MobileRead Forums - View Single Post - MobileRead Discussion of Definition of Category Nominations for July 2013

JSWolf · 01-18-2013, 07:10 PM

Seems we have an issue with two of the June 2013 categories. They were not defined and thus, they left themselves open for books not actually intended for them (but they do fit the category). All categories should be defined (except Classics as that's not possible to do) if there's even the slightest doubt as to what's allowable and what's not. That way we won't have any arguments/discussions on what's allowed and what's not because someone forgot to define it when it was being nominated.

01-18-2013, 07:10 PM	#1
JSWolf Resident Curmudgeon Posts: 73,987 Karma: 128903378 Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3	Discussion of Definition of Category Nominations for July 2013 Seems we have an issue with two of the June 2013 categories. They were not defined and thus, they left themselves open for books not actually intended for them (but they do fit the category). All categories should be defined (except Classics as that's not possible to do) if there's even the slightest doubt as to what's allowable and what's not. That way we won't have any arguments/discussions on what's allowed and what's not because someone forgot to define it when it was being nominated.