it is, whether it's been done before, or whether another company already has a patent that should cover the that idea. It seems like patent reform would pay off in the resulting unclogging in the judicial system, at least.
HistoryWes is offline   Reply With Quote