View Single Post
Old 01-16-2013, 09:00 AM   #53
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul View Post
What does that have to do with it?
They should only correct misinformation that lowers the share price, but not misinformation that raises it?

They should correct any significant rumor that is an assertion of fact and that is incorrect. Especially when it can impact share prices so starkly.

The statements regarding decreased orders for screen displays were assertions of fact. The "rumors" of an iPhone Mini were not assertions of fact, but rather clearly predictions.

--Pat
PatNY is offline