Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch
Well, all of that is true--but I still say that trying to go from about 2.5mb per image, to 175kb each, is not going to go well, "without losing image resolution."
As I said, we just tried to do something similar and eventually, the client gave up. I'd warned him that it wouldn't, and as it happened, yes, I ended up wasting my time on demos/samples, but at least I didn't end up with an unhappy client thinking I'd sandbagged him or the like.
Hitch
|
Oh - no argument from me on that part! I was just correcting Jon's statement that everything had to be JPG format.