View Single Post
Old 08-08-2012, 04:06 PM   #54
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,725
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by afv011 View Post
All companies benchmark their devices against the competition. When I worked for a mobile phone company, we had phones from pretty much every other competitor to see how we fared against them, and used that as a way to improve our devices. Nothing to see here, move along.
The interesting thing would be to see how many of those 126 items were changed in the next release, and how many of the changes were to match what the iPhone did.

Whatever the merits of the document in addressing the actual technical points of Apple's claims, this is a jury trial rather than a judge only one, and jury trials about winning the jury over. This document has to hurt Samsung in the jury's eyes. Apple can just point to each item in turn and say "Look, they saw what we did, and copied it".

Last edited by murraypaul; 08-08-2012 at 04:09 PM.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote