Fair enough. I guess only time will tell whether the average user understands what ORIGINAL_xxx is for. Early indications appear to show that some think it's some kind of backup and learn the facts the hard way. Let's hope it's just teething problems.
Odd really. The feature to not destroy the original in a same-format-conversion is something that's been mentioned quite a lot in the past. Now we've got it some people are complaining. No good deed goes unpunished
