View Single Post
Old 08-08-2012, 06:00 PM   #55
Graham
Wizard
Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,743
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul View Post
The interesting thing would be to see how many of those 126 items were changed in the next release, and how many of the changes were to match what the iPhone did.

Whatever the merits of the document in addressing the actual technical points of Apple's claims, this is a jury trial rather than a judge only one, and jury trials about winning the jury over. This document has to hurt Samsung in the jury's eyes. Apple can just point to each item in turn and say "Look, they saw what we did, and copied it".
And the document that Samsung could have pointed to to say "just like Apple were making their designs like Sony's" won't be put in front of the jury's eyes. Even if weighed together the Apple document is more damning, it is wrong that counter evidence that is clearly very relevant cannot be presented.

Graham
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote