View Single Post
Old 09-03-2012, 08:01 PM   #1
twobob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°){ʇlnɐɟ ƃǝs}Týr
twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twobob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
twobob's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,586
Karma: 6299991
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: uti gratia usura (Yao ying da ying; Mo ying da yieng)
Device: PW-WIFI|K5-3G+WIFI| K4|K3-3G|DXG|K2| Rooted Nook Touch
Qt for Embedded Linux, minimum requirements not met, there is always a way

Qt for Embedded Linux Requirements
...
Requirements

The memory and storage requirements for Qt for Embedded Linux depend on a an variety of different factors, including the target architecture and the features enabled in the Qt build.

The following table shows typical library sizes for the most common Qt libraries on different architectures, built in release mode with different feature profiles.

Architecture Compiler

linux-x86-g++ GCC 4.2.4
linux-arm-g++ GCC 4.1.1


our min max buildchains are CS TC 2006q3 - 2007q3
(as 2008q1 is a brown-bag and 2008q3 exceed our price range into from 2_4 into 2_7

so do we hit those targets??? Sadly no.

me@dev /opt/arm-2007q3/bin $ ./arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc --version
Quote:
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc (CodeSourcery Sourcery G++ Lite 2007q3-51) 4.2.1
Would happily take input on the "arm version" numbering though...
does that imply one could build qt on the machine... raspbian style?
it would take 14 days, a memory graft and ten million amps, but does it?

Simply consigning this to the vault of "can't do" annoys me when it so patently can be done in some fashion. Others have put together QT offerings, is it simply that the more recent versions of QT rely on a TC too recent? input gratefully accepted. would like to put qt back on the books in the medium term, hence this post.

Thanks : )

Last edited by twobob; 09-03-2012 at 08:07 PM.
twobob is offline   Reply With Quote