Quote:
Originally Posted by Sil_liS
But the reasons why it was falling before didn't go away. It didn't fall faster than before.
|
But you will never know how much the negative news may be further eroding a price until you refute that news.
11 to 14 million
Quote:
Actually the word "cheap" belonged to Apple's Senior Vice President of Marketing, which was quoted in the article that you quoted:
|
But he's referring to the competition (a not too subtle dig there), NOT to any current or future Apple product. Which is my point.
Quote:
Now I understand that you don't consider that the hypothetical Mini can be called "cheap", but in that case Apple didn't deny the rumor of a Mini, it just denied that it will make a cheap smartphone.
|
Apple denied the rumors that were out in the media about the "Mini." Not my own personal conception of what a "Mini" would or should be.
For some reason, analysts and writers were going hog wild describing a hypothetical Mini -- and they were using words like "budget" and "cheap" and imagining all sorts of cuts in quality and features. The Apple exec squashed
that vision of the "Mini."
Personally, I think it's silly to use the term Mini to describe a phone in the context of the current iPhone line. If it means a screen smaller than 3.5" I think it will fail. If it means going back to a 3.5" but with simply pared down specs, then "Mini" is the wrong word to use since 3.5" is what most current iPhones have. Yes, there is an S III Mini, but that "mini" is in relation to one specific distinct model. And even then, I wonder if Samsung couldn't have come up with a better name.
--Pat