I've only read the first three pages, but I agree with CarlD.
Starting on page one and upping the stakes on page two, you (KevinR) are very fast to toss the word "discrimination" around, upping it to calling someone's argument "right wing" and whatnot. It's as if you don't understand that if businesses had to follow your argumentation, they would have to give - and deliver by whatever means - their products to anyone who wanted them and they should be able to pay by any means of their choice - be it debitcard, creditcard, cheque, cash, or even rabbits, oats, or goats.
I don't get it why you start a thread about the other closed thread, and begin by crying "discrimination!" from the get-go. There's a reason that other thread was closed, methinks.
|