Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres
The most likely reason is "what the market will bear" pricing.
When you can charge an extra $100 for $5 worth of silicon and *still* be under-pricing the market leader you just smile and pocket the extra $80 the buyers give you.
Frederick Douglass comes to mind, despite the very different context:
|
Just so we're clear, you're blaming Apple for Google's pricing strategy?