Quote:
Originally Posted by j.p.s
It was Apple that ran crying to the UK court system looking for redress of Samsung's imagined infringement of Apple's Imaginary Property.
They also ran crying to Mexican courts claiming that iFone's 2003 trademark is confusing with Apple's 2007 iPhone trademark.
If Apple want compensation for confusion caused by others, why should they expect to cause confusion with impunity?
|
I would have called that Mexican (iFone 2003) confusion caused by Apple.
I sometimes have trouble believing all the stuff they do. It goes beyond silly and foolish.