View Single Post
Old 10-08-2017, 01:15 PM   #4
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,809
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
I think it is unlikely. As latepaul says, there is the fact that copyright does not cover ideas, only their expression. Copyright only comes into effect when that expression takes form, and a table of contents is, almost by definition, an incomplete expression of the idea.

But a lot of this stuff will vary with time and place. This article from Wikipedia Threshold of originality (which relates to what Cinisajoy was saying) demonstrates some of the vagaries of copyright, showing that in borderline cases the only way to find out would be to take it to court.

Which leaves the final point. Copyright is only much good to you if you have the resources to contest it when violated. In cases where the violation is blatant and the violator has made money the chances are you'd find someone to help you take it on. But in borderline cases, where the outcome is uncertain, you'd probably be on your own and it could get very expensive.
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote